Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So far today, Robert Gibbs, Valerie Jarrett and Olympia Snowe are talking BIPARTISAN BILL...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:20 PM
Original message
So far today, Robert Gibbs, Valerie Jarrett and Olympia Snowe are talking BIPARTISAN BILL...
Gibbs said that's what the prez wants. (Morning Joe)

Jarrett said that the prez "wants to bring everybody together." (Andrea Mitchell's show)

Snowe (just on msnbc) said that she is against the public option but, based on her recent meeting with him, President Obama is very flexible and she thinks a bipartisan bill is possible and will stand up better.


The next few days should be very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old Studentka Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hoy!
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. I want a bill that passes by one vote, not by 15. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Me too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Any bill that passes by that amount is going to be poor public policy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. The Simulus only had 3 Republican votes - do you consider that bad policy? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Yep- thanks to Republicans and DINO's it was poor legislation that ended up
Edited on Wed Sep-09-09 03:00 PM by depakid
full of ineffective tax cuts -and worse, it slashed federal revenue sharing to the states (which might have been the single STUPIDEST thing that could have been done, except that it also slashed pandemic preparedness funds- IN THE MIDDLE OF A PANDEMIC).

Contrast that with Australia's stimulus legislation that not only kept the nation out of a recession ENTIRELY -but has kept unemployment to 5.6%



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I agree that it would've been much better without the Republicans...
That's why I don't care if we have them this time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Republican Senators ripped up the House bill and wrote the conference bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. So is she willing to accept the public option in a spirit of bipartisanship?
I just want to know what the Republicans are bringing to the bipartisan table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. She asked the prez to "take it off the table" and frowned when...
...she was told that it's not off the table, that he will support it tonight. Hard to tell if she'll go along with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It takes two to Tango
and I'm not seeing any compromise from the bipartisanshits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. True - I'd like to think we can count on Snowe, but who knows. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Shumer might not either... "We Should Still Look Seriously At 50-Vote Bill"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. I want a strong public option. I don't give a crap about a bipartisan bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. So it all hinges on what a repug senator from the low population state of ME wants
Edited on Wed Sep-09-09 02:25 PM by katandmoon
That's democracy all right.

Not that Obama gives a rat's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. In total the gang of 6 represent 3% of the population.
It is really pretty disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Sorry
I have been old enough now to vote against her twice with no success. The media is infatuated with her up here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. One Republican is a pretty ridiculous definition of "bipartisan"
Also Snowe may find herself joining Specter if she dares to be the sole Republican responsible for Obama's most important priority succeeding. The Repukes will see it as high treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm Thinking They Have To Play Out This Bipartisan Issue As Far Down As ......
they can. I believe that they know that they won't get Repugs to vote for anything that they come up with. They just want to show that the Repugs are the ones that are holding any health reform back. Once they've exhausted every ounce of bipartisanship - they will take it through on 'reconciliation' saying that they had no choice and blame the Repugs.

I'm thinking that is the strategy.

Also - I'm thinking that the public option will be laid out tonight to be only for small businesses that don't have membership in any group and are forced to pay high premiums because they are buying only for themselves or a small group of people. It will be sold as a way for small businesses to get a reduction on their premiums. This will be the foothold into a 'public option' program that can be expanded upon at a later date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Could be strategy - it's obviously the message today...
But I do think President Obama really wants a bipartisan bill and will try to get one if possible.

I think it matters much more to him than it does to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
32. I completely agree. If they say bipartisanship is done before they know they can get what they want
then they will get nothing and this entire effort will be for naught. Obama and the admin will continue the bipartisan rhetoric until the very last minute when Obama has all of his pieces in place to make things happen. Until then, they will say what they need to say to continually marginalize the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
36. that's exactly it
and it's clear from the "what ideas do YOU have?" language that the wh has been pushing lately.

this is a SET UP, pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. One Republican does not a "bipartisan" bill make
They'd be lucky to get one and the concessions (including this trigger nonsense) they would have to make to get even one, aren't worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I agree - we got three for the Stimulus and gave up way too much for those votes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fadedrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. I don't recall Olympia Snow running for President..did she win? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Like it or not, she's had the president's ear. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. And I'd love to know why SHE has it, instead of people who, you know, VOTED for him
But Obama has made it crystal clear that we are all as expendable to him as Rev. Wright was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. He seems to want to please his enemies more than his friends...
imo a little therapy is in order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
25. Obama always says he's for a bi-partisan bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. True, and I think he means it too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
29. So we get a crappy bill with minimal Thug input ...
What good is that? Obama and Co. can tout their "bi-
partisan" credentials all they want but if they only
get marginal Thug support, Crypt Kicker McLame will
still scoff at it, Fixed Noize will make hay for days
over it and we end up with NO REFORM. This is turning
into a NO-WIN situation.

Obama needs to put down "Team of Rivals" and pick up
Doris Kearns Goodwin's biography of FDR -- THAT'S the
book he should be focusing on, not all this kumbaya
bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I agree 100% nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
31. Gibbs was on NPR this morning doing his weasel act
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
33. Bipartisan really means getting conservative Democrats on board.
Thats the reality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Blue Dogs do seem to be in a whole other party. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Obama is a borderline blue dog himself; which is why he wants repuke support.
Obama wants the insurance to finance the 2010 and 2012 elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. It does seem like it - especially since he chose Rahm as right-hand man. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Correct...Conservadems and progressives cover a pretty broad spectrum of views
The challenge all along has been our own party. But pretending Obama has a magic wand and 60 banked votes in the Senate is so much more exhilirating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC