Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Van Jones Affair: An “Unfriendly Environment” for Progressives at the White House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 11:18 PM
Original message
The Van Jones Affair: An “Unfriendly Environment” for Progressives at the White House
Edited on Sat Sep-12-09 11:22 PM by Better Believe It


The Van Jones Affair: An “Unfriendly Environment” for Progressives at the White House
by Black Agenda Report executive editor Glen Ford


The firing of White House “green-jobs” point-person Van Jones is the latest manifestation of the Obama Administration’s abiding fear of the Right and distaste for progressives – although it is unclear which is the more powerful reflex. This weekend’s dismissal of the veteran activist, author and powerful motivational speaker turned administration functionary cannot but send a chill through the ranks of those who style themselves “progressives for Obama,” in and out of government, who believed they had found a political “home” under the Obama umbrella.

It would be wrong to conclude that Jones was “hounded” out of the White House by Fox News telereactionary Glenn Beck’s charges that the 40 year-old Yale-educated lawyer was a supporter of Mumia Abu Jamal, had signed a letter questioning the Bush Administration’s version of 9/11, and once referred to Republicans as “assholes” (quickly adding that he, Jones, “can be an asshole,” too.) This is pretty tame stuff, considering that the feigned outrage emanates from a crowd that routinely refers to the president as a socialist, an Arab and a non-citizen – epithets of the worst kind in Beck-Limbaughland. Besides, this is an administration whose Treasury Secretary neglected to pay taxes and whose top economic advisors, Larry Summers and Robert Rubin, were key players in setting the stage for the current economic disaster. Walking catastrophes like these men are thought by the administration to need no defense, yet the rising young Black star is cast out of the firmament.

Glenn Beck’s and the GOP’s regurgitated McCarthyism – of which Obama, himself, is the main target – is as transparent as it is vicious. But remember that Sen. Joseph McCarthy, the 1950s Red-hunter, could not personally fire anyone outside his own staff. Neither could the many freelance witch-hunting vigilante outfits of the era. McCarthyism’s many thousands of victims were laid low by employers and college deans and such who acted on the diabolical politician’s charges. Glenn Beck didn’t fire Van Jones, Obama did.

Or, to be more technically correct, the president and Jones’ boss, Nancy Sutley, chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality, accepted his resignation. Although often referred to as the White House “green-jobs czar,” Jones was officially a Special Advisor for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, one of nearly thirty special advisors in various disciplines scattered about the White House, most of whom are not required to be confirmed by Congress. Obama’s spin doctors encouraged the media to call these advisors “czars,” doubtless because some, like Jones, represented otherwise under-served political constituencies that the president wanted to feel empowered. Jones described himself as “the green jobs handyman,” and said “there’s no such thing as a green-jobs czar.”

Jones is anything but a hack, nor would he consent to be mere widow dressing. In making his now-infamous “Republicans are assholes” remark, Jones declared that “some of us who are not Barack Hussein Obama are going to have to start getting a little bit uppity." The uppity Jones got slapped down by his own president, who behaves as if progressives are his primary problem in forging a grand, “nonpartisan” consensus. Progressives were made unwelcome at White House forums on health reform, lest they spoil Obama’s courtship of Republicans and the drug and insurance companies they serve. Now Jones has been unceremoniously discarded so that Obama might reconcile with modern-day McCarthyites. It is not unreasonable to describe Obama’s White House as an unfriendly environment for progressives, and getting worse.


A shining progressive star of the Obama administration was unceremoniously dismissed to satisfy the McCarthyites of the GOP. But it must be noted that “Glenn Beck didn’t fire Van Jones, Obama did.” Jones' “talents are best put to use outside of this 'progressive-unfriendly' administration."


Please read the complete article at:

http://www.blackagendareport.com/?q=content/van-jones-affair-%E2%80%9Cunfriendly-environment%E2%80%9D-progressives-white-house



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. .
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Glen Ford drunk on Grampa's Old Country Haterade again, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's just plain wrong to call right-wingers assholes, even if they are!

Oh I'm so sorry for offending you. I used a bad word to describe right-wing racists .... ass-holes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The asshole comment was not his undoing it was the truther petition
there is no way to defend that without look like the WH supports some nutty conspiracy theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Exactly, and when the next GOP President hirers a birther.....
Edited on Sat Sep-12-09 11:59 PM by Clio the Leo
..... we'll get him fired even faster.

Even if we give Jones the benefit of the doubt that he didn't fully read the petition .... there was simply no way someone who's on video describing the opposition using inflammatory language (true as it might have been) was gonna continue to have a job at the Obama White House. Anyone who can't understand that fails to understand the man they helped to elect.

There was no outside pressure ... if Barack "No Drama" Obama still wanted him there, he'd be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. How will you get them fired? By calling them a birther? No, that will get them a promotion!

But President Obama can't defend someone who called the right-wingnut Republicans assholes?

The attacks will continue and deepen with that surrender to the right-wing. They have been encouraged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. How is that defendable?
At the most, the remark lacked common sense, (why say it at a public forum where you can be recorded?) at the least it lacked home training.

If LaDainian Tomlinson fumbles the ball enough times Monday night, he'll get put on the bench too. The stakes are TOO high and everyone in the administration has to be on point. The President has enough to worry about without petty BS getting in the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. You're joking about this part right?
Exactly, and when the next GOP President hirers a birther.....

..... we'll get him fired even faster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. if you have to ask..... NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Touche
or is it Toucan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
28. I think a lot of us are beginning to understand the man we
helped to elect.

He's a weak kneed compromiser who hasn't got the balls to stand up for his own when attacked by the right wing.

And it's increasingly clear that Mr. Ford is right when it comes to this administrations true feelings regarding progressive Democrats. So maybe the "his own" part of my previous sentence is incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Or you could let him explain and clarify his action just like Republicans in the White House
constantly did.

And the President isn't expected to agree with what everyone on the White House staff has done or said their entire lives.

Father Coughlin and other right-wing nuts constantly attacked FDR and the "communists" in his administration and things they said or did. FDR didn't fire them or ask any of them resign. Once you let them get their foot in the door and cave-in to them they just won't let go. Get they encouraged and find others to attack.

Where do you draw the line?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. No amount of clarification is going undo the truther petition
if was just the asshole comment you'd have a point. You say this will only encourage them, but to me this simply fighting for the sake of fighting. That we should dig our heels in and be forced to defend the guy just so we can give the finger to Glenn Beck and his minions doesn't seems like a smart strategy to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. So don't worry about them. Screw them! When they say "jump" will you jump?

"Forced" to defend the guy from Glenn Beck and other racists?

It should be automatic!

Well, I sure don't want you watching my back. At the first sign of trouble you'll run!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
24. Another luminary who signed that petition:
8. Philip J. Berg, Esquire, former deputy attorney general, Pennsylvania

Berg is the founder of the Birther Movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Show me where he asked for more than a more
thorough investigation. We should ALL be screaming for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. An investigation into LIHOP is not reasonable.
No LIHOPer is fit for service in the Obama admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #16
31. The whitewash of what happened leading up to that attack
and the cover-up of what happened afterward may be fine to you, but as an AMERICAN, I demand a more thorough investigation. Some others dont seem to care that there was a cover-up. If that shoe fits you fine, wear it proudly. It pains me, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Did you see the petition he signed? There wasn't anything on it that was at all
unreasonable unless questions like why didn't the FAA follow its procedures for a hijacked plane are now considered unreasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Accusing the Bush admin of LIHOP makes you nutjob.
And those who want an investigation into whether the US government knew about the plot to destroy the WTC and let it happen anyways are the same as the "why won't he release his long form" nutjobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. That's not what the petition said and he has every right like anyone else
to ask for a proper more thorough investigation. That 9/11 commission was an ass covering farce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. The Statement
On August 31, 2004, Zogby International, the official North American political polling agency for Reuters, released a poll that found nearly half (49.3%) of New York City residents and 41% of those in New York state believe US leaders had foreknowledge of impending 9/11 attacks and "consciously failed" to act. Of the New York City residents, 66% called for a new probe of unanswered questions by Congress or the New York Attorney General.

In connection with this news, we have assembled 100 notable Americans and 40 family members of those who died to sign this 9/11 Statement, which calls for immediate public attention to unanswered questions that suggest that people within the current administration may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war.


http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. It was the Truther stuff that did him in, and everyone knows it.
Anyhow, your agenda isn't to uphold Van Jones's honor, but to continue your trolling attacks on Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. I don't want you watching the back of any progressive in the Obama administration because ...
Edited on Sun Sep-13-09 09:07 AM by Better Believe It
At the first sign of trouble you'll run away!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
18. “Unfriendly Environment” for Progressives at the White House ?
You could say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
19. Until I hear from Van Jones himself saying that, I say Bullshit!
This article is from the Black Agenda, which has an agenda, and its interest ain't about this Administration succeeding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. .
:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. Yes FrenchieCat, it's true that the Black Agenda Report has an agenda.
Edited on Sun Sep-13-09 02:20 PM by Better Believe It
And it's not a secret!

Their agenda is very clear.

Their agenda is advancing the interests and needs of African-Americans and not subordinating those interests to the political objectives of the Obama administration when they are in conflict.

Do you understand that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. If thats the case, why
aren't they writing about all the racial abuse the President is receiving from the right
wing, why?

Instead they are writing divisive article after the other just to help diminish the
reputation of the President.

Riddle me this....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
25. Ford still trying spin his envy into reality. There is no "unfriendly environment" for progressives
Patrick Gaspard
Melody Barnes
Ron Bloom

Fortunately, Obama is making the decisions, not Ford, which is the thing that is really burning him up.

Ford is a fucking asshole who has been writing idiotic crap about Obama for years:

Obama Insults Half A Race

By Glen Ford

21 June, 2008
Black Agenda Report

The Democratic presidential nominee-apparent seldom speaks directly to Black people, but when he does it is usually to denounce individuals once close to him or to criticize The Race in general for some moral failing. Thus it was no surprise that Barack Obama used the occasion of Father's Day to give Black males the back of his hand, no doubt to the delight of millions of potential white supporters. Black males have "abandoned their responsibilities, acting like boys instead of men," said Obama, citing statistics on female-headed households. "You and I know how true this is in the African-American community."

Even the New York Times could see through Obama's transparent bid for white approval at Black people's expense. Reporter Julie Bosman noted that Obama "laid out his case in stark terms that would be difficult for a white candidate to make" - terms (such as boy?) that "his campaign hopes (will) resonate among white social conservatives in a race where these voters may be up for grabs."

In effect, Obama is following an established American electoral tradition of running against Black people. He claims to be teaming up with Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh to promote legislation to combat a "national epidemic of absentee fathers." However, Obama's church rant was anything but "race-neutral" - it was targeted directly at Black males. By selecting the politically conservative (in Black terms) Apostolic Church of God as the venue for his blanket Black male denunciation, Obama also reminded whites that he is no longer a member of Trinity United Church of Christ, formerly pastored by Rev. Jeremiah Wright, also located on Chicago's South Side.

To make himself acceptable to whites, Obama finds it necessary to shout out how unacceptable he finds the conduct of other Blacks. As could have been expected, corporate headline editors had a field day: "Obama Tells Black Fathers to Act Like Men" (AFP), "Obama Calls on Black Men to Be Better Fathers" (U.S. News & World Report), "Black Fathers Missing From Too Many Lives" (The Age), "Obama Calls for More Responsibility From Black Fathers" (NYT). Words like these are music to the ears of those who blame African American "pathology" for the ills of the ghetto and the nation as a whole, especially the "Reagan Democrats" Obama so shamelessly woos.

<...>


Everything he writes is spun from envy.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
29. kick for later
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
30. Glen Ford hates Obama. And has ever since his Senate Campaign
Nothing he says is credible as it relates to Obama in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
34. lol Black agenda report. Almost as unbiased and accurate as the WSWS.
Almost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC