Somebody else who is more concerned about some vague issues than about every single American having access to healthcare.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_09/019923.phpFEINSTEIN'S CONCERNS OVER 'ANGST'.... Even now, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D) of California is not only skeptical about the specifics of health care reform, she's concerned about the very idea of improving the system. (thanks to reader M.R.)
"I just find that if you're going to remake a sixth of the American economy, it's very difficult at this time of great economic angst," Feinstein said in an interview with The Chronicle. <...>
Like her red-state colleagues, Feinstein also worried about creating new automatic spending programs -- known as entitlements -- that would compound an already serious fiscal situation.
"There is real concern over debt and deficits, and whether this bill will create additional entitlements," Feinstein said. "That's important to me and I think it's important to them."
...
Her concerns, however, are far from compelling. Obama's proposal, while critically important, does not constitute a "wholesale overhaul" of the nation's health care system. While there may be widespread "economic angst" in the midst of the recession, the measures under consideration won't take effect until 2013, when the recession will be behind us and the "angst" will be less pronounced. And with reform poised to help the economy, the argument doesn't exactly make sense anyway.
As for Feinstein not wanting to create another "entitlement," this is a strikingly conservative way to look at the policy debate. Either Americans should have access to quality, affordable health care or not. President Obama told Congress last week, "In the United States of America, no one should go broke because they get sick." Either Feinstein agrees or she doesn't.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
