Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If there isn't a strong public option in the final bill that lands on Obama's desk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 11:51 PM
Original message
Poll question: If there isn't a strong public option in the final bill that lands on Obama's desk
should he veto it or sign it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. It depends on what else is in the bill.
Thus begins the sound of my broken record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I agree with you. A public option is probably the least important
component of any bill to me. I am much more concerned with convering uninsured, offering sufficient subsidies for lower income individuals and families and ending discrimination on individuals with pre-existing conditions. If a bill does all that, I really don't care whether it has a public option or option with a trigger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. To be fair, a public option would address all of those concerns. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. it would address those concerns..only if it passes
if it doesn't pass, then some alternative actions that can pass are necessary. but an all or nothing option will not help those currently on the verge of bankruptcy.

Congress writes the laws, passes the reforms, and debates the details. therefore members of Congress like Richard Shelby, David Drier, and Susan Collins not Obama..are at fault.

IMO if it does pass and become law..Boxer, Feinstein, and Pelosi deserve the credit..not Obama! :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. So what part does the president play in getting legislation passed?
I don't want to put words into your mouth, but based on your post it seems like the President is a passive actor and only comes in at the end when the bill is ready to get signed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. exactly..
Edited on Wed Sep-09-09 11:35 AM by flaminbats
The President is a passive actor..signing or vetoing the legislation if Congress has the balls needed to pass it! :shrug:

but Obama is only showing courage and responsibility by addressing Congress..and by framing this debate.

the real responsibility of Obama is to enforce the laws or reforms passed by Congress, or fire those in his administration not willing to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. I think there are the constitutional powers and duties of the executive branch
then there are the duties as the leader of his party and his ability to use the bully pulpit. I would prefer for him to take a more active roll in gaining support of congress, aka arm-twisting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. so would I!!
but I will not blame Obama if members of Congress don't pass a public option. Nor will I vote against members of Congress who supported a public option, but are unable to get the necessary votes to pass the legislation.

I will vote against members of Congress who oppose a public option, who vote against positive reforms..like allowing everyone to buy into benefits available for federal employees, or who vote to cut funding for a public option if it becomes law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
37. The PO does address the ballooning premiums by greedy corps. nt
Edited on Wed Sep-09-09 03:44 PM by quantass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Exactly nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
45. Agreed - making it impossible for me to vote on this poll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why not, at that point, split the bill in half and pass some regulations
of the health care industry, like with pre-existing conditions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Veto the piece of shit and keep sending it back until they get it right.
Because once he signs a shit bill, it's HIS failed policy. And obviously there's no way in hell they could get 67 votes to override a veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. What makes you think they will get a better plan after the veto?
If the bill has enough good in it, Obama would then be blamed for preventing the biggest expansion in government funding of health insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. He said he would be willing to be a "one termer" if that's what it took to pass health care reform
I don't believe that would be the result, if he signed a bill with a REAL, untriggered public option though. Oh sure the Repukes would talk shit about him, but that didn't stop him in 2008, did it?

On the other hand, if he signs a shit bill, he's going to lose the people who elected him. Anything with a corporatist mandate in it, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. That assumes that Congress gives him the bill with the real, untriggered public option
If that happens, of course he will sign it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Which is exactly why he needs to veto anything less than that
and keep doing so until they send up the right bill. They'll never get 67 votes to override him, so really, Obama has the ultimate power here, as to whether actual reform is passed or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. If 12 million people with pre-existing conditions could get covered
by private insurance, would that not be significant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Not if they can't afford it.
:shrug: Ten years ago the most affordable insurance I could get with one pre-existing condition was $320 -- it was simply not doable for me.

Making them take pre-existing conditions or stopping them from dropping people is a nice thought -- but is meanless unless the PRICE is addressed.

And that is where a public option would make or break this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. There has to be a pot of people who would be covered by
employer paid insurance who are being denied by pre-existing conditions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. That assumes that Senators and Congressmen
can be moved. If they could be moved then, they can be moved now. Obama might have the ultimate power of NOT letting "actual" reform pass - he does NOT have the ultimate power to insure a specific bill passes. There is no reason to assume there will be a steady stream of bills until he signs one. In 1993, no bill was ever voted on and sent to the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
14. It does far more harm than good w/o the public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
17. A rare moment of near unanimity in DU Land
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. For better or worse, DU has made the public option the sword they will die on. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. He will sign whatever bill passes
because he will be instrumental in getting the bill through Congress. Why would anyone would think a democratic president would veto a bill of this profile passed by a democratic House and Senate? Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. There's no way he will veto it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. Veto it before the ink is dry.
and then take a shit on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. I wouldn't advise a veto of anything that realistically makes things better for most people
So, I'd accept mediocre but my fail line is there at Mad Max's bill. I think the turd could be polished up to be tolerable but it ain't there now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
25. I support house progressives who promise to vote against a no-public option bill.
Obama should sign the bill that congress presents, but he should be twist more arms before that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. This is the best statement that I've seen on this whole subject.
Thanks for the clearheadedness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
26. K & R - The SILENT "Unreckers" are trying to kick this poll off Greatest Page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
30. VETO
Carry on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
31. He should veto it unless it's got Single Payer instead!!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Yes k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
32. K & R He should veto the hell out of it.
WE THE PEOPLE,
NOT
Them, the corporations!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
33. Veto, Veto, Veto (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
34. Veto unless it regulates the insurance industry out of profitability
But the chances of that are NIL so... public option or bust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
36. He vetos a bill which includes many needed reforms except public option
I oppose that idea and it would defeat his presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
38. He has to please his Corporate Masters
I will eat my shorts were he to actually veto a bill. Thsi past weekend, the banners all around him at the Union meeting were soemthing to the effect of "Health Care Reform NOW!"

Not "Single Payer" Not "Puiblic Option"

Simply "Any ol piece of legislation will do"

So that means he wants to pass something anything NOW!!

And he spent the whole summer asking his opponents what he should do. Equivalent to a quarterback stopping five yards short of the goal post to ask the tackles from the opposing team what to do with the ball.

IT is clear to me - he don't want no stinking real reform. That would hurt his industry buddies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
39. Obama is not going to have to veto anything
If it gets to that point and he is forced to, there will be a damn good reason: something went wrong.

Barring that, the bill that goes to Obama will be one that he can sign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. I see you are still selling Kool-Aid...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Didn't that play out in the primaries? Try a logical and well-reasoned response. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
41. K&R!!
Important stuff...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
43. VETO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
44. VETO n/t
:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC