Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's speech had some important news: plan now includes some immediate relief on insurance costs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 04:11 PM
Original message
Obama's speech had some important news: plan now includes some immediate relief on insurance costs
Edited on Fri Sep-11-09 04:11 PM by babylonsister
http://prospect.org/cs/articles?article=health_care_reform_gets_a_booster_shot

Health Care Reform Gets a Booster Shot

Obama's speech had some important news: his plan now includes some immediate relief on insurance costs.


Paul Starr | September 11, 2009 | web only


President Obama's speech to Congress on health care Wednesday evening succeeded at several levels. Beforehand, observers said that he needed to explain to a confused public what he is proposing and why it makes sense, and the speech did that. Analysts also said that the president needed to shift the momentum from August, to confront the ugly distortions of the opposition, and to mobilize support in his own party. In those respects as well, the speech did all that might have been expected of it.

But Obama also undertook several things that were unexpected -- at least, I didn't expect him to do them. He introduced an important new element into the policy discussion. He signaled his support for what is now the likely resolution of the most contentious issue--the public option. And after paying respect to Republicans for their ideas, he used the coda of his speech to make the larger case for liberalism more eloquently than any president has in decades.

The new element in the policy discussion has to do with a little-discussed but serious political vulnerability of the proposals being considered in Congress--the timetable of reform. Under the current proposals, most of the uninsured wouldn't get coverage until the new insurance exchanges are set up in 2013. The law would move more quickly in improving prescription-drug coverage for the elderly and curbing some of the worst insurance abuses. But before the non-elderly would see results firsthand from the new system for buying, subsidizing, and regulating insurance, Republicans would have two elections to arouse public anxiety and overturn reform.

Obama said that it would indeed take four years to set up the exchanges in order to "do it right." But then he added, "In the meantime, for those Americans who can't get insurance today because they have pre-existing medical conditions, we will immediately offer low-cost coverage that will protect you against financial ruin if you become seriously ill."

Making catastrophic health insurance "immediately" available would provide a bridge to more substantial reforms in 2013. Some may worry about the measure's potential effects. Given the overall budgetary expenditure that Obama endorsed ($900 billion over 10 years), will the cost of short-term catastrophic coverage force Congress to adopt lower subsidies for the more comprehensive coverage beginning in 2013? And because temporary programs often have a way of becoming permanent, might catastrophic insurance become entrenched by 2013 as the level supported by the federal government?


snip//

As he finished, Obama seemed to strike the posture of a general leading his troops into battle. He would hear nothing of those who counsel retreat. Shrinking from the fight, he said, was not what he and others came to Washington to do. "We did not come to fear the future. We came here to shape it." He appealed not just to our sense of justice but to a liberal vision of our national character. There have been elements of this appeal in his earlier speeches, but they were pitch perfect Wednesday night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. NAW....NAW.....NAW...Gotta wait four years!!! /badSarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. The REAL reason refrom delayed for four years...
...It will take effect AFTER the 2012 election.

They are corrupt, not dumb.
They KNOW that the 75% of Americans expecting REAL reform are going to be "disappointed" when they open their new Health Care Package and find a BIG bill from the For Profit Health Insurance Industry....
AND, they will be a criminal if they don't pay it.

YES. Great idea to delay this until AFTER the next election.
Who in their right mind really believes that it would take 4 YEARS to set this up?

FDR got Medicare up and running in less than 1 year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC