Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joe Klein: Rookie Mistakes: Time for Obama to Lead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:20 PM
Original message
Joe Klein: Rookie Mistakes: Time for Obama to Lead
Thursday, Sep. 03, 2009
Rookie Mistakes: Time for Obama to Lead
By Joe Klein
TIME

Well, we survived August, which is good news. It was not a month that will be recorded in the Enlightened Discourse Hall of Fame. In fact, it was a national embarrassment — not just the steady stream of misinformation about the nature of President Obama's health-care proposals, but the racism — both overt and opaque — the death threats, the imprecations (calling someone a Nazi is evidence of the evil of banality), the idiots bearing assault rifles at presidential events. As the lunatics took over the asylum, the President's poll ratings dropped, and the chances for a truly bipartisan health-care-reform effort vanished, if they existed in the first place. Consequently, we have had a back-to-school fusillade of advice for the President from my columnizing peers — and an effusion of premature crowing from conservatives about the collapse of the Obama presidency.

(snip)

Barack Obama is investing in health-care reform. We are at the point of the legislative process where all seems hopeless, but Obama should be heartened by the fact that most of his Republican adversaries oppose the bill for crass political rather than ideological reasons. They assume that if it passes, his investment of political capital will result in higher poll numbers — which means they assume the public will like the changes he is proposing. And, I fearlessly predict, the public will. If insurance companies can no longer deny coverage for pre-existing conditions, or drop people who get too sick, the public will love it. If health-care exchanges give individuals and small businesses the power to negotiate lower premiums from the insurance companies, people will love that too. Making health care available to everyone, even if some people — young, healthy people — who are not buying in now are told they have to join up, will also be well received. The odds are better than even that a bill containing those provisions will pass in Congress this fall.

But even if most of the noise about Obama is nonsense, there is one area of concern that could affect the ultimate success of his presidency. It is his tendency to overlearn the lessons of past presidencies, especially when those lessons enable him to avoid taking responsibility for tough decisions. It has been widely observed that Obama overlearned the lesson of the Clinton health-care effort by deferring to Congress to write the legislation. It has been less widely observed that the President overlearned the lesson of Bush's hyperpoliticized Justice Department by leaving to Attorney General Eric Holder the decision about whether to investigate the CIA for torture abuses.

What should the President have done? Well, there's a path between the 1,300-page Clinton health-care plan and the 1,000-page Henry Waxman plan that will be voted on in the House. The President could have laid out a set of principles and said, "I will veto any bill that doesn't contain the following ..." (Indeed, he still could do so.) They should be clear, simple, popular and achievable. My list would include insurance reform, health-care exchanges, near universal coverage and tort reform. (Obama's position on tort reform is another abdication of responsibility: he says he's open to it, knowing the congressional Democrats are closed to it.)

The President's deferral of responsibility for the CIA investigation is more serious than his health-care meanderings. This is a matter of national security that will directly affect the morale and behavior of our clandestine services. The President can't say he wants to look forward, not backward, then allow his Attorney General to look backward. The most egregious practices, like waterboarding, were (outrageously) declared legal by the Bush Justice Department. How can you prosecute one interrogator for threatening a prisoner with an electric drill and let others who waterboarded a prisoner 83 times off the hook? Is it right for the interrogators to be prosecuted and the real miscreants — people, like former Vice President Dick Cheney, who ordered, and still approve of, the torture — to escape unpunished? Most legal experts believe that such cases would be difficult to prosecute. But whether you favor an investigation or not, this is a presidential decision the President avoided.

In the great sweep of history, this presidency has barely begun. The mistakes Obama has made are rookie mistakes that can be corrected. And the general tendency of his Administration — toward civility, as opposed to the ugliness we've seen in the past month — is the right one. But he can't allow his desire for civility to neuter the requirements of leadership. He has to lead, clearly and decisively, starting right now.


http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1920050,00.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. He has to lead, clearly and decisively, starting right now.
AMEN TO THAT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama can now go forward with healthcare reform! (It's kind of urgent!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. "He has to lead, clearly and decisively, starting right now."!! Bravo!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. When Joe gets himself elected President
Then I'll value his opinion more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thank You!
:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeffbr Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. You don't have to be a chef to comment on bad food
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Well said, and welcome to DU (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Purely a matter of taste
Not facts.

You've fallen hook line and sinker for the idea that politics is entertainment. What one person likes another doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Then you need to tell this to the many on DU who keep on criticizing
Obama.

Worse, many are already looking for other candidates for 2012 and many regret their votes last year.

And then we have others who switched their registration to independent and than have the audacity to demand that the Democratic Congress and the Democratic president vote this way or else..

I think that this was a sober analysis with which most Democrats who want Obama to succeed agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. getting elected Pres doesn't prove anything my friend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kick. It is amazing how many would disagree with such a commentary
We are like the freepers, operating in black or white. Some either disagree so much with Obama that they are planning the 2012 challenger; others won't hear a word of disagreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yep this country is insanely polarized these days, even within groups of supposedly the
same political leanings. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. And this is why it is futile to try to compare LBJ, or Carter
or even Reagan and papa Bush, even Clinton. We did not have the viral videos and blogs that spread like wildfire and prevented any middle of the road, any compromise.

Look how angry DUers are at any hint of a compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. And the MSM was far more impartial. Lots more talking heads now that
are all about screaming out a screed. Even the anchors seem to editorialize an awful lot.

Our nation's culture is so very different now. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC