Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UPDATED: How will Rupert Murdoch justify not covering Obama's address to Congress next week?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 09:18 PM
Original message
UPDATED: How will Rupert Murdoch justify not covering Obama's address to Congress next week?
http://mediamatters.org/blog/200909040046


UPDATED: How will Rupert Murdoch justify not covering Obama's address to Congress next week?

September 04, 2009 9:24 pm ET by Eric Boehlert


Fox TV makes it official: It's refusing to air president Obama's address to a joint-session of Congress next week. Since Murdoch's media outlet has effectively transformed itself into the Opposition Party of the Obama White House, this move fits into their political attack machine.

Of course, placed in proper context, the idea that a media company has decided to so blatantly play a hardball brand of partisan politics is nothing less than shocking. But don't look for reporters to make much of Murdoch's snub. Look for it to reported as an "expected" move. Like it's normal for the fourth largest television outlet in the country to uniformly refuse to air any presidential appearances scheduled in primetime. (If NBC, for instance, had ever snubbed Bush when he addressed Congress would the news have been reported with a shoulder shrug? Riiiight.)

Two questions. Did Fox TV ever refuse to air one of president Bush's joint-session speeches? Indeed, has any U.S. TV network ever refused to air presidential speech before Congress?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are they airing the GOP rebuttal?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Haha! I hope so!
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. But there is no American Idol on!!!!!!!
Edited on Fri Sep-04-09 09:21 PM by Jennicut
I actually watch American Idol but seriously, what is more important then the President's address to the Congress? Now if it was a Rethug Faux TV would most certainly run it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. How will the individual affiliates justify their "public service" obligation?
Fox the network may not be doing the coverage, but affiliates have the right to pre-empt the network and carry anything they like. Locally WGHP is in competition with WFMY and WXII - and if WFMY and WXII take Presidential addresses, WGHP will as well - it's a former ABC station, with good ratings that were retained with the switch from ABC to Fox when Fox purchased WGHP - subsequently Fox has sold WGHP.

If this matter was taken up carefully then I'm sure that there would be some poor affiliate who would have to face a license challenge with the FCC for various violations to serve the public good.

Mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. If this causes a mess for the wingnutiest stations then so be it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I don't think they are involved. No one now is forced to do anything. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Fuck Fox and its viewers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hopefully he will go bankrupt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's time they were forced to stop using their "Fair and Balanced" BULLSHIT slogan. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC