Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Public Option IS the most important part of a health care bill and here is why....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 07:02 PM
Original message
The Public Option IS the most important part of a health care bill and here is why....
Say you pass a bill that includes everything except a Public Option.

The Insurance Companys would be forced to cover everyone but they can still price fix and jack the rates as much as they please.
Thom Harman has said that there are no laws to prevent collusion on prices as insurance companys are not subject to federal anti-trust laws(McCarran-Ferguson Act). So yes they would have to offer everyone insurance but at rates that would still bankrupt most.

Now if you pass a bill that has nothing but a strong Public Option that covers everyone and everything and is run at a small profit it would force the insurance companys to do the same if they want to stay in business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. When I asked the British DUers about the NHS versus private
they said that the fact that the presence of the NHS reduces the prices of both private insurance and private medical care. Both the insurance companies and the doctors in private practice know that their patients can always avail themselves of the NHS, so they're careful not to price themselves out of business.

I mean, look at what happens here. What is the point of raising the rates of someone like me 13% per year, someone who has used maybe $800 worth of medical care in the past six years, who has NEVER met her deductible--not when it was $1000, not now when it's $5000?

The insurance company is making money off me like crazy, and they keep raising my rates because THEY CAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oy. There will be SUBSIDIES
and those subsidies will apply to both the public option and private insurance because there isn't any way in the world that a public option will be affordable to low income waitresses and 7-11 workers either.

If the subsidies get so high that they start to break the back of the taxpayer, then costs will have to come down or we will have to go to a full single payer option.

I can't figure out why anybody believes a public option is going to be the affordable option to low income people. That isn't what is being proposed at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If premiums keep going up, then this subject will be re-visited, but...
Edited on Thu Sep-10-09 07:32 PM by Eric J in MN
...the solution Congress passes won't necessarily be single-payer.

Instead, Congress may try to solve that problem by overriding all state insurance regulations.

But if there is already a public option which is widely viewed as successful, then expanding it may be the solution passed by Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. To that point......I wonder what the real costs of health care are? How big are the profit....
margins in the current system?

I suspect a public option would force insurance company's to become leaner and operate at a 10 to 15 percent margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. A1 10% they'd be 3x *more* inefficient than now. Broken down here...
Edited on Thu Sep-10-09 07:36 PM by Davis_X_Machina
The insurance industry is not a particularly profitable industry. To be more specific, they're the 86th most profitable industry as measured by profit margins, with an average margin of 3.3 percent. That's lower than drug manufacturers (16.5 percent), health information services (9.3 percent), home health care (8.4 percent), medical labs and research (8.2 percent), medical instruments and supplies (6.8 percent), biotech firms (6.7 percent), generic drug manufacturers (6.6 percent), and much else. That's not to pretend that 3.3 percent is nothing, but it's hard to see how that's a primary driver of health-care spending, much less the growth in health-care spending.


From here, quoted here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. What about capping the premiums and total cost?
Wouldn't that do the trick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. There are regulations in that direction
They will not be able to charge more than twice the amount based on age, they can't charge based on illness, and they have to distribute a specified percentage of premiums. Those regulations will go a long way to controlling premiums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Their stock will tank before then, Wall Street knows that rescission and preconditions outlawed ....
...there's no way the margins of the HCI's will stay where they're at now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yup. No public option means a huge windwall for big insurance and entrapped Americans. (nt)
Edited on Thu Sep-10-09 08:11 PM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ys, and we're not going to get one
screwn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC