Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The GOP health bill (tax cuts, more state liability, vouchers for private Medicaid & tort reform)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 01:45 PM
Original message
The GOP health bill (tax cuts, more state liability, vouchers for private Medicaid & tort reform)
Edited on Wed Jul-29-09 01:47 PM by high density
This seems to take all of the worst things about our current system and magnifies them, especially the idea of having states create insurance pools for people with pre-existing conditions. It seems like a way to sweeten an already sweet deal for the corporate insurance companies while bankrupting state budgets even further. They also hope to handicap Medicaid with a voucher program.

According to the summary, the bill aims to make health care accessible to all Americans by creating tax incentives for consumers to purchase insurance on the individual market, encouraging states to assist consumers with pre-existing conditions, and promoting the employer-based insurance system that is popular with many Americans.

In order to provide coverage for Americans who have pre-existing conditions, the Republican plan proposes giving states incentives, such as federal block grants, to establish high-risk insurance pools. Comparatively, Democrats have proposed regulating insurance companies to prohibit them from denying coverage to people with pre-existing conditions.

The Republican plan also proposes reforming Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) by giving beneficiaries the option of getting a voucher to purchase private insurance. Mr. Obama, in fact, wants to lessen encouragement for private insurer participation in government-run programs like Medicaid and Medicare -- he has proposed eliminating subsidies for private insurers to participate in Medicare Advantage.

The Republican plan also addresses the issue of medical liabilities that doctors face -- something Democrats have not addressed. It would establish in each state administrative health care tribunals, also known as health courts, and add affirmative defense through provider established best practice measures. It would encourage the speedy resolution of claims and caps non-economic damages.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/07/29/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5195904.shtml


I am also interested to learn that the employer-based insurance system is "popular with many Americans."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RDANGELO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. ok.
Lets see the numbers. Run it through CBO. How much will it cut costs? How many more people will it insure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'm going to guess that their ideas are so generic and vague that the CBO wouldn't hazard a guess
The overall feeling I get is that the GOP still denies there is a problem with our health care/insurance industry as it exists currently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RDANGELO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Until they have a real plan,
they won't have any credibility on this issue. I think they are completely misreading the public on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Same old, same old
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaukraut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Doesn't look very cost efficient to me
Federal grants, subsidies, etc etc - all designed to end in private insurance companies' pockets. The "fiscally conservative" republicans strike again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC