Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It looks like the Obama admin. beat the media!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:12 AM
Original message
It looks like the Obama admin. beat the media!
The media has been doing its best to try to get Obama to back off a public option. First, they showed every town hall meeting that had "constituents" (yeah, right) shouting about how angry they were about the government "taking over health-care."

Then after that, they thought they managed to get the public option replaced with "co-ops" and they started discussing how THEY would work in place of a public option that "obviously" had no support (yeah, right). Then for the past week or so, they started talking about how the public option is somehow back, but with a "trigger" to please Olymia Snowe and "maybe some other moderate Republicans (yeah, right).

But today, on the Sunday shows, the admin. officials were out talking about how Obama will make a case for a public option Wed. night. All the interviewers could do was "point out" to them that there's no SUPPORT for a public option (yeah, right), asking how it will be possible to get this passed in Congress. Obama's people held strong and said Obama will explain why a public option is important to keep costs low and insurance companies honest.

Now the media is forced to talk about the public option again-no co-ops, no triggers. Obama won ONE fight already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. There was no coherent message
Gibbs says yes to PO, Axelrod says it's negotiable.

So we had another week of no coherent message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You also compared Obama to Hoover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. He's most definitely the WEAKEST president since Hoover
Edited on Sun Sep-06-09 11:23 AM by WeDidIt
And I stand by that statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. We shall see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Duly noted.
Well okay then. That sure speaks volumes about your credibility on things Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. And his/her credibility of historical knowledge in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. The longer you stand by a statement like that, the more your credibility is damaged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Thanks for the Sunday morning laugh.
Edited on Sun Sep-06-09 11:32 AM by tridim
:rofl:

Unfortunately I can't really pin this one the media because you already claimed that daily media spin is an illusion and just a RW talking point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. CAPS CAPS CAPS CAPS CAPS CAPS
Not sure how to even respond, but it should be in caps and 72 point font.

You are saying Obama is the weakest President since Hoover?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. How was Hoover weak?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. While I understand your point, it is naive.
Obama, had he come out swingin' would be an angry black man. Had Hillary won, and come out swingin', she would have been a bitch. We are running candidates with vestigial stigma's. Expecting Obama to make all the moves, the people have doen squat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
55. Or maybe they shouldn't waste time worrying about how they'll be percieved...
...and just fucking do what's right? Seriously, seems like democrats can come up with a million excuses for why they had to fuck up delivering on their promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
30. You must have had different history classes then I did
I read that Hoover stuck to his guns and claimed that government shouldn't do anything about the economic crisis. That was dumb, but he certainly wasn't weak.

How was Hoover weak? He did exactly what he wanted to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. He wasn't weak.
He was wrong.

Big difference.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. He and his entire party got their asses handed to them in '32.
That's pretty fucking weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. So did the Republicans in 2006 and 2008
Why do you not consider Bush a weak president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. He still got his tax cuts
when his party was the minority in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. But Hoover didn't have problems in Congress
He didn't WANT them to act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Which is pretty fucking weak. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. So getting Congress to do what you want is weak?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. No, combining a do nothing congress with a do nothing adminsitration
Edited on Sun Sep-06-09 12:40 PM by WeDidIt
is weak.

Adn we're about to see it happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. He WASN'T a do nothing president though
That wasn't the problem. His problem was that he believed strongly in volunteerism over legislation.


He did plenty, including having Mexicans and Mexican Americans forcibly removed and sent back to Mexico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. Please give me your definition of "weak"
Not an example. An actual dictionary definition, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Let me add to this:
I see two possibilities.

Case 1: you are using the term "weak" to mean "ineffectual" or implying that said president couldn't get his legislation passed. In this case you are incorrect because that wasn't Hoover's problem.

Case 2: you are using the term "weak" to mean "bad". If that is the case, you REALLY think Obama is worse than Reagan and the Bush boys?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
39. ha ha ha ha ha.....
too early in the day to start huffing glue my man...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
44. You get the award for the lamest and least true statement yet.
If he's so weak, how is it that he's accomplished more in 8 months than any of his predecessors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
50. You are full of FAIL
your username smacks of irony since you obviously have done nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. I love that...
"...full of FAIL." :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
54. Wow, 8 months into a 4 year term for you to say that? You really are hilarious.
Seriously. I'm :rofl: over here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
41. You didn't understand..all you do is look for
negative shit and twist it around to meet your own little agenda.

Anyone who sucks up the corporatemediawhore Shit deserves the Burn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
52. I just saw Axelrod on MTP and he said no such thing.
Can you show me a quote/transcript of him saying a PO is negotiable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. They may have beat the media but they didn't beat Glen Bleck
they caved in faster to that son of a bitch than I don't know what. I'm really dissapointed in Obama right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. It is disturbing - the other side never caves, but our guys...
...cave at the drop of a hat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
57. "our guys" walk away...and
they need to keep doing that.

I would think President Obama has back-up for all of his appointed staff because it's not worth wasting time on the faux hysteria that is being manufactured by the propaganda arm of corporate media. It's like town-hall bologna, everyone is sick of it.

Push the agenda and when cm focuses on and piles on the designated outrage du jour leave them behind with new players already in position to move policy forward. People watching the reruns (Obama/dems this, that, or the other...blah, blah) aren't paying attention.

oh, look, what's that? it's another media kerfluffle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. They CAVED to Glen Beck, just as they appear to be caving now...
Seems that Faux, Beck, Nelson, Conrad, B. Lincoln, and the other swine have figured out that there is no threat coming from this gang of amateurs.

What a sad state of affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. Well, that's true, but if Van Jones had stayed, he probably would've been
a distraction-another person for the RW to get all "Reverend Wright" on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
46. Are you going to contact them about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. The AP is still fighting back.
They really did a spin job on what was said this morning and made it seem like the admin. officials were willing to give up the public option by using it as a bargaining chip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
10. That is what has been the media's strategy all along because..
we all know that they are part of the republiCON party. The media's talking heads who report what is going on day to day always throw out the rightwing talking points then tell us the public option is dead.

Some of the easily led believe their story line, as though there are none on the other side who believe in a public option. The media always shows the side that is against the public option in their reports,then say it over and over again and then all of the media outlets runaway with it as though the bill has been written as their lies were the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
12. I was not encouraged by the Gibbs and Axelrod appearances..
They seemed TO ME to make it clear that what is left of the public option is more than open to negotiation and outright elimination.

Maybe you saw different shows this morning?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Here, Axelrod has a message for you and
the AP.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. His words are weasel words. No insistence, no strength behind them.
As I have put it elsewhere:


"Would be" is a future conditional construction, which leaves open the possibility of accepting a no-public-option plan.

(A stronger statement would be something IS.{/b}

"Valuable" as a modifier of 'tool" is equally WEAK, it does not by any means translate into "essential. "fundamental," or "critical."

Anyone with a remotely objective ear can tell that this was a weak endorsement, at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Your comment is incoherent drivel.
Edited on Sun Sep-06-09 11:47 AM by ProSense
Axelrod: "In no way did I back off our position"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
58. "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain..." nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
26. But YOu wouldn't be encouraged if the baby Jesus came down and sat on Obama's shoulder
So there's that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #12
28. Katrina Vanden Heuvel was. She said, after hearing Gibbs, she thinks Obama will
make clear that we need a public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. It's clear from some of the reactions to this episode
Edited on Sun Sep-06-09 12:03 PM by ProSense
that there are people on the left (if they really are) ready to distort Obama's message regardless of what he says.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Ain't THAT the truth?
Some of them will NEVER be happy with Obama and will do or say anything to make him look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
43. I have come to the conclusion that we spent too much time out of power
That for "some" of us..the only way they function is in the negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
48. You obviously wouldn't be encouraged by anything that was said.
Your mind is made up and is against Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #48
59. Nonsense. I like Obama and want him to succeed.
He is frustrating the crap out of me though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. this admin isn't ahead of sh..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. Thanks for your intelligent input.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
17. Stop trashing Obama, start trashing CNN nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. AND ESPECIALLY AP ... lying sacks of shit nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
42. I love it when the media has to eat crow... without salt..
GOOD OP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. So do I...
especially when I'M about to eat brisket with salt AND pepper! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
56. the media won't talk about the details. They have and will focus on Obama's poll #s and Van Jones
They never HAVE to focus on what is important and I believe they never will. It's not in their corporate interest to be realistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC