Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 09:57 AM
Original message |
Obama And The Public Option: "I Want An Animal That Looks Like A Duck, Walks Like A Duck And Talks |
|
Like a duck. Right now, as far as I can tell, a duck is the only animal that fits this description. But if you can find another animal that fits this description, I'll accept it."
He's not backing down from a public option. He's looking reasonable and willing to compromise, but in the end, he knows, they won't be able to present him with another animal.
Right now is the time for the BIG PUSH. This whole thing has been timed perfectly. The Repubs have blown their wad WAAAAY early and showed their hand, now Obama comes out w/ the big guns, but don't expect him to be an obnoxious jerk who is OBVIOUSLY ramming his agenda down everyone's throats, that's not his style. He's more subtle. And effective.
|
BeyondGeography
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 09:59 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Little boys and girls in heat, those Pubs |
|
Adult supervision is coming to town.
|
goclark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 09:59 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I want him to say " Yes We Can Have A Public Option!" |
|
Go for it Obama, go for it.
|
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:02 AM
Response to Original message |
ccharles000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:03 AM
Response to Original message |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:04 AM
Response to Original message |
5. I wish our Dems would make Medicare the public option. |
|
I know that's a lot to hope for... given their cowardly/lobbyist-friendly dispositions.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Don't Count That Option Out Just Yet |
|
There's a reason why Anthony Weiner is out there BIG TIME pushing this idea. And he is a FANTASTIC spokesman/salesman. Weiner is pushing this idea HARD, that's by design.
Don't count it out.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
17. I'm still pushing for it. |
|
Like Overseas says downthread... it's the simplest and most common-sense way to go.
|
satya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
46. I wonder if that hasn't been the plan all along; the "compromise" will be ... |
|
to drop the dreaded public option (most of the people opposed to it don't even seem to know what that means) and instead expand and improve Medicare (what I've been wanting all along--some version of HR 676 and Kennedy's 2007 Medicare for All bill). The fools will think they've won -- the "public option" will not be in the final bill.
If the dems had all supported with Medicare for All to begin with, they wouldn't be able to "compromise".
|
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #46 |
68. I've been wondering that myself, lately. The opposition is so fixated |
|
on the 'public option' AND they are so STUPID about it, it would be easy to just dress it up in different clothes, call it 'expanded Medicare' and get the same, exact thing. And it would pass, because it is not the dreaded 'public option'.
I thought we should push for single payer, and then compromise to a strong public option - but this way we push for the demonized public option, and then compromise to 'expanded Medicare' which is, for all intents and purposes, a limited single payer. The structure in place, it would be easy to get to full single-payer in a few more years.
|
joeycola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
59. The administrative structure is in place already=it will save $$. |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #59 |
joeycola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #65 |
67. Thanks. I have read that the single payer-which is Medicare for all has |
|
not been scored by the CBO yet.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #67 |
76. The GAO is working on an analysis now... there's also this: |
joeycola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #76 |
93. Thanks, I did not know for sure.....Who asked him? In the |
|
past Schumer, Rangle have made promises, but I have not seen the actual request.
And, yes, I try to read PNHP often.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #93 |
joeycola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #94 |
Froward69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message |
|
if president Obama is really letting all the chickenhawks squawk. that is let the fight rage on and on. then just simply expand medicare by dropping the "over 65" requirement. with an expanded budget. to pass with a 51 vote majority.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. Yup, I'm Pretty Sure That Idea Is Being Considered |
|
He's played this pretty well so far and that wouldn't surprise me.
|
mopinko
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message |
8. honestly, i would love to see a veto. |
|
send him a plucked chicken and get it thrown back in your faces. i think that would be a game changer, in spite of the fact that it would drag out the whole process. it needs to be done.
|
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Big push, right... So why is he still acting so wishy-washy on a public option? |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-02-09 10:11 AM by high density
That is what I don't understand. You can't have a big push while at the same time failing to define exactly what you want. It's past time for seeking alternatives, we've seen the Republican proposals and they are interested in keeping the status quo.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. You Call It Wishy Washy, I Call It Tactical |
|
He's using a bit of sleight of hand, offering his opponents a false choice.
|
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. A false choice for what? |
|
The people he's playing this game with aren't voting for it, no way, no how. And some people who should support him, like me, are starting to wonder why he's continuing to play a game that nobody else on any side is interested in taking part in.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
19. WTF Are You Talking About? |
|
Whenever he gives a speech he's talking to everyone, including his opponents. He's looking reasonable and willing to compromise, meanwhile, he will not accept anything except a Public Option, that's the way I see it. You think he'll cave, that's your opinion, but his language tells me he's got goals, one's that can only be reached through a public option and he knows that, but it looks like he's giving his opponents a choice to present him with something else, as long as it meets his goals.
|
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
24. Well we can disagree on tactics I guess. |
|
Three or four months into the argument now, I see no reason why a White House would be still acting like there is a "false choice" out there that doesn't exist. As you said in your OP, it's time for the "big push," and that can't happen until the White House decides what track is going to take. It can't do a big push on a thought process of, "I like this, but, maybe if you tell me something else, I'll go with that."
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
29. "I like this, but, maybe if you tell me something else, I'll go with that." |
|
That's not what he's fucking saying. He's saying "What I want NEEDS to accomplish THESE SPECIFIC THINGS and a Public Options does that."
|
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
34. So I guess we agree, at this point... |
|
Obama should now be saying, "A public option does what I want. I want a public option. I will veto all legislation that does not have a public option." Given where we are today, what more is there to say? You have concluded there is no other choice but the public option. I agree. I'd just like to hear Obama talk realistically instead of playing some unsuccessful mind game on the Republicans.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #34 |
37. I'm Glad Obama Listens To His Own Counsel |
|
And not yours. So far, his timing has been impeccable.
So, basiclly your argument is "I want Obama to do things MY WAY!! WAHHHH!!!! HE'S NOT LISTENING TO ME!!!!"
|
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #37 |
43. I just want Obama to honestly tell me what he's doing. |
|
If that's too much of a demand then I guess I am a crybaby.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #43 |
47. I Bet You Want To See Everyone's Cards When You Play Poker |
|
Sucks for you.
He's told you. He wants to ACHIEVE A SPECIFIC SET OF GOALS. He can see one way to get there. The public option. But is willing to consider something else (wink wink) if it achieve's those goals (there's nothing else, get it?).
You don't trust him. Fine, I get that. That's your issue. Use it. You want a public option, so do I. Shout about it. I'm all for making him do it. In fact, that's what Obama almost certainly wants. Be loud about it. Make him do it.
|
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #47 |
64. Of course I get what you're saying. |
|
I just don't want the President "playing poker" with me, or my health care. I don't see the need for the political games since the Republicans have blown their load already and told us that they'll vote no on everything. I am not happy being in the dark on this, and the bulk of America is confused as well. (See the poll in LBN.) No, we can't see the future and I realize that. I just don't understand, with the information I have right now, how Obama's incomplete map can take us between here and the public option plan that he wants. Can't you admit it's a normal reaction to be worried about that? For sure I hope it works, it's just an uncomfortable place to be in right now. It's not about trust, it's about telling us what's going on.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #64 |
66. Yes, It's Normal To Be Worried |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-02-09 10:55 AM by Beetwasher
And after the last eight years, your cynicism is probably warranted and healthy. But don't let it color everything you see.
Obama is in a "game" whether he wants to be or not. He has to play the hand he's dealt and swim in the waters he's in. He's proved himself adept at least so far, IMO.
Use your cynicism, use your worry and fight for the public option, now is the time and Obama needs our support. I believe he wants a public option and I will fight for one knowing if we show up, he will come through.
Don't let my brusque manner put you off by the way, I'm just an asshole. I understand why people are worried and cynical, I'm merely pointing out that there are other ways to look at what's going on aside from the cynical one.
|
joeycola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #37 |
44. He has too many corporate people as his counsel. |
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #44 |
joeycola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #49 |
58. It is hard to have an intelligent conversation with such comments. |
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #58 |
60. You Were Engaging In Intelligent Conversation? |
joeycola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #60 |
62. Keep your head in the sand. Bye for now. |
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #62 |
ladywnch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #44 |
83. keep your friends close and your enemies closer |
|
pick the ins corps minds so you know what kind of shit they're going to try and push so you can counter it
|
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #34 |
74. That's just the thing - he's NOT changing the goal, but what it is called. |
|
So they won't pass a 'Public Option' - we'll let them accept 'expanded Medicare' instead.
It walks like a duck, talks like a duck, looks like a duck - you can call it a penguin, but it's still a duck.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #74 |
75. Correct, He Can Do This Too |
|
Use bait and switch for OUR side for once.
|
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
70. Heads, we win - tails, you lose. |
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #70 |
|
If I want something from you, but don't want to demand it, I'd say, "give me something that meets all these requirements", knowing there's only one thing that does. You seemingly have a choice, but you don't because there's only one thing that fits my requirements.
|
Overseas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Medicare for all who choose it is that animal. |
|
No cockamamie coops. No ten more years planning and phasing in some new complex public plan.
Medicare for all who choose it. Easy to explain. MIXTURE of public and private elements. Medical services privately delivered-- between you and your doctor. Payments and cost controls publicly administered, accountable to us all. Very popular program-- high patient satisfaction. Infrastructure already in place to expand upon.
If legislators can't resist phasing in then start with 50+ because we are subjected to the strongest age discrimination with regard to premium pricing.
|
Enrique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:11 AM
Response to Original message |
13. co-ops could fit that description n/t |
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
You can't because they don't.
|
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
18. Evidence? Since Obama is so nebulous on this issue, it's impossible to know what he's thinking. |
|
I would not have believed you if you told me a year ago that this White House would be so balled up on managing its message on such a large issue.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
20. Read The Fucking Posts |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-02-09 10:20 AM by Beetwasher
The poster said a co-op could work like a public option. I asked for evidence that a co-op can accomplish the same things as a public option. Pay attention.
|
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. I read the fucking post, and like I said, we can't know what Obama is thinking about co-ops |
|
Maybe they do fit his "duck." You and I don't fucking know, because Obama won't fucking tell us.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
25. He's Told Me, You're Not Listening |
|
He's laid out exactly what he wants to accomplish and has said right NOW ONLY A PUBLIC OPTION fits the bill. You think he hasn't heard about co-ops yet? Seriously, pay attention. I know, maybe it's difficult with your agenda, but it's right there.
He has said, very clearly, his duck is the public option.
|
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-02-09 10:27 AM by high density
I am just wondering why Barack Obama, supreme orator, is acting like such a lightweight on this very important piece of HIS plan. You can disagree with me on that, but I am not convinced on his position at all.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
30. Your "Lightweight" Is My Master Tactician |
|
And your agenda is clear when you keep using terms like "lightweight".
|
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
36. Well I donated many hours to Obama, many dollars |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-02-09 10:33 AM by high density
I support the man but he's been a disaster when it comes to selling his public option. You can infer I'm a freeper or whatever, but that's not at all where I'm coming from. I just want some honest talk from him on the issue that is frank and succinct. He is not instilling confidence on this issue at all.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
|
Results are what matters. There's not even a final bill yet, but that doesn't stop some people from complaining about what they fantasize it will look like.
|
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #38 |
41. I used that excuse in my mind for the month of August |
|
My hope for good results diminishes with every passing day of this shitstorm that the White House has left swirling around the health reform issue.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #41 |
42. Your Sense Of Timing Is Horrendous |
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #42 |
45. I think you're way overconfident in your own gauge on the situation |
|
But whatever floats your boat.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #45 |
48. I Think You Underestimate Obama |
|
And don't trust him. That's your issue.
|
Enrique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
28. no, I was NOT saying co-ops can work like a public option |
|
I'm saying that Obama can point to them as an alternative that could satisfy his demands. He could say co-ops "walk like a duck, etc."
If he were committed to the public option, imo he would say so. And imo, he's not, he could settle for co-ops.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
31. Bullshit, Coops Have Been Floated For A While |
|
He knows about them and he's STILL specifically saying ONLY a public option meets his goals.
|
Enrique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #31 |
51. I didn't know that he's insisting on a public option |
|
I thought he said the public option was NOT central to what he is demanding.
If it's true that he's saying he must have a public option, then that changes everything.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #51 |
|
He has laid out a specific set of goals that can only be achieved through a "public option". He knows it's the only way to get where he has said he wants to go.
He IS insisting on it, but not beating people over the head w/ his insistence.
|
Enrique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #54 |
69. so he's not specifically saying only the public option meets his goals |
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #69 |
71. Yes, He Is, Pay Attention |
|
Good grief. Way to be intentionally obtuse. That's exactly what he's saying. He's challenging his opponents to come up with something that doesn't exist.
|
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #51 |
77. He didn't say it was not central - he said that it wasn't the ENTIRETY of |
|
healthcare reform.
And he's right. Coming up with a public option but not touching the pharma companies profiteering makes for a FAILED public option. There are a lot of things that are siphoning money out of healthcare that having a public option wouldn't touch, so the public option is not, in his words, the entirety of the debate, but it is still central to reform, and any reform without a public option - or 'expanded medicare', or whatever you wish to call it - will not fly and will not reform.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #77 |
79. Yup, Making Sure People W/ Existing Conditions Are Covered Is ALSO A HUGE Part Of Reform |
|
Just as an example. A public option is one piece.
People w/ agenda's like to read all sorts of things into everything Obama does or doesn't say.
|
MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:17 AM
Response to Original message |
16. And What Would You Expect Him To Say If He Were Fleeing From A Public Option? |
|
There's nothing I want more than to see Obama use his formidable skills to push for a public option - but everything I see is consistent with how a politician would flee from a previous position.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
21. Well, You Would See It That Way |
|
That's not surprising in the least.
|
MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
23. Perhaps You Can Answer My Question |
|
What would he do differently if he were actually fleeing from it?
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
26. What Would He Do If He Had Super Human Powers |
|
And laser beams could shoot from his eyes?
|
MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #26 |
33. I'm Guessing That You Don't Like The Answer |
|
Which is why you're being silly.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
39. LOL! Your Question Is Idiotic And Deserved Only Ridicule |
|
In fact, you deserve only ridicule.
|
MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #39 |
|
Because that will wear off in hours. The alternative is unsettling.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #56 |
demwing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
|
He MIGHT say something like "Let's take Public Option off the table. I don't like it. It won't work for the goals I've set forth, and here's why (A, B, and C). Now, let's look at the equation differently and see what else we can come up with."
And so far, I've heard NOTHING from Obama that comes even close to that type of message regarding potentially dropping the public option, have you?
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #78 |
80. Don't Bother, That Poster Has A Clear And Obvious Agenda, He's A Hater Through And Through |
|
And there's nothing you can say to him that will change that. He's deserving only of ridicule.
|
rudy23
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:30 AM
Response to Original message |
32. Sounds like he's preparing us to accept something else. |
|
Then convince us it's the same thing.
Still waaaaay too wishy-washy for me to think this is his way of "pushing" for a public option. Sounds like the exact opposite.
I really, really hope I'm wrong.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
35. Yeah, I Know Some People Really Want To See It That Way |
|
That cynicism is there own problem as far as I'm concerned.
|
rudy23
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #35 |
50. Like I said, I hope I'm wrong. That cynicsism is a callous formed by disappointment since 2006 |
|
about the nature of the Democratic Party as it exists in Washington D.C.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #50 |
52. Understandable, Use It |
|
Be loud. Make him do it. It's what he wants.
|
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
81. And I think that's bass ackwards - |
|
he's willing to accept a name change, then convince the opposition that it is NOT the dreaded 'public option'.
You know how stupid the anti-healthers and teabaggers are.
DEFEAT OBAMA! DEFEAT THE PUBLIC OPTION! DEMAND MEDICARE FOR ALL!
We get what we need, while they think they've won because they defeated a brand name 'public option'.
|
rudy23
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #81 |
87. I would love it if you were right. The presence of Rahm Emanuel and other DLCers in his cabinet |
|
gives me serious doubts.
I do hope you're right, that would be a very sly way to achieve victory. I just haven't seen much from him that indicates he's on our side.
|
demwing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
82. Forgetting the word "pushing" |
|
Think of it in chess terms. You don't push your opponent off the board, you slowly take away their pieces, one by one, until the only thing left for them to do is lose or quit.
|
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #82 |
|
A chess analogy.
You're in for it now.
|
rudy23
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #82 |
88. The problem is while he's playing chess, the other side is using Ultimate Fighting tactics. |
|
What's the point of playing great chess while the other side beats the shit out of you?
|
demwing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #88 |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-02-09 01:19 PM by demwing
Well they suck at it, that's all I can say. The birthers and teabaggers drive me crazy, I admit it, but are they really being that effective?
The only problem I see is that there are a bunh of Chicken Little's running around squeeking, and they're not saying that the sky will fall, but that it already has. Nonsense.
Obama has always made some of us worry. I was in that group durring. I wanted him to fight Clinton with more intensity. I thought he was losing it. I was wrong.
And every time the worriers come along and say Obama is blowing it, he has proven them wrong, and been a step.5 ahead.
Did he suddenly lose his mojo? Nope. Same game, different name.
|
graywarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-02-09 10:45 AM by Beetwasher
He fits the "bill". A Public Option or the duck gets it!
|
graywarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #55 |
61. If iot can get through the tangled web of republican lies, then we'll be down with our bad selfs. |
OneGrassRoot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
|
:spray:
:rofl:
:applause:
|
kjackson227
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message |
84. I'll be calling, emailing, and will donate (as much as I can) for the... |
|
next two weeks. I urge you all to do the same. It's getting down to the wire and we've got to keep fighting!
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message |
85. The way the Republic is set up, those Senators have a lot of power |
|
We have to quit thinking of the President as a left wing "decider." We didn't like it when Bush claimed that power; we have to stop complaining at Obama for following the Constitution as to his powers.
If those Senators don't want it and don't vote for it, we don't get it.
|
LittleBlue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message |
89. Can this man refer to something clearly instead of making duck analogies? |
|
Can we get some clear, concrete statement as to what he is looking for?
|
scheming daemons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #89 |
joeycola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #89 |
tsuki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-02-09 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |
96. I am waiting for, "Yes, We Can, and DID." |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:37 AM
Response to Original message |