The two Democrats running for governor in the closely watched New Jersey and Virginia elections this fall are taking markedly different approaches when it comes to President Barack Obama.
Down by double digits in polls and facing rock-bottom approval ratings, New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine has embraced the president with gusto, regularly invoking his name on the campaign trail and embracing his agenda at every opportunity.
Obama, in turn, has headlined a campaign rally and fundraiser for the embattled incumbent and, in another show of support, last week sent an e-mail to Corzine supporters calling the governor “a great leader” and “a partner” in working to improve the economy.
In Virginia, however, state Sen. Creigh Deeds has taken a different tack. He’s been far more circumspect about his relationship with the president, using him to raise money and win support from the Democratic base but showing little desire to introduce Obama as a central character in his race or make the contest a referendum of the administration’s policies.
The disparate uses of the president reflect each candidate’s unique political calculus and highlight Obama’s strengths and drawbacks in two consequential elections that will reveal the contours of the 2010 political landscape.
“There were over 500,000 new voters that came out to support President Obama in both New Jersey and Virginia, and the trick for any Democratic candidate is to get them to show up again,” said Nathan Daschle, the executive director of the Democratic Governors Association. “And there’s nobody who’s better at getting them out than the president.”
(SNIP)
For Deeds, a longtime state legislator from rural Virginia, the political equation is complicated. During the Democratic primary, Deeds argued he was the most electable Democrat precisely because of his moderate voting record. Establishing a Corzine-like connection with the president could undermine that image.
Instead, on the campaign trail, Deeds talks about how he’s following in the footsteps of Virginia Govs. Tim Kaine and Mark Warner and refers to Obama only sparingly. In his latest fundraising e-mail appeal, which attacks McDonnell for his ties to the Bush administration, he made no mention of Obama.
Deeds has insisted that he wants to keep the focus on statewide issues and avoid distractions about national policies that he has little control over. But it’s not lost on the Deeds campaign that Virginia, which holds its gubernatorial election one year after the presidential election, has a streak dating back to 1977 where that state has voted for a governor from the president’s opposing party.
It’s a delicate balance for the Democratic nominee. While Obama carried Virginia in the general election — making him the first Democratic presidential candidate to do so since 1964 — Deeds is looking to hold onto his own core voters in the rural western swath of the state, where Obama’s activist domestic agenda isn’t viewed as favorably as in other parts of the state.
http://hamptonroads.com/2009/07/va-nj-candidates-diverge-using-obama=====================
=====================
As i've said before; Deeds is really starting to worry me...I never thought I'd regret NOT voting for McAuliffe, but had he won he would have at least been running a much smarter campaign...By the time Deeds wakes up I fear it may be too late...DUers who are keeping track of things in New Jersey can chime in with how that race looks...