Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Glenn Beck wants it to be 9/12/2001 again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 12:08 PM
Original message
Glenn Beck wants it to be 9/12/2001 again
I am assuming that that will also include unconditional support for our Commander in Chief as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kakaze42 Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. 9/12/ 2001
That type of unity will not come easily again.

Too many people want to surrender, some do not understand and others really want this Republic to be changed into a farce.

It's just the times we live in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We can get there, by standing with the president
when you second guess President Obama, our Commander in Chief, then Al Qaeda wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kakaze42 Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. makes no sense
People questioned bush, I did, I will question obama too, I think he is wrong.

It is possible I could be wrong, but I will remain engauged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Engauged?
The Freudian aspects of that typo are interesting coming from a teabag defender.

Don't you guys have dictionaries or spell check?

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. You think Obama is wrong about what?
By the way. Proper nouns are capitalized. Engauged is not a word in the English language. And it's possible you are wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. 9/12/2001 again? That means * would be President and Cheney would be VP.
I think I will pass on that, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC