Teaser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-30-09 10:27 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Is Max Baucus dumber than a sack of doorknobs? |
mucifer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-30-09 10:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He sure is greedier and eviler than a sack of doorknobs.
|
lurky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-30-09 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-30-09 10:32 PM by lurky
replied to wrong post...
|
Teaser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-30-09 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
The Velveteen Ocelot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-30-09 10:31 PM
Response to Original message |
2. You can't buy votes with a sack of doorknobs. |
rwheeler31
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-30-09 10:32 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Take their money smart, go with the flow smart. |
lurky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-30-09 10:33 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Brass doorknobs or stainless steel? |
tooeyeten
(441 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-30-09 10:33 PM
Response to Original message |
6. he's working for insurance companies |
LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-30-09 10:51 PM
Response to Original message |
8. At least doorknobs know they are suppose to be on doors and help open doors. |
Chipper Chat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-30-09 10:54 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Hey. I have a large sack of doorknobs in my garage. |
|
They are mute but not dumb.
|
geek tragedy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-30-09 10:57 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Not dumb, rather he's evil. |
backscatter712
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-30-09 10:57 PM
Response to Original message |
11. No, he's not dumb. Horribly corrupt and greedy, but not dumb. n/t |
donheld
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-30-09 11:27 PM
Response to Original message |
12. He's more evil than he is dumb |
davidpdx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-30-09 11:41 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Yes and to take it a step further I predict he's going to vote against Sotomayor |
ashling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 02:12 AM
Response to Original message |
14. Any comparison of this scum and doorknobs |
|
does a major disservice to doorknobs
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 02:37 AM
Response to Original message |
15. Not particularly bright- but pretty clearly corrupt |
|
and, while he's got a few too many years to go, I wouldn't put any money on his re-election....
|
TheKentuckian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 04:52 AM
Response to Original message |
16. Average brains with at best, very dicey morals |
|
You can be brilliant and totally wrong as well as wrongheaded. Unka Pat, Darth Cheney, Darth Rumsfeld, and William F. Buckley I'd consider all to be very sharp but certainly twisted and evil. Hitler and Stalin weren't dummies either but they sure were fucked up in the head.
|
TayTay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 07:59 AM
Response to Original message |
17. He is not dumb at all. He is quite good at getting to his goals |
|
I completely disagree with him. I don't trust him at all and have followed his chairmanship with great suspicion.
But he is a long way from dumb. He is a smart guy who understands how to make a deal. We underestimate the guy when we hang a "dumb" label on him. The shenanigans with the Medicare Advantage program in 2007 and the 6:40 pm meeting about MA reform in April of that year foreshadowed all this trouble now with health care. Only no one cared back then.
Baucus is not dumb. Get that through your heads. He is very smart at getting what he wants and knows how to work a room, a crowd and a lobbying group. He didn't become chairman of one of the most important committees in the Congress through dumb luck.
|
Teaser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
18. see my definition of dumb above |
TayTay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. Ah, so it's okay because when challenged |
|
you change the definition of the word.
Clever in a way that is not effective or honest. Sounds like the tactics that Bush used, when challenged pretend you said something else.
|
Teaser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. Thank you for providing my office with a few good laughs this morning. |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-31-09 08:23 AM by Teaser
and they told me I couldn't make someone freakout with one, just-for-fun, bulletin board post.
WIN!
(on edit: last conversation: "I bet I can get another angry post with that one. Just wait")
|
TayTay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. That is what you call a freakout? |
|
Good Lord, a mild rebuke for calling something one thing and then claiming it is another?
I dread to see what kind of guffaws you would get with a full-blown discussion. The hilarity must never cease. Do you have meltdowns over all mild disagreements over word choices? Perhaps you could share the greatest hits on this and tell about how your office reacted to the great "their," "there" and "they're" debate of 2007. Must have resulted in smelling salts and a ban on caffeine where you work.
|
Teaser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
TayTay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
|
Chris Matthews does it better.
That Huh lacked tone, the surprise factor and a certain nasality that would have made it definitive.
It was a subpar effort. Perhaps you could apply yourself in the future and produce a better one.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:15 AM
Response to Original message |