Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Sanders - You only need 51 Senators and you don't need reconciliation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 03:20 PM
Original message
Sen. Sanders - You only need 51 Senators and you don't need reconciliation

Senator Sanders made a very good point on countdown yesterday:

You only need 51 senators and no filibuster. So if a few Democratic Senators feel compelled to vote against the bill, that won't really be the key. The key is that they do not join the Republicans to filibuster. As long as all the Democrats agree to bring the legislation to a vote only 51 Senators will be needed and the 'reconciliation' end run will not be needed.

Here is a link to send Majority Leader Reid a message a strong message on Caucus discipline - especially on making sure that no Democrats join a Republican filibuster.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6403324
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. That was my thought when Specter crossed the aisle.
I thought that it didn't matter much whether he voted with the Dems, as long as he didn't support a filibuster. The Dems need to force all of the caucus to end any filibuster and then free them to vote however the insurance companies they feel they need to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sadly, we can no longer prevent a filibuster until a replacement
for Teddy shows up... and who knows how long that will take.

If the repukes hang tough, it will only be 59 to vote for cloture right now. And that's not enough. Perhaps we can shame one into voting the way Teddy would have voted, out of respect. But I doubt it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Olympia Snowe would probably join the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. You think?
I'm not doubting you. I just haven't heard anything like this.

It would be great if a few Rs would do the right thing and vote to end a filibuster. Specter, Snowe, and Collins did for the stimulus package. We'd probably need Collins, too, unless Lieberman behaved like a human being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. I think...
She's a "maybe" on supporting the public option and I think she could be talked into it under the circumstances. Specter is for it but he's a Dem. now. I just think Snowe would be one of the "good" ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I hope you're right
Given the R's recent behavior, I can't picture it, but I've been wrong before. I'd love to be wrong this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. Actually there may be a few Republican surprises when it comes to a final bill

If they are in a blue state they can hem and haw and say they will work to lower the deficit elsewhere.

Once it passes and people see how it improves their situation they will have wished that they all voted for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabbat hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
29. I think that
Orin Hatch, being a very close friend to Ted Kennedy, might cross the aisle to end any filibuster, then vote against the bill, knowing it will pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. they will change the law and appoint a temporary Senator


This is the way that the law used to read before the Democrats changed it because Romney was governor.


It will be a little embarassing but a second MA senator will be in place in 5 weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Possibly, but it will take a while to get it done.
And the repukes will scream "political expediancy" and, frankly, they have a case.

They should have never modified it in the first place (when Kerry was running for POTUS).

Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Let them scream. I want them screaming. We need to shove the nuclear option down there damn throats.
No more mr (or mrs) nice guy. Fuck the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabbat hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
30. Can they do that
after the seat is already vacant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. We also need Robert Byrd to show up for such a vote too, which could be a challenge!
Edited on Thu Aug-27-09 03:43 PM by cascadiance
But even with only 58 votes, it seems time to demand that ALL of those 58 vote to bring the bill to the floor. And if they don't fall in line, they then will be targeted in their next primary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Let them filibuster, in fact, make them filibuster! What's the problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. This reminds me when Lieberman said 60 votes were needed to take up the bill on the floor.
He said this unprompted several weeks ago on MSNBC--and with obvious delight, I might add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I wonder how long he woud be kept in the caucus if he voted for a filibuster?

He would vote against the bill and against a filibuster in a NY minute if it meant that he would be stripped of his committee assignemnts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. All the obstacles to a public option are going to come tumbling down. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. I remember reading about this a while back
in principle true, in practice... who knows? Also, now and until and unless MA does the mildly unprincipled but right thing to appoint an interim senator, we no longer have 60 votes :cry:.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. Then pass the damn thing already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. We don't have 60 votes to block a filibuster
We didn't even when Sen. Kennedy was alive, unless Lieberman voted the right way on cloture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. He's suggesting that the dems can vote against the bill but not help filibuster it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Exactly
But we don't have 60 Dems. We never did. We had 58 and two independents who caucus with us. Sanders will vote for cloture. Will Lieberman? Even if Sen. Kennedy were still with us :cry:, we'd still need Lieberman to get to 60.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. So what's the problem?

Let the Republicans filibuster on the Senate floor.

All filibusters end.

We'll get 60 votes to end a filibuster, a real one .... maybe not the first day to two but that's no big thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. Thanks for the link,
done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. k/r
thanks for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurrayDelph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. Why do we need "51"?
After the unfortunate demise of Teddy, there are currently only 99 Senators, so shouldn't the magic number be 50?

Since all it has to be is more than half, if all the Republicans and most of the Blue Cross Dems vote against it, shouldn't it still pass if we get 50/49?

Or am I missing something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Besides, a tie brings in Joe Biden
I think the point is that we don't need 60.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. I anticipate a quick MA replacement

Also Sen Martinez said that he will not be returning but I expect FL to find a quick replacement as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
22. Bernie is THE MAN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
28. Bernie makes sense, as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC