Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry on Baucus' bill: "it’s not going to be the bill that we’re going to vote"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 09:25 PM
Original message
Kerry on Baucus' bill: "it’s not going to be the bill that we’re going to vote"

Dems ready to amend Baucus health bill

By Jeffrey Young

<...>

Baucus should expect to see many amendments from Democratic members of the committee, said Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.).

“There will undoubtedly be amendments in the committee process – and probably a lot of them,” Kerry said. “There’ll be some big fights over different components of this.”

Asked whether he could vote in favor of Baucus’s draft proposal that senators discussed in their meeting Monday evening, Kerry said: “I’m glad I don’t have to answer that because I know it’s not going to be the bill that we’re going to vote on because we are going to amend, we are going to have a tug-of-war still.”

Nevertheless, Kerry sounded an upbeat note about the prospects of healthcare reform passing the Senate. “Not everybody is going to like every aspect of it in the Senate but in the end I believe we will get something that addresses the needs and concerns of the American people.”

<...>

In addition to concerns about the subsidies and other issues, liberals are also upset that Baucus decided to omit a government-run public option insurance program from his bill, instead opting to embrace a proposal by Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) to create not-for-profit healthcare cooperatives that would compete with private insurers. Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) has been especially skeptical of this attempt to compromise with Republicans and centrist Democrats who oppose the public option.

more

Baucus doesn't even have support from Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. baucus the insurance corp tool isn't too sharp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I love that graphic - wish someone with cash would fund people to follow them around DC with these
posters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That would be ideal, alright!
It's not as if they have any reason for denying Public Option to Americans except to answer to their insurance corp masters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I wish that graphic showed how much money they've taken from insurance
and the names of each insurance company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. They shouldn't even bother amending Baucus bill. They should table it permanently
and bring up Kennedy's HELP bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Don't they need the finacing part of it - or can they just spin those pieces off
and add them to the HELP bill as an amendment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. Indeed, they do need the financing part n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. They cant. They need to get the bill out of committee in order to get a final bill ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. This should be interesting
Almost all of the Republicans are totally against even Baucus' plan, so he needs Democrats to vote it out. The real question will be who blinks first - all the Democrats likely want some bill out, because that is needed to get to the next step of combing it with the HELP bill. But, if the majority of Democrats on the committee dislike the bill - could Baucus be the one forced to change to please Kerry, Rockefeller et al? I hope that meeting is open, but something tells me Baucus likely wants this - like his committee - behind closed doors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. The markup cannot
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 07:03 AM by Inuca
happen behind closed doors, can it? I watched some of the markup in the HELP committee, very interesting. Also, Rockefeller has been surprisingly good and vocal about all this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. I posted the amendment (which is really a replacement bill) that he will speak about
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 07:46 AM by karynnj
and his Senate floor comments on it down thread. I have read just the comments, not the bill which I included because it was there immediately following in the record. In case others wanted to see details I included it.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=8653971&mesg_id=8654388

There were comments that the left out liberals on the Finance committee had been having their own meetings at the time that Baucus excluded them - the names I remember were Rockefeller, Kerry and Menendez. (I don't think they were the whole list - I remember them clearly as Menendez is my Senator and Kerry is ... Kerry. )

(It is interesting that other than Bingaman, Baucus took REPUBLICANS from the heath subcommittee, but excluded ALL the Democrats including the chair, Rockefeller. Not to mention, it is Conrad and himself - not on that subcommittee - who have clearly been dominant.) Here's the subcommittee - http://finance.senate.gov/sitepages/subcommittees.htm

(Looking at the list there are some pretty powerful Senators excluded - Kerry, Rockefeller are very senior and chair important committees (not to mention Kerry was the 2004 nominee) and Schumer is in the leadership. It will be interesting to see what this committee's members will do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Thanks! I saw your other post
later. This also answers my question below about how the Rockefeller bill relates to the others.

Very interesting about the liberals in the committee meeting on their own, first time I heard of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. I'm not sure.
The Finance committee is less good about having links to view all of their hearings - though I can't imagine this won't be one that people want to cover. It is interesting that Kerry/Rockefeller are signaling their will be a fight for changes and Baucus is claiming that the bill out of committee will not have major changes. (I hope Baucus is as incapable of predicting Democratic actions on this as he was in predicting the Republican ones. If he has NO Republican on board with what he has (or even just Snowe), it will be interesting to see if this excluded group bands together. I would imagine that in addition to the unpopularity of his bill (it does unite Democrats and Republicans in disliking the plan part) and the frustration and anger they may feel being members of the committee of interest and being completely and publicly excluded might fuel a mutiny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. I just can't believe that
CSPAN will not cover this. They covered the Dodd and Waxman markups extensively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kerry is a class act... and he just lost someone close. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. And yet the media acts like the Baucus bill will be the final one. They have no clue about how bills
are made in Congress. They need to go back and take Social Studies classes in 7th and 8th grade again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I've been amazed at how blatantly CNN has skewed its coverage
of this bill. It also amazes me that they are spending so much time on the "backlash" to Obama and speaking as though he suddenly had Bush's 2008 approval ratings. I distinctly remember people disliked and protested Bush - yet I really don't remember this type of coverage - which I would have quite enjoyed then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. And sadly, the same can be said of some people here.
Which would have been shocking when I joined in '03, but is now as common as a backyard skunk on a late summer night.

Thank God there are still some people here who get this, anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Baucus's bill was supposed to be the main one. He promised bipartisanship
But surprise surprise! he won't get a single Republican vote. Such a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Baucus is not fool! He knows damn well that the Repukes have no intention of voting for his bill.
He's just trying to get *anything* out of committee that DOES NOT contain a public option and DOES NOT hold insurance companies accountable.

He is a disgrace, as is Harry Reid and the other cowardly DemoCRAPS. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. By Amend he means Total Replacement with text of HR3200
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks for posting. I know I can always count on Sen. Kerry to give it to us straight. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
14. Baucus pissed off the more liberal members by keeping them out of the gang of six
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 12:22 AM by SpartanDem
and then unloading this stinker of a bill. I guess having spent the last few months licking GOP ass he forgot he needs his own party member to support the bill. Next weeks markup could be pretty interesting, let's say someone introduces an amendment to strip out the co-op and add public option. How would Conrad and Baucus vote? Sounds like a lot of potential drama to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. That could be a fascinating hearing to watch - I hope it will be covered
by CSPAN or at least open so we can watch it on the committee's website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
39. The committee vote is scheduled for early next week.
It will be interesting to see what emerges.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
33. Gang of Seven. Hatch dropped out because the process wasn't pro insurance companies to his tastes
That's right. In case we forgot Mad Max originally went with 3 Democrats and 4 Republicans, to add insult to injury only Bingaman is anything in line with a real Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. " **PRESS CONFERENCE CALL ADVISORY** "
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=8653353&mesg_id=8653353

"**PRESS CONFERENCE CALL ADVISORY**

ROCKEFELLER, JACOB HACKER, HOLD CONFERENCE CALL TO DISCUSS IMPORTANCE OF PUBLIC OPTION
Tuesday, September 15th at 3:10PM

Washington, D.C.—Senator John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV will join health care expert Jacob Hacker from Yale University for a conference call with reporters to discuss the public option in health care reform.

Senator Rockefeller is Chairman of the Senate Finance Subcommittee on Health Care, and is the leading proponent of the public health insurance option in the Senate. He has introduced the Consumers Health Care Act (S. 1278) to provide a public option to consumers participating in the health insurance exchange.

Jacob Hacker is the Stanley B. Resor Professor of Political Science at Yale University and the author of several Institute for America's Future reports on the necessity of a public insurance option, including the recent report “Public Plan Choice in Congressional Health Plans: The Good, the Not-So-Good, and the Ugly,” which is available online at..."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Here's information on S 1278 (Rockefeller's Senate comments and the bill
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 06:59 AM by karynnj
Here are Rockefeller's Senate comments:


By Mr. ROCKEFELLER (for himself and Mr. Brown):

S. 1278. A bill to establish the Consumers Choice Health Plan, a public health insurance plan that provides an affordable and accountable health insurance option for consumers; to the Committee on Finance.

Mr. ROCKEFELLER. Mr. President, there is a stark choice looming before Congress. It is the choice between enacting a comprehensive reform bill that truly improves our health care system for the American people or enacting a mediocre reform bill that largely maintains the status quo--which is an ineffective and costly health care system run by the insurance industry. I know that most of my colleagues want the former--a 21st Century health care system that provides meaningful and affordable coverage for all, improves health outcomes, and brings accountability and responsibility back into health care.

I am absolutely convinced that the inclusion of a strong public health insurance plan option is the only way to guarantee that all consumers have affordable, adequate, and accountable options available in the insurance marketplace. It is for this reason that I rise today with my good friend, Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio, to introduce the Consumers Health Care Act of 2009--legislation to provide a strong public plan option in the National Health Insurance Exchange.

One of the most contentious, yet critical, pieces of the national health care reform effort is whether or not Americans should have the option to buy their health insurance from a publicly run organization. In other words, in addition to choosing among numerous health plans run by private insurers, should consumers also have the option of choosing an affordable, stable, and transparent public plan when they are deciding what is best for them and their families? I believe consumers should have the option of choosing a public plan.

Opponents of giving Americans a public option regularly use alarmist rhetoric such as ``big government'' and ``socialized medicine.'' And, somehow, protecting the rights of private health insurers to make profits has become more important to some than offering Americans the choice of a plan that seeks to insure everyone, no matter how sick, that is less expensive, and that is responsible to the American people--not to private profit-seeking stockholders.

I'm not sure when the word ``public'' became such a bad word in the eyes of some of my colleagues. Public means acting in the interest of the general public--which is exactly what we should aspire to in comprehensive health reform.

The private health insurance market has significantly contributed to the broken nature of our health care system, with a long history of cutting coverage off or charging too much for too little. A public plan option--repeat, option--is an effective way to bring competition to the insurance market, hold down costs, and encourage innovation and quality improvements. To deny this option is not only shortsighted, but downright harmful.

Everyone knows the sobering statistics that have highlighted the need for comprehensive health reform. More than 45 million Americans are uninsured and another 25 million are underinsured. Since 1909, the average health insurance premium for a family has increased by 119 percent, from $5,791 in 1999 to $12,680 in 2008. Yet, Americans have seen their benefits decrease and

have faced substantially larger out-of-pocket expenses. An estimated 62 percent of all personal bankruptcies involve medical expenses and 78 percent of the individuals who cited medical expenses in their bankruptcy claims had health insurance. Health care costs already consume 17 percent of the United State's gross domestic product, which everyone can agree is unsustainable.

However, representing the great state of West Virginia has shown me that the need for health reform is far more essential and personal than frightening statistics could ever show. I have listened at roundtable discussions where West Virginians described how the current health care system has failed them. One woman was really struggling to care for both herself and her son. She was uninsured because her son, who had a serious brain disorder, needed 24 hour a day, seven day a week, assistance. Another family wrote to me because their son, who was born with serious congenital heart defects, had reached the $1 million limit on his mother's insurance policy within the first nine months of his life. They were unsure of how to obtain lifesaving treatment for their son, now that the insurance company would no longer pay for his care. I have heard from countless other West Virginians who have been unable to find affordable health care, or have figured out too late that the health insurance they had was inadequate for what they needed.

As Congress works to achieve the transformative reform necessary to create a sustainable health care system, a vital component of this reform is the inclusion of a strong public plan option like the Consumer Choice Health Plan included in the Consumers Health Care Act. A public plan will help establish a new insurance framework, one that compels insurers to provide Americans with the best value for their health care at the best price, rather than the current insurance framework, which is focused on avoiding risk and increasing profits. The Consumer Choice Health Plan will be available for all individuals and small businesses, regardless of health status, and will not be concerned with paying a CEO salary or broker commissions.

The Consumers Health Care Act will increase transparency and accountability throughout the health insurance market, as well as give individuals guaranteed access to health care coverage should they be denied or priced out of affordable private insurance coverage. Currently, insurers are allowed to operate in a black box, with little oversight of their coverage and payment decisions. Individuals with pre-existing conditions are routinely denied access to affordable care. For years, United Health was able to underpay providers and overcharge patients for out-of-network services. The Consumers Health Care Act will address this and other issues by bringing greater transparency to the private health insurance market.

Consumer Choice Health Plans will serve as a vital safety-net of coverage for individuals and families that have been unable to obtain affordable and comprehensive health care coverage through the private market. A private insurance company's desire to earn greater profits will always trump over the need to make health care coverage affordable and accessible to all Americans, and greater insurance regulation is not enough. The Consumers Health Care Act is necessary in order to achieve the sustainable change that the health care system in this country needs.

I trust the good sense of the American public to choose the health coverage they want, and they deserve the choice of a public plan with lower costs and the guarantee of always being there when they need it. The American people trust us to get this right and deliver the best coverage options that will keep their families healthy and safe. The days of packaging half-baked legislation into a bill and calling it transformative reform when it is not have to end now, or the shame is on all of us:

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the text of the bill be printed in the Record.


There being no objection, the text of the bill was ordered to be printed in the Record, as follows:

S. 1278

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Consumers Health Care Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress makes the following findings:

(1) Americans need health care coverage that is always affordable.

(2) Americans need health care coverage that is always adequate.

(3) Americans need health care coverage that is always accountable.

(4) A public health insurance plan option that can compete with private insurance plans is the only way to guarantee that all consumers have affordable, adequate, and accountable options available in the insurance marketplace.

SEC. 3. OFFICE OF HEALTH PLAN MANAGEMENT.

(a) Establishment.--Not later than July 1, 2010, there shall be established within the Department of Health and Human Services an Office of Health Plan Management (referred to in this Act as the ``Office''). The Office shall be headed by a Director (referred to in this Act as the ``Director'') who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(b) Compensation.--The Director shall be paid at the annual rate of pay for a position at level II of the Executive Schedule under section 5313 of title 5, United States Code.

(c) Limitation.--Neither the Director nor the Office shall participate in the administration of the National Health Insurance Exchange (as defined in section 7) or the promulgation or administration of any regulation regarding the health insurance industry.

(d) Personnel and Operations Authority.--The Director shall have the same general authorities with respect to personnel and operations of the Office as the heads of other agencies and departments of the Federal Government have with respect to such agencies and departments.

SEC. 4. CONSUMER CHOICE HEALTH PLAN.

(a) In General.--The Office shall establish and administer the Consumer Choice Health Plan (referred to in this Act as the ``Plan'') to provide for health insurance coverage that is made available to all eligible individuals (as described in subsection (d)(1)) in the United States and its territories.

(b) Regulatory Compliance.--The Plan shall comply with--

(1) all regulations and requirements that are applicable with respect to other health insurance plans that are offered through the National Health Insurance Exchange; and

(2) any additional regulations and requirements, as determined by the Director.

(c) Benefits.--

(1) IN GENERAL.--The Plan shall offer health insurance coverage at different benefit levels, provided that such benefits are commensurate with the required benefit levels to be provided by a health insurance plan under the National Health Insurance Exchange.

(2) MINIMUM BENEFITS FOR CHILDREN.--

(A) IN GENERAL.--The minimum benefit level available under the Plan for children shall include at least the services described in the most recently published version of the ``Maternal and Child Health Plan Benefit Model'' developed by the National Business Group on Health.

(B) AMENDMENT OF BENEFIT LEVEL.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Director of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, may amend the benefits described in subparagraph (A) based on the most recent peer-reviewed and evidence-based data.

(d) Eligibility and Enrollment.--

(1) ELIGIBILITY.--An individual who is eligible to purchase coverage from a health insurance plan through the National Health Insurance Exchange shall be eligible to enroll in the Plan.

(2) ENROLLMENT PROCESS.--An individual may enroll in the Plan only in such manner and form as may be prescribed by applicable regulations, and only during an enrollment period as prescribed by the Director.

(3) EMPLOYER ENROLLMENT.--An employer shall be eligible to purchase health insurance coverage for their employees and the employees' dependents to the extent provided for all health benefits plans under the National Health Insurance Exchange.

(4) SATISFACTION OF INDIVIDUAL MANDATE REQUIREMENT.--An individual's enrollment with the Plan shall be treated as satisfying any requirement under Federal law for such individual to demonstrate enrollment in health insurance or benefits coverage.

(e) Providers.--

(1) NETWORK REQUIREMENT.--

(A) MEDICARE.--A participating provider who is voluntarily providing health care services under the Medicare program established under title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) shall be required to provide services to any individual enrolled in the Plan.

(B) MEDICAID AND CHIP.--A provider of health care services under the Medicaid program established under title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.), or the CHIP program established under title XXI of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1397aa et seq.), shall be required to provide services to any individual enrolled in the Plan.

(2) EXCEPTION.--Paragraph (1) shall not be construed as requiring a provider to accept new patients due to bona fide capacity limitations of the provider.

(3) OPT-OUT PROVISION.--

(A) MEDICARE.--A participating provider as described under paragraph (1)(A) shall be required to provide services to any individual enrolled in the Plan for the 3-year period following the establishment of the Plan. Upon the expiration of the 3-year period, a participating provider in the Plan may elect to become a non-participating provider without affecting their status as a participating provider under the Medicare program.

(B) MEDICAID AND CHIP.--A provider as described under paragraph (1)(B) shall be required to provide services to any individual enrolled in the Plan for the 3-year period following the establishment of the Plan. Upon the expiration of the 3-year period, a provider in the Plan may elect to cease provision of services under the Plan without affecting their status as a provider under the Medicaid program or the CHIP program.

(4) PAYMENT RATES.--

(A) INITIAL PAYMENT RATES.--

(i) IN GENERAL.--During the 2-year period following the establishment of the Plan, providers shall be reimbursed at such payment rates as are applicable under the Medicare program.

(ii) ADJUSTMENT.--The Director may reimburse providers at rates lower or higher than applicable under the Medicare program if the Director determines that the adjusted rates are appropriate and ensure that enrollees in the Plan are provided with adequate access to health care services.

(B) SUBSEQUENT PAYMENT RATES.--Subject to subparagraph (C), upon the expiration of the 2-year period following the establishment of the Plan, the Director shall develop payment rates for reimbursement of providers in order to maintain an adequate provider network necessary to assure that enrollees in the Plan have adequate access to health care. In determining such payment rates, the Director shall consider--

(i) competitive provider payment rates in both the public and private sectors;

(ii) best practices among providers;

(iii) integrated models of care delivery (including medical home and chronic care coordination models);

(iv) geographic variation in health care costs;

(v) evidence-based practices;

(vi) quality improvement;

(vii) use of health information technology; and

(viii) any additional measures, as determined by the Director.

(C) PAYMENT RATE CONSULTATION.--The Director shall determine payment rates under subparagraph (B) in consultation with providers participating under the Plan, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, and the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission.

(5) ADOPTION OF MEDICARE REFORMS.--The Plan may adopt Medicare system delivery reforms that provide patients with a coordinated system of care and make changes to the provider payment structure.

(f) Subsidies.--The Plan shall be eligible to accept subsidies, including subsidies for the enrollment of individuals under the Plan, in the same manner and to the same extent as other health insurance plans offered through the National Health Insurance Exchange.

(g) Financing.--

(1) TRANSITIONAL FUNDING.--

(A) IN GENERAL.--In order to provide for adequate funding of the Plan in advance of receipt of payments as described in paragraph (2), beginning July 1, 2010, there are transferred to the Plan from the general fund of the Treasury such amounts as may be necessary for operation of the Plan until the end of the 3-year period following the establishment of the Plan.

GPO's PDF

(B) RETURN OF FUNDS.--Upon the expiration of the 3-year period following the establishment of the Plan, the Director shall enter into a repayment schedule with the Secretary of the Treasury to provide for repayment of funds provided under subparagraph (A). Any expenditures made by the Plan pursuant to a repayment schedule established under this subparagraph shall not constitute administrative expenses as described in paragraph (2)(B).

(2) SELF-FINANCING.--

(A) IN GENERAL.--The Plan shall be financially self-sustaining insofar as funds used for operation of the Plan (including benefits, administration, and marketing) shall be derived from--

(i) insurance premium payments and subsidies for individuals enrolled in the Plan; and

(ii) payments made to the Plan by employers that do not offer health insurance coverage to their employees.

(B) LIMITATION ON ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.--Not more than 5 percent of the amounts provided under subparagraph (A) may be used for the annual administrative costs of the Plan.

(3) CONTINGENCY RESERVE.--

(A) IN GENERAL.--The Director shall establish and fund a contingency reserve for the Plan in a form similar to the contingency reserve provided for health benefits plans under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program under chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code.

(B) REVENUE.--Any revenue generated through the contingency reserve established in subparagraph (A) shall be transferred to the Plan for the purpose of reducing enrollee premiums, reducing enrollee cost-sharing, increasing enrollee benefits, or any combination thereof.

(4) GAO FINANCIAL AUDIT AND REPORT.--Beginning not later than October 1, 2011, the Comptroller General shall conduct an annual audit of the financial statements and records of the Plan, in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards, and submit an annual report on such audit to the Congress.

(5) SUPERMAJORITY REQUIREMENT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING.--Upon certification by the Comptroller General that the financial audit described in paragraph (4) indicates that the Plan is insolvent, supplemental funding may be appropriated for the Plan if such measure receives not less than a three-fifths vote of approval of the total number of Members of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

(h) Transparency.--

(1) IN GENERAL.--Beginning with the first year of operation of the Plan through the National Health Insurance Exchange, the Director shall provide standards and undertake activities for promoting transparency in costs, benefits, and other factors for health insurance coverage provided under the Plan.

(2) STANDARD DEFINITIONS OF INSURANCE AND MEDICAL TERMS.--

(A) IN GENERAL.--The Director shall provide for the development of standards for the definitions of terms used in health insurance coverage under the Plan, including insurance-related terms (including the insurance-related terms described in subparagraph (B)) and medical terms (including the medical terms described in subparagraph (C)).

(B) INSURANCE-RELATED TERMS.--The insurance-related terms described in this subparagraph are premium, deductible, co-insurance, co-payment, out-of-pocket limit, preferred provider, non-preferred provider, out-of-network co-payments, UCR (usual, customary and reasonable) fees, excluded services, grievance and appeals, and such other terms as the Director determines are important to define so that consumers may compare health insurance coverage and understand the terms of their coverage.

(C) MEDICAL TERMS.--The medical terms described in this subparagraph are hospitalization, hospital outpatient care, emergency room care, physician services, prescription drug coverage, durable medical equipment, home health care, skilled nursing care, rehabilitation services, hospice services, emergency medical transportation, and such other terms as the Director determines are important to define so that consumers may compare the medical benefits offered by health insurance plans and understand the extent of those medical benefits (or exceptions to those benefits).

(3) DISCLOSURE.--

(A) IN GENERAL.--In carrying out this subsection, the Director shall disclose to Plan enrollees, potential enrollees, in-network health care providers, and others (through a publically available Internet website and other appropriate means) relevant information regarding each policy of health insurance coverage marketed or in force (in such standardized manner as determined by the Director), including--

(i) full policy contract language; and

(ii) a summary of the information described in paragraph (4).

(B) PERSONALIZED STATEMENT.--The Director shall disclose to enrollees (in such standardized manner as determined by the Director) an annual personalized statement that summarizes use of health care services and payment of claims with respect to an enrollee (and covered dependents) under health insurance coverage provided through the Plan in the preceding year.

(4) REQUIRED INFORMATION.--The information described in this paragraph includes, but is not limited to, the following:

(A) Data on the price of each new policy of health insurance coverage and renewal rating practices.

(B) Claims payment policies and practices, including how many and how quickly claims were paid.

(C) Provider fee schedules and usual, customary, and reasonable fees (for both in-network and out-of-network providers).

(D) Provider participation and provider directories.

(E) Loss ratios, including detailed information about amount and type of non-claims expenses.

(F) Covered benefits, cost-sharing, and amount of payment provided toward each type of service identified as a covered benefit, including preventive care services recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force.

(G) Civil or criminal actions successfully concluded against the Plan by any governmental entity.

(H) Benefit exclusions and limits.

(5) DEVELOPMENT OF PATIENT CLAIMS SCENARIOS.--

(A) IN GENERAL.--In order to improve the ability of individuals and employers to compare the coverage and relative value provided under the Plan, the Director shall develop and make publically available a series of patient claims scenarios under which benefits (including out-of-pocket costs) under the Plan are simulated for certain common or expensive conditions or courses of treatment (including maternity care, breast cancer, heart disease, diabetes management, and well-child visits).

(B) CONSULTATION.--The Director shall develop the patient claims scenarios described in subparagraph (A)--

(i) in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, health professional societies, patient advocates, and other entities as deemed necessary by the Director; and

(ii) based upon recognized clinical practice guidelines.

(6) MANNER OF DISCLOSURE.--The Director shall disclose the information under this subsection--

(A) with all marketing materials;

(B) on the website for the Plan; and

(C) at other times upon request.

SEC. 5. ESTABLISHMENT OF AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE TRUST.

(a) Establishment.--As of the date of enactment of this Act, there is authorized to be established a non-profit corporation that shall be known as the ``America's Health Insurance Trust'' (referred to in this Act as the ``Trust''), which is neither an agency nor establishment of the United States Government.

(b) Location; Service of Process.--The Trust shall maintain its principal office within the District of Columbia and have a designated agent in the District of Columbia to receive service of process for the Trust. Notice to or service on the agent shall be deemed as notice to or service on the corporation.

(c) Application of Provisions.--The Trust shall be subject to the provisions of this section and, to the extent consistent with this section, to the District of Columbia Nonprofit Corporation Act.

(d) Tax Exempt Status.--The Trust shall be treated as a nonprofit organization described under section 170(c)(2)(B) and section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

(e) Board of Directors.--

(1) IN GENERAL.--The Board of Directors of the Trust (referred to in this Act as the ``Board'') shall consist of 19 voting members appointed by the Comptroller General.

(2) TERMS.--

(A) IN GENERAL.--Subject to subparagraph (C), each member of the Board shall serve for a term of 6 years.

(B) LIMITATION.--No individual shall be appointed to the Board for more than 2 consecutive terms.

(C) INITIAL MEMBERS.--The initial members of the Board shall be appointed by the Comptroller General not later than October 1, 2010, and shall serve terms as follows:

(i) 8 members shall be appointed for a term of 5 years.

(ii) 8 members shall be appointed for a term of 3 years.

(iii) 3 members shall be appointed for a term of 1 year.

(D) EXPIRATION OF TERM.--Any member of the Board whose term has expired may serve until such member's successor has taken office, or until the end of the calendar year in which such member's term has expired, whichever is earlier.

(E) VACANCIES.--

(i) IN GENERAL.--Any member appointed to fill a vacancy prior to the expiration of the term for which such member's predecessor was appointed shall be appointed for the remainder of such term.

(ii) VACANCIES NOT TO AFFECT POWER OF BOARD.--A vacancy on the Board shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment was made.

(3) CHAIRPERSON AND VICE-CHAIRPERSON.--

(A) IN GENERAL.--The Comptroller General shall designate a Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson of the Board from among the members of the Board.

(B) TERM.--The members designated as Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson shall serve for a period of 3 years.

(4) CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.--An individual may not serve on the Board if such individual (or an immediate family member of such individual) is employed by or has a financial interest in--

(A) an organization that provides a health insurance plan;

(B) a pharmaceutical manufacturer; or

(C) any subsidiary entities of an organization described in subparagraphs (A) or (B).

(5) COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD.--

(A) POLITICAL PARTIES.--Not more than 10 members of the Board may be affiliated with the same political party.

(B) DIVERSITY.--In appointing members under this paragraph, the Comptroller General shall ensure that such members provide appropriately diverse representation with respect to race, ethnicity, age, gender, and geography.

(C) CONSUMER REPRESENTATION.--10 members of the Board shall be independent and non-conflicted individuals representing the interests of health care consumers. Each member selected under this subparagraph shall represent 1 of the 10 Department of Health and Human Services regions in the United States.

(D) REMAINING REPRESENTATION.--

(i) IN GENERAL.--9 members of the Board shall be selected based on relevant experience, including expertise in--

(I) community affairs;

(II) Federal, State, and local government;

(III) health professions and administration;

(IV) business, finance, and accounting;

(V) legal affairs;

(VI) insurance;

(VII) trade unions;

(VIII) social services; and

(IX) any additional areas as determined by the Comptroller General.

(ii) INCOME FROM HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY.--Not more than 4 of the members selected under this subparagraph shall earn more than 10 percent of their income from the health care industry.

(6) MEETINGS AND HEARINGS.--The Board shall meet and hold hearings at the call of the Chairperson or a majority of its members. Meetings of the Board on matters not related to personnel shall be open to the public and advertised through public notice at least 7 days prior to the meeting.

(7) QUORUM.--A majority of the members of the Board shall constitute a quorum for purposes of conducting the duties of the Trust, but a lesser number of members may meet and hold hearings.

(8) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND STAFF; PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES.--The Board may--

(A) employ and fix the compensation of an Executive Director and such other personnel as may be necessary to carry out the duties of the Trust;

(B) seek such assistance and support as may be required in the performance of the duties of the Trust from appropriate departments and agencies of the Federal Government;

(C) enter into contracts or other arrangements and make such payments as may be necessary for performance of the duties of the Trust;

(D) provide travel, subsistence, and per diem compensation for individuals performing the duties of the Trust, including members of the Advisory Council (as described in subsection (f)); and

(E) prescribe such rules, regulations, and bylaws as the Board determines necessary with respect to the internal organization and operation of the Trust.

(9) LOBBYING COOLING-OFF PERIOD FOR MEMBERS OF THE BOARD.--Section 207(c) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the following:

``(3) MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE AMERICA'


S HEALTH INSURANCE TRUST.--Paragraph (1) shall apply to a member of the Board of Directors of the America's Health Insurance Trust who was appointed to the Board as of the day before the date of enactment of the Consumers Health Care Act of 2009.''.

(f) Advisory Council.--

(1) ESTABLISHMENT.--The Board shall establish an advisory council that shall be comprised of the insurance commissioners of each State (including the District of Columbia) to advise the Board on the development and impact of measures to improve the transparency and accountability of health insurance plans provided through the National Health Insurance Exchange.

(2) MEETINGS.--The advisory council shall meet not less than twice a year and at the request of the Board.

(g) Financial Oversight.--

(1) CONTRACT FOR AUDITS.--The Trust shall provide for financial audits of the Trust on an annual basis by a private entity with expertise in conducting financial audits.

(2) REVIEW AND REPORT ON AUDITS.--The Comptroller General shall--

(A) review and evaluate the results of the audits conducted pursuant to paragraph (1); and

(B) submit a report to Congress containing the results and review of such audits, including an analysis of the adequacy and use of the funding for the Trust and its activities.

(h) Rules on Gifts and Outside Contributions.--

(1) GIFTS.--The Trust (including the Board and any staff acting on behalf of the Trust) shall not accept gifts, bequeaths, or donations of services or property.

(2) PROHIBITION ON OUTSIDE FUNDING OR CONTRIBUTIONS.--The Trust shall not--

(A) establish a corporation other than as provided under this section; or

(B) accept any funds or contributions other than as provided under this section.

(i) America'


s Health Insurance Trust Fund.--

(1) IN GENERAL.--There is established in the Treasury a trust fund to be known as the ``America's Health Insurance Trust Fund'' (referred to in this section as the ``Trust Fund''), consisting of such amounts as may be credited to the Trust Fund as provided under this subsection.

(2) TRANSFER.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer to the Trust Fund out of the general fund of the Treasury amounts determined by the Secretary to be equivalent to the amounts received into such general fund that are attributable to the fees collected under sections 4375 and 4376 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to fees on health insurance policies and self-insured health plans).

(3) FINANCING FOR FUND FROM FEES ON INSURED AND SELF-INSURED HEALTH PLANS.--

(A) GENERAL RULE.--Chapter 34 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subchapter:


``Subchapter B--Insured and Self-Insured Health Plans

``Sec..4375..Health insurance.

``Sec..4376..Self-insured health plans.

``Sec..4377..Definitions and special rules.

``SEC. 4375. HEALTH INSURANCE.

``(a) Imposition of Fee.--In the case of any specified health insurance policy issued after October 1, 2009, there is hereby imposed a fee equal to--

``(1) for policies issued during fiscal years 2010 through 2013, 50 cents multiplied by the average number of lives covered under the policy; and

``(2) for policies issued after September 30, 2013, $1 multiplied by the average number of lives covered under the policy.

``(b) Liability for Fee.--The fee imposed by subsection (a) shall be paid by the issuer of the policy.

``(c) Specified Health Insurance Policy.--For purposes of this section:

``(1) IN GENERAL.--Except as otherwise provided in this section, the term `specified health insurance policy' means any accident or health insurance policy (including a policy under a group health plan) issued with respect to individuals residing in the United States.

``(2) EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN POLICIES.--The term `specified health insurance policy' does not include any insurance if substantially all of its coverage is of excepted benefits described in section 9832(c).

``(3) TREATMENT OF PREPAID HEALTH COVERAGE ARRANGEMENTS.--

``(A) IN GENERAL.--In the case of any arrangement described in subparagraph (B)--

``(i) such arrangement shall be treated as a specified health insurance policy, and

``(ii) the person referred to in such subparagraph shall be treated as the issuer.

``(B) DESCRIPTION OF ARRANGEMENTS.--An arrangement is described in this subparagraph if under such arrangement fixed payments or premiums are received as consideration for any person's agreement to provide or arrange for the provision of accident or health coverage to residents of the United States, regardless of how such coverage is provided or arranged to be provided.

``(d) Adjustments for Increases in Health Care Spending.--In the case of any policy issued in any fiscal year beginning after September 30, 2014, the dollar amount in effect under subsection (a) for such policy shall be equal to the sum of such dollar amount for policies issued in the previous fiscal year (determined after the application of this subsection), plus an amount equal to the product of--

``(1) such dollar amount for policies issued in the previous fiscal year, multiplied by

``(2) the percentage increase in the projected per capita amount of National Health Expenditures from the calendar year in which the previous fiscal year ends to the calendar year in which the fiscal year involved ends, as most recently published by the Secretary of Health and Human Services before the beginning of the fiscal year.

``(e) Termination.--This section shall not apply to policy years ending after September 30, 2019.

``SEC. 4376. SELF-INSURED HEALTH PLANS.

``(a) Imposition of Fee.--In the case of any applicable self-insured health plan issued after October 1, 2009, there is hereby imposed a fee equal to--

``(1) for plans issued during fiscal years 2010 through 2013, 50 cents multiplied by the average number of lives covered under the plan; and

``(2) for plans issued after September 30, 2013, $1 multiplied by the average number of lives covered under the plans.

``(b) Liability for Fee.--

``(1) IN GENERAL.--The fee imposed by subsection (a) shall be paid by the plan sponsor.

``(2) PLAN SPONSOR.--For purposes of paragraph (1) the term `plan sponsor' means--

``(A) the employer in the case of a plan established or maintained by a single employer,

``(B) the employee organization in the case of a plan established or maintained by an employee organization,

``(C) in the case of--

``(i) a plan established or maintained by 2 or more employers or jointly by 1 or more employers and 1 or more employee organizations,

``(D) by a voluntary employees' beneficiary association described in section 501(c)(9),

``(E) by any organization described in section 501(c)(6), or

``(F) in the case of a plan not described in the preceding subparagraphs, by a multiple employer welfare arrangement (as defined in section 3(40) of Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974), a rural electric cooperative (as defined in section 3(40)(B)(iv) of such Act), or a rural telephone cooperative association (as defined in section 3(40)(B)(v) of such Act).

``(d) Adjustments for Increases in Health Care Spending.--In the case of any plan issued in any fiscal year beginning after September 30, 2014, the dollar amount in effect under subsection (a) for such plan shall be equal to the sum of such dollar amount for plans issued in the previous fiscal year (determined after the application of this subsection), plus an amount equal to the product of--

``(1) such dollar amount for plans issued in the previous fiscal year, multiplied by

``(2) the percentage increase in the projected per capita amount of National Health Expenditures from the calendar year in which the previous fiscal year ends to the calendar year in which the fiscal year involved ends, as most recently published by the Secretary of Health and Human Services before the beginning of the fiscal year.

``(e) Termination.--This section shall not apply to plans issued after September 30, 2019.

``SEC. 4377. DEFINITIONS AND SPECIAL RULES.

``(a) Definitions.--For purposes of this subchapter--

``(1) ACCIDENT AND HEALTH COVERAGE.--The term `accident and health coverage' means any coverage which, if provided by an insurance policy, would cause such policy to be a specified health insurance policy (as defined in section 4375(c)).

``(2) INSURANCE POLICY.--The term `insurance policy' means any policy or other instrument whereby a contract of insurance is issued, renewed, or extended.

``(3) UNITED STATES.--The term `United States' includes any possession of the United States.

``(b) Treatment of Governmental Entities.--

``(1) IN GENERAL.--For purposes of this subchapter--

``(A) the term `person' includes any governmental entity, and

``(B) notwithstanding any other law or rule of law, governmental entities shall not be exempt from the fees imposed by this subchapter except as provided in paragraph (2).

``(2) TREATMENT OF EXEMPT GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS.--In the case of an exempt governmental program, no fee shall be imposed under section 4375 or section 4376 on any covered policy or plan under such program.

``(3) EXEMPT GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAM DEFINED.--For purposes of this subchapter, the term `exempt governmental program' means--

``(A) any insurance program established under title XVIII of the Social Security Act,

``(B) the medical assistance program established by title XIX or XXI of the Social Security Act,

``(C) the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program under chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code,

``(D) the Consumer Choice Health Plan established under the Consumers Health Care Act of 2009,

``(E) any program established by Federal law for providing medical care (other than through insurance policies) to individuals (or the spouses and dependents thereof) by reason of such individuals being--

``(i) members of the Armed Forces of the United States, or

``(ii) veterans, and

``(F) any program established by Federal law for providing medical care (other than through insurance policies) to members of Indian tribes (as defined in section 4(d) of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act).

``(c) Treatment as Tax.--For purposes of subtitle F, the fees imposed by this subchapter shall be treated as if they were taxes.

``(d) No Cover Over to Possessions.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no amount collected under this subchapter shall be covered over to any possession of the United States.''.

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.--

(i) Chapter 34 of such Code is amended by striking the chapter heading and inserting the following:


``CHAPTER 34--TAXES ON CERTAIN INSURANCE POLICIES

``SUBCHAPTER A. POLICIES ISSUED BY FOREIGN INSURERS

``SUBCHAPTER B. INSURED AND SELF-INSURED HEALTH PLANS


``Subchapter A--Policies Issued By Foreign Insurers''.

(ii) The table of chapters for subtitle D of such Code is amended by striking the item relating to chapter 34 and inserting the following new item:

``Chapter 34--Taxes on Certain Insurance Policies''.

SEC. 6. DUTIES OF AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE TRUST.

(a) Insurance Plan Rankings and Website.--

(1) WEB-BASED MATERIALS.--The Trust shall establish and maintain a website that provides informational materials regarding the health insurance plans provided through the National Health Insurance Exchange, including appropriate links for all available State insurance commissioner websites.

(2) PLAN RANKINGS.--The Trust shall develop and publish annual rankings of the health insurance plans provided through the National Health Insurance Exchange, based on the assignment of a letter grade between ``grade A'' (highest) and ``grade F'' (lowest). The Trust shall provide for a comparative evaluation of each plan based upon--

(A) administrative expenditures;

(B) affordability of coverage;

(C) adequacy of coverage;

(D) timeliness and adequacy of consumer claims processing;

(E) available consumer complaint systems;

(F) grievance and appeals processes;

(G) transparency;

(H) consumer satisfaction; and

(I) any additional measures as determined by the Board.

(3) INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON WEBSITE BY ZIP CODE.--The annual rankings of the health insurance plans (as described in paragraph (2)) shall be available on the website for the Trust (as described in paragraph (1)), and the website for the National Health Insurance Exchange, in a manner that is searchable and sortable by zip code.

(4) CONSUMER FEEDBACK.--

(A) CONSUMER COMPLAINTS.--The Trust shall develop written and web-based methods for individuals to provide recommendations and complaints regarding the health insurance plans provided through the National Health Insurance Exchange.

(B) CONSUMER SURVEYS.--The Trust shall obtain meaningful consumer input, including consumer surveys, that measure the extent to which an individual receives the services and supports described in the individual's health insurance plan and the individual's satisfaction with such services and supports.

(b) Data Sharing.--

(1) IN GENERAL.--An organization that provides a health insurance plan through the National Health Insurance Exchange shall provide the Trust with all information and data that is necessary for improving transparency, monitoring, and oversight of such plans.

(2) ANNUAL DISCLOSURE.--Beginning with the first full year of operation of the National Health Insurance Exchange, an organization that provides a health insurance plan through the National Health Insurance Exchange shall annually provide the Trust with appropriate information regarding the following:

(A) Name of the plan.

(B) Levels of available plan benefits.

(C) Description of plan benefits.

(D) Number of enrollees under the plan.

(E) Demographic profile of enrollees under the plan.

(F) Number of claims paid to enrollees.

(G) Number of enrollees that terminated their coverage under the plan.

(H) Total operating cost for the plan (including administrative costs).

(I) Patterns of utilization of the plan's services.

(J) Availability, accessibility, and acceptability of the plan's services.

(K) Such information as the Trust may require demonstrating that the organization has a fiscally sound operation.

(L) Any additional information as determined by the Trust.

(3) FORM AND MANNER OF INFORMATION.--Information to be provided to the Trust under paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be provided--

(A) in such form and manner as specified by the Trust; and

(B) within 30 days of the date of receipt of the request for such information, or within such extended period as the Trust deems appropriate.

(4) INFORMATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.--

(A) IN GENERAL.--Any information regarding the health insurance plans that are offered through the National Health Insurance Exchange that has been provided to the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall also be made available (as deemed appropriate by the Secretary) to the Trust for the purpose of improving transparency, monitoring, and oversight of such plans. Such information may include, but is not limited to, the following:

GPO's PDF

(i) Underwriting guidelines to ensure compliance with applicable Federal health insurance requirements.

(ii) Rating practices to ensure compliance with applicable Federal health insurance requirements.

(iii) Enrollment and disenrollment data, including information the Secretary may need to detect patterns of discrimination against individuals based on health status or other characteristics, to ensure compliance with applicable Federal health insurance requirements (including non-discrimination in group coverage, guaranteed issue, and guaranteed renewability requirements applicable in all markets).

(iv) Post-claims underwriting and rescission practices to ensure compliance with applicable Federal health insurance requirements relating to guaranteed renewability.

(v) Marketing materials and agent guidelines to ensure compliance with applicable Federal health insurance requirements.

(vi) Data on the imposition of pre-existing condition exclusion periods and claims subjected to such exclusion periods.

(vii) Information on issuance of certificates of creditable coverage.

(viii) Information on cost-sharing and payments with respect to any out-of-network coverage.

(ix) The application to issuers of penalties for violation of applicable Federal health insurance requirements (including failure to produce requested information).

(x) Such other information as the Trust may determine to be necessary to verify compliance with the requirements of this Act.

(B) REQUIRED DISCLOSURE.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall provide the Trust with all consumer claims data or information that has been provided to the Secretary by any health insurance plan that is offered through the National Health Insurance Exchange.

(C) PERIOD FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION.--Information to be provided to the Trust under this paragraph shall be provided by the Secretary within 30 days of the date of receipt of the request for such information, or within such extended period as the Secretary and the Trust mutually deem appropriate.

(5) NON-DISCLOSURE OF HEALTH INSURANCE DATA.--The Trust shall prevent disclosure of any data or information provided under this paragraph that the Trust determines is proprietary or qualifies as a trade secret subject to withholding from public dissemination. Any data or information provided under this paragraph shall not be subject to disclosure under section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of Information Act).

SEC. 7. DEFINITION OF NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE EXCHANGE.

In this Act, the term ``National Health Insurance Exchange'' means a mechanism established or recognized under Federal law for coordinating the offering of health insurance coverage to individuals in the United States through the establishment of standards for benefits, cost-sharing, and premiums for such health insurance coverage.

By Mr. CORKER (for himself, Mr. WARNER, and Mr. BENNETT):

S. 1280. A bill to authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to delegate management authority over troubled assets purchased under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, to require the establishment of a trust to manage assets of certain designated TARP recipients, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Mr. CORKER. Mr. President, I rise to speak, briefly, about a bill Senator Warner from Virginia and I are introducing today. The title of the bill is the TARP Recipient Ownership Trust Act of 2009.

This bill intends to deal with the issue that our government finds itself in a position of large ownership in companies--something I think none of us ever imagined would be the case some time ago.

This piece of legislation only deals with TARP recipients. But what it does is solve the unease in the problem that many of us have in the Senate and in the Congress with the fact that we have such large government ownerships in companies.

What this bill would do would be to set up a trust for all TARP company ownership to be put in when stakes are larger than 20 percent of the company. What it would do is give the administration the ability to appoint three trustees to have a fiduciary obligation to the taxpayers of this country. It would be my hope that these trustees would be people such as Warren Buffett or Jack Welch or people similar to them, whom we--all of us in our country--respect and consider to certainly be knowledgeable market participants.

These trustees will be paid no money. They would do this as a duty to our country. While their objective would be to look at these companies with a fiduciary responsibility to the taxpayers, they also would be given the direction to unload these ownerships by December 24, 2011. I think this would go a long way toward giving all of us more comfort that there was not a political agenda with any of these companies, that these companies were being dealt with in a way that is fair and appropriate to the taxpayers. I think this is something that, while it is not perfect, would do what is necessary to make us all feel a lot more comfortable about where we are.

No. 1, we would have three neutral, well-respected businesspeople looking after our taxpayers' interests. Hopefully, that would shield as much as possible any kind of political involvement in those companies. Secondly, obviously, they would be given the directive to unload this ownership by December 24, 2011, as I have mentioned. They can come back at that time. If they feel, for some reason, this is not in the taxpayers' interest, they can come back to us at that time and seek additional time, should they think it is in our interest as taxpayers to extend that period of time.

This is a bipartisan piece of legislation. This is not done with any kind of ax to grind. This legislation is being offered, truly, just to solve this rub we all find ourselves in, that the American citizens find themselves in, where we have large ownership stakes.

Specifically, today, because of the ownership stakes that exist, the three companies that would be affected would be AIG, Citigroup, and, of course, the automobile company, General Motors. There could be additional companies that, through conversions to common equity, might be affected by this.

I think this is a very commonsense piece of legislation that I hope will have broad bipartisan support.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the text of the bill be printed in the Record.

There being no objection, the text of the bill was ordered to be printed in the Record, as follows:

S. 1280

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``TARP Recipient Ownership Trust Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY TO DELEGATE TARP ASSET MANAGEMENT.

Section 106(b) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5216(b)) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: ``, and the Secretary may delegate such management authority to a private entity, as the Secretary determines appropriate, with respect to any entity assisted under this Act''.

SEC. 3. CREATION OF MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY FOR DESIGNATED TARP RECIPIENTS.

(a) Federal Assistance Limited.--Notwithstanding any provision of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, or any other provision of law, no funds may be expended under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or any other provision of that Act, on or after the date of enactment of this Act, until the Secretary of the Treasury transfers all voting, nonvoting, and common equity in any designated TARP recipient to a limited liability company established by the Secretary for such purpose, to be held and managed in trust on behalf of the United States taxpayers.

(b) Appointment of Trustees.--

(1) IN GENERAL.--The President shall appoint 3 independent trustees to manage the equity held in the trust, separate and apart from the United States Government.

(2) CRITERIA.--Trustees appointed under this subsection--

(A) may not be elected or appointed Government officials;

(B) shall serve at the pleasure of the President, and may be removed for just cause in violation of their fiduciary responsibilities only; and

(C) shall serve without compensation for their services under this section.

(c) Duties of Trust.--Pursuant to protecting the interests and investment of the United States taxpayer, the trust established under this section shall, with the purpose of maximizing the profitability of the designated TARP recipient--

(1) exercise the voting rights of the shares of the taxpayer on all core governance issues;

(2) select the representation on the boards of directors of any designated TARP recipient; and

(3) have a fiduciary duty to the American taxpayer for the maximization of the return on the investment of the taxpayer made under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, in the same manner and to the same extent that any director of an issuer of securities has with respect to its

shareholders under the securities laws and all applications of State law.

(d) Liquidation.--The trustees shall liquidate the trust established under this section, including the assets held by such trust, not later than December 24, 2011, unless the trustees submit a report to Congress that liquidation would not maximize the profitability of the company and the return on investment to the taxpayer.

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

As used in this Act--

(1) the term ``designated TARP recipient'' means any entity that has received, or will receive, financial assistance under the Troubled Asset Relief Program or any other provision of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-343), such that the Federal Government holds or controls, or will hold or control at a future date, not less than a 20 percent ownership stake in the company as a result of such assistance;

(2) the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the Treasury or the designee of the Secretary; and

(3) the terms ``director'', ``issuer'', ``securities'', and ``securities laws'' have the same meanings as in section 3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c).



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. I am confused
Is this a separate bill that he introduced yesterday? How does it relate to the rest that is going on in the Senate? Maybe the answer is in the texts that you quoted, but I do not have time to read it all now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. It is the bill mentioned in the press conference statement (which thankfully had the bill number)
I suspect that it was intended to replace parts of Baucus' bill. I would assume that Rockefeller and the staff of the Health subcommittee worked on this.

I would guess that this one of the amendments Kerry referred to that Democrats will offer. The interesting question might be how many Democrats on the committee will back it over the Baucus/Conrad alternative. If neither have any Republican support, Kerry's tug of war analogy might be about right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. Thanks for posting this.
In Section 7 of your post,
SEC. 7. DEFINITION OF NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE EXCHANGE.
After the first paragraph in Section 7, it switches from the Health Bill to a discussion of Tarp.

Did I take wrong turn?

I am especially interested in "The Exchange", and find this area one of the most troubling aspects of the House Bill (HR 3200).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. OOPs - My cut and paste took Corker's speech which was after Rockefeller's speech and bill
All of what is in the Senate record is in the post - Everything after "Mr. Corker" should not be there. (I didn't have time to read it when I posted it - I read only his speech, but thought as it was on the next few pages in the Senate record, I should cut and paste it too. (Now, I now it was useful to someone. :) )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. Thanks and here is the govtrack link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
29. Good info in this thread
Thanks!

Way to go, Kerry. Screw you, Baucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Very succinctly (and appropriately) put :-) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
30. I love it when "the big club" issues press releases.
They always are written to mollify those who aren't in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
34. Has Baucus got a bill out yet???
:shrug: I thought I heard on Faux news radio (consider the source) that the "Gang of Six" would be previewing the legislation to governors(?) today before unveiling it to the public. Must not be great, although I don't really think any of us have been expecting anything better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Not yet, I am sure he will wait until he can get the most media coverage on this.
Baucus can never seem to get enough media attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Why he would be *proud* of this legislation
or how he has handled the process is a mystery to me. However, at least as far as I'm concerned, I'll be happy if he gets a POS bill out of committee rather than nothing at all just so that we can keep the process alive and moving. What he finally puts out there stands absolutely no chance of passing anyway and none of the Republicans are going to vote for it anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Helmet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
40. Obama should embrace and tout the HELP bill - it was Teddy's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC