OwnedByFerrets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 07:58 AM
Original message |
Medicare for ALL. Its easy to Define and easy to Defend. |
|
Just how hard is it, IF you really believe it?
|
DangerousRhythm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 07:59 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Seriously. I'm not sure why they didn't go this route to start with. |
|
I mean come on... people NEED simple, it seems. It doesn't get simpler than that.
|
joeycola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 08:00 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Clinton proposed dropping the eligibility for it to 55. He's THE worst!!! nt |
JeanGrey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 08:03 AM
Response to Original message |
quantass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 08:09 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I agree -- this is how the conversation SHOULD have started -- and then let the negotiations begin |
|
if necessary....compromise might have ended up being a strong public option with bipartisan support. Seems like a Sun Tzu strategy if u ask me even if i truly did want a Medicare for All approach in the first place.
|
SpartanDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. You don't think the media would've noticed that he went back on his campaign promise? |
|
if like your insurance you can keep it and questioned him endlessly why he was proposing something completely different.
|
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. ummm medicare for all IF you want it? nt |
OwnedByFerrets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. Did I really NEED to spell out in my headline that |
|
its optional? Its something that is EASILY defined.
|
CreekDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 08:19 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Heck, if we even got to pay the medicare rates for various services it would be better than being uninsured!
|
Historic NY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 08:48 AM
Response to Original message |
7. The 'Kennedy Medicare Reform Bill of 2009.' |
Nicholas D Wolfwood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 09:41 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Just as importantly - easiest to justify through reconciliation. (nt) |
mariawr
(171 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
11. That just makes SO MUCH SENSE... |
|
..why didn't they go that route to begin with? Open up Medicare as the public option? Already has a system in place, young folks could buy in and increase the 'healthy" component-- an alternalive for families--could be streamlined for waste and voila! A no-brainer.
|
Better Believe It
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
21. "They" didn't go that route because it would have been opposed by the insurance and drug industry |
|
I must be a rocket scientist! I figured that one out!
:)
|
OwnedByFerrets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-03-09 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
There's a position waiting for you at NASA.:rofl:
|
IndianaGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:38 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Medicare for all is Single-Payer, which Obama opposes |
|
Obama prefers to burden the already burdened with mandatory insurance premiums, which they can't afford and which will become a bonanza for the health industry.
|
tinrobot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
16. Not really... insurance companies already supplement Medicare. |
phantom power
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 12:01 PM
Response to Original message |
13. It's the easiest thing in the world. |
quantass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message |
14. The ONLY reason to oppose (Medicare For All == Single Payer) is Politics / Donors. A Shame. nt |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-02-09 12:06 PM by quantass
|
slipslidingaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message |
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Absolutely - NOBODY wants to trash Medicare. nt |
OwnedByFerrets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
Bichonpups
(19 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message |
20. I certainly dont want to trash Medicare....... k/r |
|
as a declared 'uninsurable' member of our country, I look forward to having Medicare insurance. I just wish it were available to younger persons who fall into this catagory the insurance companies have put me in.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:48 PM
Response to Original message |