Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Reich on the alleged secret deal: extortion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 07:22 PM
Original message
Robert Reich on the alleged secret deal: extortion

How the White House's Deal With Big Pharma Undermines Democracy

August 9, 2009, 3:16PM

I'm a strong supporter of universal health insurance, and a fan of the Obama administration. But I'm appalled by the deal the White House has made with the pharmaceutical industry's lobbying arm to buy their support.

Last week, after being reported in the Los Angeles Times, the White House confirmed it has promised Big Pharma that any healthcare legislation will bar the government from using its huge purchasing power to negotiate lower drug prices. That's basically the same deal George W. Bush struck in getting the Medicare drug benefit, and it's proven a bonanza for the drug industry. A continuation will be an even larger bonanza, given all the Boomers who will be enrolling in Medicare over the next decade. And it will be a gold mine if the deal extends to Medicaid, which will be expanded under most versions of the healthcare bills now emerging from Congress, and to any public option that might be included. (We don't know how far the deal extends beyond Medicare because its details haven't been made public.)

Let me remind you: Any bonanza for the drug industry means higher health-care costs for the rest of us, which is one reason why critics of the emerging healthcare plans, including the Congressional Budget Office, are so worried about their failure to adequately stem future healthcare costs. To be sure, as part of its deal with the White House, Big Pharma apparently has promised to cut future drug costs by $80 billion. But neither the industry nor the White House nor any congressional committee has announced exactly where the $80 billion in savings will show up nor how this portion of the deal will be enforced. In any event, you can bet that the bonanza Big Pharma will reap far exceeds $80 billion. Otherwise, why would it have agreed?

In return, Big Pharma isn't just supporting universal health care. It's also spending a lots of money on TV and radio advertising in support. Sunday's New York Times reports that Big Pharma has budgeted $150 million for TV ads promoting universal health insurance, starting this August (that's more money than John McCain spent on TV advertising in last year's presidential campaign), after having already spent a bundle through advocacy groups like Healthy Economies Now and Families USA.

I want universal health insurance. And having had a front-row seat in 1994 when Big Pharma and the rest of the health-industry complex went to battle against it, I can tell you first hand how big and effective the onslaught can be. So I appreciate Big Pharma's support this time around, and I like it that the industry is doing the reverse of what it did last time, and airing ads to persuade the public of the rightness of the White House's effort.

But I also care about democracy, and the deal between Big Pharma and the White House frankly worries me. It's bad enough when industry lobbyists extract concessions from members of Congress, which happens all the time. But when an industry gets secret concessions out of the White House in return for a promise to lend the industry's support to a key piece of legislation, we're in big trouble. That's called extortion: An industry is using its capacity to threaten or prevent legislation as a means of altering that legislation for its own benefit. And it's doing so at the highest reaches of our government, in the office of the President.

link


Good grief.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. HOW Did He Miss THIS?
Edited on Sun Aug-09-09 07:32 PM by babylonsister
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8575361

August 8, 2009
Obama Reverses Stand on Drug Industry Deal

By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK

WASHINGTON — Caught between a pivotal industry ally and the protests of Congressional Democrats, the Obama administration on Friday backed away from what drug industry lobbyists had said this week was a firm White House promise to exclude from a proposed health care overhaul the possibility of allowing the government to negotiate lower drug prices under Medicare.

The reversal underscored the delicate balancing act the White House has pursued in its strategy of negotiating behind-the-scenes deals to win industry support without alienating liberal supporters on Capitol Hill.

Pressed by drug industry lobbyists, a White House deputy chief of staff, Jim Messina, confirmed in an e-mail message on Wednesday that the White House shared the drug lobbyists’ interpretation of the deal: that any health care overhaul would not include allowing direct government negotiation of drug prices or require certain additional price rebates. Since Wednesday, other representatives of the White House had also stood by Mr. Messina’s statement as well.

After reading reports about Mr. Messina’s e-mail message, House and Senate Democrats loudly protested that they would not be bound by any such agreement to remove clauses allowing government negotiation of drug prices under Medicare — something Democrats have sought for years.

Several Senate Democrats said Friday that, in a private meeting, White House officials had told them there was no such deal, sowing yet more confusion. House Democratic leaders vowed to fight against it.

Then, after contending for two days that the Senate Democrats had misunderstood the White House aide’s comments, the White House appeared Friday night to back away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think some people on the left
are Bush whipped. Seriously, they're losing their friggin minds.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Mr. Reich needs to read DU more. There were numerous threads. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Umm- maybe I read this differently than you two
Edited on Sun Aug-09-09 09:06 PM by depakid
It's bad enough when industry lobbyists extract concessions from members of Congress, which happens all the time. But when an industry gets secret concessions out of the White House in return for a promise to lend the industry's support to a key piece of legislation, we're in big trouble. That's called extortion: An industry is using its capacity to threaten or prevent legislation as a means of altering that legislation for its own benefit. And it's doing so at the highest reaches of our government, in the office of the President.


Since we don't have the details of "the agreement" it's impossible to know what's actually been proposed or agreed on- but the two "deals" I've heard are on government negotiation (the poison pill in the Medicare Part D scam) and extension of patent monopolies.

Those would be worth a LOT more than $80 billion toward the doughnut hole over time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Huffington Post is whipping them into a frenzy with their big
Drudge-like headlines that mislead and don't tell the real story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I knew I had read something on that just recently
I have to be honest that I don't believe everything I read until a bill is actually about to be voted on, but for someone like Robert Reich not to know about something that shoots a giant hole in his argument is quite bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Thank you, babylonsister
I'm surprised Reich missed the story and hopefully revises his disdain before getting the news... he's a good man and certainly means well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Likely because of timing
Reich likely wrote the op before Obama reverses his position. The two dates are very close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. The White House said "they never made the deal" and
the nyt is saying they "backed away".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. it reeks of Dick's secret meetings with the Energy Co's
except Dick was able to keep it a secret longer.


...feels like we're getting fucked again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. The meetings were held in March to great fanfare......
Edited on Sun Aug-09-09 09:18 PM by FrenchieCat
and the WH listed those in attendance at the time!

Tauzin Attends White House Health Reform Summit;
Reinforces PhRMA’s Commitment to Healthcare Reform

Washington, D.C. (March 5, 2009)
http://www.phrma.org/news_room/press_releases/tauzin_attends_white_house_health_reform_summit/



PHARMA In The Game: Tauzin Pitches Universal Rx Coverage At Health Summit
March 10, 2009
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America President Billy Tauzin got the opportunity to make a case for universal drug coverage to some key congressional and administration players at the White House forum on health reform March 5. Read on...
http://www.biopharmatoday.com/2009/03/-phrma-in-the-game-tauzin-pitches-universal-rx-coverage-at-health-summit-.html




Of course, by July 22nd, dumbass Americans were supposed to have forgotten about the publicized meetings, and so the Media went to work acting like something "secret" had been discovered.....and sooner than soon, many of those dumbasses were comparing Obama to Dick Cheney! :eyes:

White House Releases List of Health Care Officials Paying Visits
Jul 22, 2009
Obama released a list of White House visits by health care ... --Registered lobbyist Billy Tauzin, a former Louisiana congressman who heads the drug industry lobby, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. He went to the White House on March 5, the day of a summit on health care....
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/22/white-house-releases-list-health-care-officials-paying-visits/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just disgusting.
A real low point for the administration, imho.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KakistocracyHater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Sicko" had a woman who had $100 inhaler, $.02 in Cuba
NOT wholesale pricing? The worst, a new "dough-nut hole",
a do-not wholesale meds massacre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhombus Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. I hope this 'deal' is a rope a dope
i.e. Get Big Pharma to lay off for a while, get the bill voted on in both houses, then apply the progressive touch (ie renege on the deal) in the reconciliation process. Voila!

If this is not the White House's strategy, then man, Obama has willfully given away the store.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Me, too
But PhARMA is nothing but extremely sophisticated, much more experienced at this and well funded....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Congress may have already undid it
it was added to the bill in the energy and commerce markup. The question now is will it stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Yes, the '$80 billion over ten years' question. Chump change for PHARMA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
14. Pelosi has suggested if PHARMA agreed to $80 billion they could easily do twice that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well if Reich was in the room, he should've spoken up. And if he wasn't in the room then
it is all speculation. We have enough speculators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC