Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bye-Bye, Single-Payer. HR 676 is now a moot point. Thanks, Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:26 PM
Original message
Bye-Bye, Single-Payer. HR 676 is now a moot point. Thanks, Obama
Thanks a lot.


:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. You radical system changer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yep - just like he never campaigned to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Which is why I liked Kucinich and Edwards over Obama in the Primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DIKB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Kucinich and Weiner are my current faves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. Do you like unicorns, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #27
59. No, I'd like the 20,000 per year
who will STILL die if Obama's weak "Plan" went into effect...

He still retains the evil leeches of the for-profit sick care system completely intact...in fact, more than intact, with tens of millions of new customers PAID OUT OF TAX DOLLARS!

You like killing poor people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
55. Edwards didn't support single-payer, he supported a Public Option.
the only difference between Edwards' plan and Obama's was that Edwards supported a mandate and Obama did not. Now Obama has pretty much adopted the Edwards plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #55
66. Edwards' plan was one that likely would have led to a single-payer option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #66
74. and how did edwards do with the voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
109. and Edwards was never going to give us a single payer system either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Becky72 Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
41. He didn't campaign on a mandate either
And now he's for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
77. He campaigned against mandates.
I guess we only judge him by what he did and did not "campaign for" when it works in his favor?...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Obama just said, in essence, he would not support a single-payer system.
Called it too radical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. He's been saying that every day for a year
Why are you upset or surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. No shit...the whole primary was about this very point
And Obama won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
43. Hillary didn't support single payer either
The primary was about mandated private insurance, which Hillary supported.

Funny that her supporters are now the ones screaming about paying the evil insurance companies. :crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #43
60. Yep, they're all capitalist stooges... (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
48. Just because someone says something in a primary
isn't an excuse to do something stupid. Bush told us in the 2000 campaign he might have to take out Saddam, but so what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
46. Because he's wrong
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
71. You are correct. But don't forget Obama was for the single payer, before he was against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #71
99. do you realize you're recycling a RW kerry smear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. He ran for President for over a yr and never supported
Single Payer while he was running. BEcause there isn't a chance in hell it passes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
70. You are correct my friend.
We were never getting single payer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Like it matters on what he campaigned on? What is RIGHT?
Continuing to fund for-profit healthcare?


Hope you're happy with the insurance lobby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. *yawn*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. uniquely american ftw
I love being a serf, and I wouldn't have it any other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. Uniquely American = Profit over EVERY SINGLE OTHER CONSIDERATION. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #32
61. You nailed it! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Did you think it was going to pass? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It never got a chance
Have you ever read it? It's so simple and effective in how it would work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Get the votes.
Any bill has a chance if you organize a campaign, get the votes and pass it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
58. Then why haven't we been able to pass it in 40 years? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #58
114. Because it hasn't been proposed and voted on since Medicare was passed in 1965
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
57. It never got a chance because it never had the votes. It was sent
to die in committee. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. But of COURSE it was going to pass! And it's only Obama standing in the way.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Every poll showed single-payer with majority national support. Every poll
You're completely out of line to act as if it the people didn't want it.

Where do you get off acting do damn superior, anyway?

You don't do anything more for the party than anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Your poutrage is cute and all, but you had me at "hello".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. You're not entitled to take this derisive tone with people
And it's not about me, it's about the way you act towards everyone who disagrees with you. Stop with the abuse already, no one here deserves it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
44. No. They. Do. Not.
They show people supporting government guaranteeing insurance coverage, which is completely different than supporting single payer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #44
115. That lie gets repeated by single payer activists, ad nauseum. The
Edited on Thu Sep-10-09 10:12 PM by Tarheel_Dem
pity is that this lie has confused the debate to the point where people can't distinguish between single payer & the public option.

P.S.: If someone could produce a reputable poll that shows this overwhelming support for single payer, I'd glady concede that I was wrong all along. I have yet to see such a poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
100. you're evil dude
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. Good thing he's not breaking any promise there.
single payer would be great, but he never ran on that promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. But he could have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cash_thatswhatiwant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. did you expect him to endorse single payer? he never came out in support of single payer (recently).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. He had nothing to lose by saying it was still an option.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. Looks like the Obama fanbois and girls aren't fans of me.
Like I give a shit.

It's a matter of what is the RIGHT thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. You're bitching about something Obama never told you he was supporting
when he was President. Its not about Obama fans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #19
92. if you are going to diss obama supporters, i will remind you that dennis looks like the travelocity
gnome. so there :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
25. What gave you the idea it was seriously being considered - it was never on the table
Edited on Wed Sep-09-09 07:34 PM by stray cat
we will be lucky to pass a public option. I'm sure it will fare better under the GOP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #25
40. well, the GOP is essentially
dictating the terms of this so called health care reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. HR 676 had fewer co-sponsors in this Congress...
...than in the last Congress. And legislation, last I looked, had to pass Congress?

Where are the votes going to come from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Even Bernie said there are about 10 votes in the Senate for it
Edited on Wed Sep-09-09 07:36 PM by Thrill
You can't get Single Payer unless you do Campaign Finance Reform first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Obama could do it....
....all by himself, he just has to want to, really, really bad, and it would happen.

The Green Lantern Theory of politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
67. Unfortunately. Campaign Finance Reform will itself soon be an extinct species
When the Supreme Court decrees it so. Including Opie Roberts and Sammy the Fish Alito, whom most of the DLC traitors and Blue Balled Cowards in the Senate voted to confirm, by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
51. And the vote against the war
had few sponsors.

I guess we should just give up and surrender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #51
90. Make a list of three practical steps...
...that actually gets an HR 676 onto the floor with a chance of passage should be taken?

Which one logically has to get done first?

Go do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
34. Nice that you are rolling your eyes at yourself. So I don't have to roll mine. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
35. Was glad it got cheers
The President had to take note at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
36. Almost any meaningful reform is now a moot point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. it was from the onset n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #36
52. It really is moot
Start at $6700 a year healthcare cost per person, and plan to pay more. Thre's no radical vision or change here. It's more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
37. Not one dime to the deficit for health reform. How about not one dime for the deficit for
Edited on Wed Sep-09-09 07:48 PM by avaistheone1
the MidEast wars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
38. Single payer was always a non-starter. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
39. Show Me The Votes for Single Payer
Have you ever taken a civics class in your life? If you have, then tell me how Obama can get the votes in the Congress for a single payer system. Those votes are not there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #39
53. I would like to see the votes as well
Look how hard it is just to get a public option through Congress, I'm not sure how the OP thinks single payer has the votes.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #53
65. *cough*insurance lobby*cough*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #39
56. Exactly. Everytime it was proposed it died in committee. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
62. They would be if the USAmerican people
actually knew shit about single-payer...

and about what the Civilized world has already done...

The votes would be there if the truth were allowed to be told.

But, as others have said, the business of the USAmerikan Empire is profit...no matter who it kills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #39
96. i think some people actually think he can some how declare it so.
it's the only reason i can think of why they blame obama when it has only a tiny number of people supporting it in the congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
45. A TRUE "Public Option" was the compromise. Tonight, he calls for PO but redefines it
He parses words with the best of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
47. Looks like we're gonna start out
with $6700 a year healthcare, and go up from there, with a mandatory insurance plan. It's Romneycare. Just as I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
49. Where and when did he promise that?
It may be what you (and I) want, but that was never even put out there from his camp. It was never a point to begin with in his playbook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
50. Funny how he starts out the speech saying we are the only democracy in the
world that doesn't cover everyone AND THEN throws single payer under the bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #50
69. + 1000 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #50
95. so, even though there is virtually nil support in congress, it's obama's fault, right?
there is no where near enough support for it, and obama doesn't have dictatorial powers to install it by fiat, so what do you want from him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
54. Face it, it NEVER had a chance. And blaming it on Obama
is just childish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
63. I hope you get a chance to take a civics class before you die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. I hope you get a chance to wipe that smugness off your face before you die
Geez...Obama fan club is awfully pissy up here tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. Dumb is as dumb does. Obviously you can't support this president
without being called a "fan", and on a democratic site no less. Perhaps you should start your own site where no support for this DEMOCRATIC president is allowed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #68
103. I completely agree with you...
and, as you can probably see by my avatar, President Obama was not my FIRST choice.

As I watched the speech last night, though, I found myself thinking how proud I am that he is our president. His pragmatism is admirable. He is well aware of the need for change, but also aware that the change will not be an overnight occurrence. It takes TIME.

As much as i am happy that Congressman Kucinich is around, he will NEVER be the president, and if we don't want to see Mitt, or his ilk in the White House in 2012, we will stop whining that President Obama is not moving further to the left than he was during the campaign. The vast majority of American people are not there either.

I have, so far, been mostly happy with this administration. There have been a few disappointments, but many more agreements.

If people on a site called Democratic Underground can't be a "fan" of the Democratic president without being put down for it, then I think something is seriously wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #103
113. Thank you for your respectful response, and I completely agree with you.
The downside of the constant carping from the left is that it will only weaken this president to the point where the left won't get any of the things they're bitching about. My fear is that if healthcare fails, it will damage him for the next fight, which will surely be energy legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #64
78. Obama fan club my ass
You're just being a pissy jerk. You're the one who attacked someone (the President), don't get all bent out of shape when people call you on your silliness (nobody on the planet ever thought single payer had a snowball's chance in hell of passing.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #78
79. Nobody on the planet, eh? Well, go on and enjoy having your for-profit healthcare
Go on and enjoy your insurance lobbyists controlling policy.

Hope you're happy...moran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stklurker Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #79
89. they are right
No, they are right.. there is not support for single payer at this time. This will have to be incremental change.. You dont just climb Mt.Everest in a day, you have to work your way from base camp to base camp before you take the summit.. it takes weeks. Same principal applies here, you arent going to just get single payer, you are going to have work your way to it. Fight for the public option as base camp 1, go from there. The president is being smart, if you go "all in" right now, you dont have the cards and the other players at the table know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #89
98. well stated.
Edited on Thu Sep-10-09 09:41 AM by dionysus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #89
110. Yes, that's the logical answer
The O/P is being one of those "all or nothing" reactionaries. I'm not sure why people do this as it's annoying and non-productive.

Anyway, welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stklurker Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #110
111. thanks
Thanks... actually been here for years.. just dont post much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #64
97. you can do better than that, throw out a cult or messiah, hell start printing your kucinich 12 signs
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
72. It is hard to imagine anyone in history that could get single payer passed with what
there is to work with.

The right thing isn't always within in the realm of possibility. I've seen thousands of posts on this but still no indication of where even a base of votes to work off of come from. The votes would have to be manufactured in the House but it is within imagination, if not reality, but in the Senate we're lucky if double digit votes exist to start from.

This shit doesn't happen by magic. It is reasonable to lament that what is best for the country is out of reach and to figure out how to get there but it is way irrational to be upset with Obama or anyone else that might hold the office for not pulling single payer out of his ass. There is no advanced legwork on this policy at all and it is close to cracked out to think with any context of American politics whatsoever to think something of that scope to happen overnight. Conditioning the public and getting the votes is likely a 15-20 year haul without some massive and sudden meltdown.

It's kinda screwy to mad when the base and the POSSIBLES come to about 35. No one is going to go to the mat just to wrangle a possible win in the house and with lots of luck and armtwisting maybe a 1/3 of the Senate. Honestly, until the oldest generation fades out I don't think you can get a clear majority of voters solidly on board. The underestimation of residual "red scare", American Exceptionalism, and the weird vicarious greed that infects the country is a fatal miscalculation that leads to a lot of hurt feelings and disappointment on this issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
73. When this current health care passes, we'll have single-payer in about 12 to 15 years.
When Social Security first passed in 1935, only half the people in the country were eligible. It was pretty much limited to white males.

That was with a much more Progressive Congress than what President Obama has now.

It took about 12 years after that to fully cover everyone left out in the initial passage.

So, should FDR and Congress not even have passed it because it was initially limited and not as far-reaching?

Or was it better to get what was passable at the time and work steadily over a decade or so to get the missing pieces gradually added?

This is how health care reform will be done. Get what is passable now, and work over the next decade to gradually move it left until we achieve that single-payer, universal coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
75. Just a reminder that Obama is not a monarch and that Single Payer will have to be incremental
Take a class on how legislation gets passed. It's messy. And it takes a lot of voices to make it work.

I'm for HR 676 too, but have known for years that Single Payer is not going to just happen eight months into the Obama administration after not really getting anywhere near this close for 60+ years.

Instead of whining, do something to help get your local representatives to pass the Public Option. That's what the grownups are doing.

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #75
101. Zulch
You still rock!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
76. Oh, shut up,
How stupid can you be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
80. It can't pass. GET THE HELL BEHIND YOUR PRESIDENT !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #80
83. I will when he supports a Robust Public Option. Before then: NO BILL! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
81. Correction
it was always a moot point. Nothing about the speech changed this. Your perception of the facts has changed, the facts however remain the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
82. When was it ever going to be an option?
I am more bothered by the continuous calls to bipartisanship. We need a bill, not an attempt to cuddle GOPers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #82
84. A bill that MANDATES insurance is not relief. Better to have NO BILL. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #84
86. He campaigned against the mandates. Now we have mandates. That is change
:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #84
87. Goody. I assume you have a good insurance, because these are generally those who do who think
Edited on Thu Sep-10-09 07:08 AM by Mass
we can wait.

I dislike mandates, but we will have mandates. The only questions is whether these mandates will only apply to private insurances, or if there will be a public plan. May be we should spend some time making sure there is a public plan, rather than stating ultimatum that will not happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
85. It's only dead if you give up the fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
88. It was always a moot point. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
91. oh noes!11!!11!!11!! did you forget that dennis isn't president, and obama didn't run on single
Edited on Thu Sep-10-09 09:27 AM by dionysus
payer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
93. For something not as widely discussed or supported no surprise. Best outcome is Kucinch's state
opportunity to build upon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
94. I just want some structure to cover the uninsured. Put the structure in there
and you can come back again and change it and expand it.
Medicare and social security were not what they are today when first passed.
Single payer would be great if there was public support and votes in Congress for it. But being a pragmatic realist, I get that there is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
102. You know when the LSD wears off? and the sphinx turns out to just be your cat?
I hate that too.

Reality bites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
104. Go cry somewhere else.
Single payer was never even on the table, regardless how much the delusional like to claim it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
105. Translation: Even though Obama campaigned AGAINST single-payer.... I, Roland99, believed that...
...he was secretly for it.


Because I'm a doofus who disregarded what Obama told me since February of 2007, and wanted to believe he was lying for a year and a half before now.



He got elected running on a platform that did NOT have single-payer health insurance.


Pay attention in class next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
106. When was HR 676 ever not moot?
Sorry, but this bill never had any chance of going anywhere, before or after Obama's speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
107. Write Congress. Until they change their minds,
there is nothing Obama can do (besides veto, which would mean that NO changes take effect). Sorry, I'll settle for some key changes over none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
108. You never were going to get a single payer and Obama nor any other serious presidential candidate
Edited on Thu Sep-10-09 12:23 PM by WI_DEM
including Hillary ever promised it. If we are having such a hard time with a public option do you think the votes are there for a single payer? If you think it's so easy to get the single payer system get elected to office and then you can magically get it passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dr_b Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
112. Ok, it's over then. Let's focus on what can be passed that will make a positive change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
116. And, today, insurance company stocks rose healthily. yay for subsidizing them!
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC