Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leaders of Congressional Black Caucus and civil rights groups demand inclusion of public option

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 03:48 PM
Original message
Leaders of Congressional Black Caucus and civil rights groups demand inclusion of public option

But on Capitol Hill, leaders of the Congressional Black Caucus and of nearly a dozen African American civil rights groups gathered to declare their unwavering support Wednesday morning for the inclusion of a public option in health-care reform.

"We are strong on that -- 41 strong," said Rep. Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (D-Mich.).

"We are in a movement, a modern-day civil rights movement," said Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Tex.). "Without a robust public plan, there is no guarantee of change."

Caucus members said they want any reform legislation to preserve measures that would bolster preventive medicine and reduce health disparities.

"As the health-care debate continues to heat up, African American leaders need to be more vocal about why health-care reform is needed in this country," said Marc Morial, president of the National Urban League. "We challenge the lies and distortions and myths that have been utilized to try to defeat health care."

NAACP President Benjamin Jealous said his group is focusing on Blue Dog Democrats, several of whom represent districts in which African Americans make up more than 20 percent of the population. "We are there," he said. "We are watching you, and we expect you to do right. This issue could not be more serious in this recession."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/09/AR2009090901771_4.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hadrons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. They need to stand firm on this ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Trusr me. They will. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Somebody should have listened to them in 2000
We might have had a shot at keeping President Gore.


I'm STILL pissed about that....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good for them!
Keep fighting! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. They will be ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Probably. We all know "black folks ain't got no clout!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. We have none with the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Why do you say that? He's a member of the caucus
I think that is really unfair to basically say Obama doesn't care what they say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. He has taken a hardline stance against progressives at every turn.
The firing of Van Jones is a sign. The fact he hasn't spoken loudly regarding dadt is another of many examples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. He didn't fire Van Jones
Jones quit to keep people out his shit.

And he's in one of the toughest political fights ever on the issue of Healthcare. DADT isn't going to be done at the same time. Its just not. Thats reality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. He didn't fire Van Jones
Jones quit to keep people out his shit.

And he's in one of the toughest political fights ever on the issue of Healthcare. DADT isn't going to be done at the same time. Its just not. Thats reality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC