Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now Harry Reid won't say whether he supports a public option!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 10:53 PM
Original message
Now Harry Reid won't say whether he supports a public option!
Harry Reid promises committee bill by recess
By ALEX ISENSTADT
July 28, 2009

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid vowed today that the Senate Finance Committee would wrap up its work on the health care reform bill before the end of next week.

The Finance Committee has yet to finish its work on the bill, which will have to be merged with a bill that has already been passed in the Senate HELP Committee. The Finance Committee remains hung up on how to pay for the package, but the panel negotiators have been moving toward dropping the public option for insurance.

Reid today was vague on whether he supported the public option, the most controversial and expensive aspect of President Barack Obama’s health care push. Opponents of the public option have suggested that a compromise take place that would remove the public plan from the package.

“What I think should be in the bill is something that I will vote for according to my conscience when we get this bill to the floor,” Reid told reporters today. “But I have a responsibility to get a bill to the Senate floor that will get 60 votes that we can proceed toward.”

“That’s my No. 1 responsibility,” Reid continued, “and there are times I have to set aside my personal preferences for the good of the Senate and I think the country.”


Harry Reid won't say whether he supports a public option.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25519.html#ixzz0McJe8wPj




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think that is the wrong answer.
Edited on Tue Jul-28-09 11:01 PM by RandomThoughts
But I have a responsibility to get a bill to the Senate floor that will get 60 votes that we can proceed toward

His responsibility is not to get a bill that can get passed, it is to get a good bill and try and get it passed.

By his logic, passing a bad crap bill would fit within his responsibility.


I understand it might be semantics but his quote, if it is his quote, is logically incorrect.

There are possibilities of getting a good bill later with merging of House bill. But eventually it is not about getting a bill passed, but about getting a good bill passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Amen...doing nothing would be better then a bill without a public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. More bull shit from Senator Reid. He needs 51 votes, not 60.

What Democratic Senators are going to call him on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Exactly...Maybe he is hoping to overide an Obama veto?


He does not need 60 votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Thirded.
60 for cloture, 51 to pass. He's the fucking majority leader, why does he constantly seem to be trying to make things easier for republicans?

Harry's up for re-election in 2010, BTW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YewNork Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. A veto override would require 2/3 of the Senate or 67 votes, no? Plus 2/3 of the house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Thanks for that clarification.. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. "I will vote for according to my conscience"
Now we all know he sold that long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Senator Reid's "conscience"
Cobwebs

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. More like
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CalGator Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. a clearer photo of it


If it can make him money, he's for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. "I have a responsibility to get a bill to the Senate floor that will get 60 votes"
“What I think should be in the bill is something that I will vote for according to my conscience when we get this bill to the floor,” Reid told reporters today. “But I have a responsibility to get a bill to the Senate floor that will get 60 votes that we can proceed toward.”

Sorry, but 50 + 1 is all you really need. This "we need 60" crap might have flown when you were in the minority but not today. Use the "nuclear" option if you have to. Nothing introduced by the democrats will ever garner any GOP votes anyway, so why this charade?

Why is Reid majority leader? Why is he even a senator? I guess his high lifestyle financed by his medical "contributors" has something to do with it. Reid is an obstructionist. He's blocking the will of the people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. A handful of Republican Senators will only vote for legislation that is doomed to fail
and it will be called a Democratic and Obama administration bill in the 2010 and 2012 elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Corrupt, spineless coward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkkyosemite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. His friggin voice mail box is full yea I bet it's full.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkkyosemite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. and there are times I have to set aside my personal preferences for the good of the Senate and
and I think the country"

To hell with the good of the Senate Reid. You creep tomorrow I will call you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. "..they should understand that principles are in the eye of the beholder.”

..“I think I am an expert on getting things passed,” Reid told the Sun. “And before anyone gets too high and mighty about principles, they should understand that principles are in the eye of the beholder.”...

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/jul/05/reid-has-his-60-probably-not-legislative-lock
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkkyosemite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. We need to get to an org that has money and tell them we want to take to the streets all over
this country now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkkyosemite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. "public option, the most controversial and expensive aspect of President Barack Obama’s health
care push"

There's that word again "controversial" that is what Obama used today to describe Public Option at the AARP Town Hall. I thought that's the first time he has used that word and now in this article.

WE ARE BEING SET UP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkkyosemite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. I wonder if there is some blackmailing going on in DC for the change of change on PO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. Timid, submissive, milquetoast
He sinks everything, every time.

Time for the nuclear option
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
18. Reid should switch parties. . . . . . .He would then guarantee the GOP's defeat (instead of ours).
Edited on Wed Jul-29-09 12:59 AM by Faryn Balyncd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC