Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservatives Tie Obama Education Speech to Bill Ayers, Hugo Chavez

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:14 PM
Original message
Conservatives Tie Obama Education Speech to Bill Ayers, Hugo Chavez
http://washingtonindependent.com/57868/conservatives-tie-obama-speech-to-bill-ayers-hugo-chavez

Conservatives Tie Obama Speech to Bill Ayers, Hugo Chavez
By David Weigel 9/4/09 11:59 AM


If you want to understand where the truly unexpected “Obama will indoctrinate our kids” controversy came from, look no further than the latest column by Michelle Malkin. She begins by mocking “the sneering defenders of Barack Obama who can’t fathom the backlash” and cites, as WorldNetDaily cited, an August 28 assembly at Eagle Bay Elementary School in Farmington, Utah, in which celebrities pledged to “be of service to Barack Obama.”

Then she nails her culprit: Bill Ayers.

Obama served with Weather Underground terrorist and neighbor Bill Ayers on the Chicago Annenberg Challenge education initiative. Downplaying academic achievement in favor of left-wing radical activism in the public schools is rooted in Ayers’ pedagogical philosophy. Obama served as the program’s first chairman of the board, while Ayers steered its curricular policy. The two oversaw grants to welfare rights enterprise ACORN and to avowed communist Michael Klonsky — a close pal of Ayers and member of the militant Students for a Democratic Society. SDS served as a precursor to the violent Weather Underground organization.

As investigative journalist Stanley Kurtz reported, Klonsky and Ayers teamed up on the so-called “small schools movement” to steer schoolchildren away from core academics to left-wing politicking on issues of “inequity, war and violence.”

A cadre of like-minded educators and national service administrators across the country share the same core commitment to transforming themselves from imparters of knowledge to transformers of society. The “change” agenda trains students to think only about what they should do for Obama — and rarely to contemplate how his powers and ambitions should be limited and restrained.


The smoking gun? A 2006 speech by Ayers in Caracas, a secret so deep that it’s, err, posted on Ayers’ Website. While the White House’s clumsy rollout of the speech (its original questions for students, about how they could “help the president”) sparked the controversy, this is what’s fueling it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I swear, they must all be smoking crack or something...
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. They know all about a speech they haven't heard yet!
Yo michelle don't "backlashes" occur after something happens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Michelle Malkin isn't dumb. She wants to get paid. Most right wing leaders are intelligent, but
there is a big market for making shit up and saying outrageous shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. There was nothing wrong with the questions that "could help the President"
Its just that the RW in this country have fallen so far off the deep end they will despise anything Obama does. They really hate being out of power and are pissy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah, "your'e either for us or against us" is much more patriotic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. God! What sour grapes paranoia! We have a country to save!
Michelle Malkin is a silly chicken little, who is clucking loudly about a man who wishes to repair the 8 years of Republican and free from conscience corporate domination, while the economy,environment,world conflict, and the price of health care eats us alive.

It's time to get out of this silly fearful stagnate phase.

Shut-up,baby RW'rs! It's time to make our country BETTER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Conservatives or republicans?
Edited on Fri Sep-04-09 01:28 PM by LaPera
"conservatives" is a much nicer name the republicans love & prefer, like GOP, righties or right-wing....as opposed to mean ugly cold-hearted Republicans....Republicans is the name republicans don't want to be labeled as ...But after all every "Conservative" GOP, Righties and/or Right-wing asshole votes fucking republican!

Call them what they are fucking Republicans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. even though I have no children, I called the largest school district in my area to complain
the superintendent is leaving it to the individual schools (copout, as he is new) and this
is one of the reddest counties in the country, so guess what? told him I am sick that my
taxes are paying for pandering to the ignorant, stupid, reactionary reichwingers in this
county. don't think they like me much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. The sad truth is that many of the people that are being fed this crap have the potential
for violence

I also have no doubt that a large majority of those that subscribe to this are racist, and that is their real impetus for this so-called anger



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wow, they are more threatened by Bill Ayers
than by Osama bin Laden, I'd wager.

A guy who gave up and renounced what he did 30 years ago is more terrifying and frightening to the teabagging Neanderthal morons than Osama fucking bin Laden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC