Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So... Why are they called "BlueDog Democrats"?????

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Yes We Did Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 03:17 PM
Original message
So... Why are they called "BlueDog Democrats"?????
I mean... it seems rather contradictory, doesn't it? Shouldn't the term be RedDog Democrats? They're not liberal... They're really closet republicans... Just saying...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. They are all funded by Blue Cross/Blue Shield.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jn2375 Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. they should be called BlueCross Democrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. That would seem, pretty logical
Edited on Wed Jul-22-09 03:20 PM by Proud Liberal Dem
Also, why "DOGS"??? Why not "HELL HOUNDS"????!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. "choked blue"
The Blue Dog Coalition: 15 Years of Leadership



The Blue Dog Coalition - who celebrated 15 years of leadership in 2009 - has built a reputation as a serious player in the policy arena, promoting positions which bridge the gap between ideological extremes. Many of the group's policy proposals have been praised as fair, responsible, and positive additions to a Congressional environment too often marked as partisan and antagonistic.

The 51 conservative and moderate Democrats in the group hail from every region of the country, although the group acknowledges some southern ancestry which accounts for the group's nickname. Taken from the South's longtime description of a party loyalist as one who would vote for a yellow dog if it were on the ballot as a Democrat, the "Blue Dog" moniker was taken by members of The Coalition because their moderate-to-conservative-views had been "choked blue" by their party in the years leading up to the 1994 election.

The Coalition was formed in the 104th Congress as a policy-oriented group to give moderate and conservative Democrats in the House of Representatives a common sense, bridge-building voice within the institution.

Most agree that, since then, the Blue Dogs have successfully injected a moderate viewpoint into the Democratic Caucus, where group members now find greater receptiveness to their opinions. In fact, the continuing political success of "Blue Pups" in the 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004 and 2006 elections points to the public's approval of the centrist, fiscally responsible message represented by The Coalition. Since 1996, 24 Blue Dogs won their seats by defeating a Republican incumbent.

The Coalition has been particularly active on fiscal issues, relentlessly pursuing a balanced budget and then protecting that achievement from politically popular "raids" on the budget. Past Coalition budgets have won the endorsement of the nonpartisan Concord Coalition and multiple newspaper and magazine editorials. As one column pointed out, the Blue Dogs have proven that "common sense, conservative economics and compassion aren't necessarily mutually exclusive."

Blue Dog Coalition proposals have served as middle-ground markers which laid the foundation for the bipartisanship necessary to bring about fundamental reforms, and helped set into law policies reflecting the "common sense, conservative compassion" so often attached to the group's efforts.

In the 111th Congress, the Coalition intends to continue to make a difference in Congress by forging middle-ground, bipartisan answers to the current challenges facing the Country. A top priority will be to refocus Congress on balancing the budget and ridding taxpayers of the burden the debt places on them. The group also expects to be involved in a variety of issues, where the stale extreme left vs. right approach requires a breath of fresh air.


http://www.house.gov/melancon/BlueDogs/10%20Years%20of%20Leadership.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Cuz' they hold their breath and stomp their little feet till they get their way.
(turning BLUE in the process.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Because they vote democrat more often than republican
and they are the only reason we ever win national elections - if everyone who voted for moderate dems voted for the GOP it would be president McCain and VP Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberblonde Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I didn't know that!
I thought it was because they had a chokehold on the Democratic Party's balls!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. No let us turn that to reality
They are the main reason the Democratic Party loses elections because they ensure that the party does not deliver in its commitments. in fact far from delivering on commitments it stomps on the head of the people that vote for it.

Where would gore have been if the democratic party had rejected the bullshit about blaming the poor for being poor - which led to a Democratic President (not Reagan, not Bush) cutting unemployment benefits to six months?

Where would health care proposals be now if the party did not have to worry about elected Democratic Senators voting with Republicans?

Where would unemployment be now if the stimulus bill contained more stimulus and less Rethug tax cuts?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's Leftwing Republicans and Rightwing Democrats
Edited on Wed Jul-22-09 04:26 PM by Hutzpa


:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Founded under Clinton to copy his electoral strategy when blue = loyalist and red = opposition.
Edited on Wed Jul-22-09 04:37 PM by ieoeja

Blue = Democrat and Red = Republican got cemented following the 2000 election when Blue was supposed to have meant the incumbent party.


Part of Clinton's campaign strategy was to run as a Southern Democrat and against the National, Liberal Democratic party. Rightist pundits did much chortling during that campaign about Clinton campaigning against Congress when the Congress was in Democratic hands.

Those who accuse the Democrats in Congress of stabbing Clinton in the back obviously weren't paying any attention to what he did to them first. And a lot of us blame/credit this strategy as a major factor in the 1994 loss of Congress.

Some on this very thread credit Blue Dogs as the only reason we win nationally. I would point out the FACTS that before Blue Dogs we had both houses of Congress, a majority of governorships and a majority of state legislatures. We did not begin losing nationally until after the founding of the Blue Dogs.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's a misspelling of "blew"...in reference to how they so enthusiastically fellate...
their corporate masters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. The blue dog was an image created by a painter from Louisiana.
Two congressmen from that state hosted several regular meetings of Democrats who supported Reagan tax cuts and other conservative initiatives. Both offices had pictures with the blue dog created by George Rodrique. The blue dog then became this group's chosen symbol as counterpoint to the age old Southern Democratic symbol of a yellow dog. It says quite a bit about the original group and possibly this bloc that one of the leaders of the Blue Dogs was Billy Tauzin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Because they will hold their breath until their faces turn blue if they don't get what they want?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. The dog part is right on the money
Roof!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jn2375 Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. They're really BlueCross democrats with small d
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC