|
Step One: The Republicans go on a punch drunk "borrow and spend" rampage (at the same time not making nor requiring ANY "plans" to pay back the cost of their policies) and a "LET'S DEREGULATE EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE" mentality whenever they're in WH, which have consistently proven to cause HUGE budgt deficits and other myriad economic problems (i.e. financial meltdowns like the one that happened last year). The resulting economic chaos that we are thrown into is then (magically) blamed on the next Democratic POTUS who is then thoroughly demonized by Republicans and their enablers in the corporate media if they even think about raising taxes on the wealthiest 1% of our citizens or, even worse (*gasp*), propose new government programs to help people- many of whom are the victims of the latest Republican spending and deregulation rampage and did NOT get money "trickled down" to them as promised by Corporate America and their representatives in Congress nor were they sufficiently assisted by the *charitable impulses" of the wealthy and/or the faithful.
Step Two: The Republicans then leverage this *outrage* over the Democratic President's "reckless" and "irresponsible" spending to rewrite history and con everybody (with the willing and eager support of the corporate media whores of course) into (again) believing that THEY and ONLY THEY are the *true* "fiscally responsible" party so that they can get back into power and hobble a Democratic President's ability to get anything meaningful accomplished and to get back into the WH themselves- where they can go back to trashing the economy for everybody but themselves and their cronies.
This seems to be the Republican's M.O. and we seem to be seeing them use the same "playbook" that they used on Clinton back in 1993-1994 on Obama now. Obama was very smart to realize this and call them out on it the other night and maybe, because he knows what they are doing, we won't end up in the same predicament again after next year like we did back in 1994 but, despite the fact that the 2010 elections are a little more than a year away, the pundits and the pollsters are already out in full force predicting a fierce "backlash" against Obama and the Democrats in next year's midterm elections for their, you guessed it, "reckless" and "irresponsible" spending habits. This, desite the fact that Buscho left Obama and the Democrats a huge economic mess to clean up, as Obama smartly noted in his speech last week, and now the Republicans and their "teabagging" friends seem to be acting as though Obama is now TOTALLY responsible for Bushco's deficits (that deficit thing that Cheney said Reagan proved don't matter) and are busy trying to kill health care reform, as well as other reforms, regulations, etc. that Obama is trying to push through Congress- measures that will help the vast majority of people in this country- based on their newfound *concern* for the deficit and "working men and women" blah, blah, blah. The "Teabaggers" are out in full force accusing Obama of being a "socialist" (as if they have any idea what they're even talking about :eyes:) and spending our country into oblivion despite the fact that, whatever Obama has "added" to our deficit, it can NOT even begin to compare to the actual amounts racked up by Bushco during the past 8 years, especially since Buscho, like Enron, purposely cooked the books to make the budget deficit look "not so bad", accomplished primarily by separating out the "war funding" from the main budget.
It REALLY honks me off to no end hearing the same Republicans whom basically "rubber stamped" Bush's disastrous policies and initiatives when they controlled the WH and Congress for 6 years and those "teabaggers", indies, and other self-proclaimed "fiscal conservatives" constantly blast Obama for his economic policies when we heard so little protest, if anything, from them about any of Bushco's substantially more reckless and irresponsible economic policies that it had NO plans whatsoever for how to pay for during the past 8 years. They now hypocritically demand all kinds of "plans" and assurances for paying for his initiatives and/or that his initiatives will be "deficit neutral". Or, even worse, basically suggest that, because the economy is so bad right now (mostly because THEY made it that way), we can't have any new programs to help people get back on their feet and that our only real path to economic restoration lies only in CUTTING vital government programs (neat little plan, eh?). It just blows my mind the unmitigated gall of them to try to pretend to be fiscally responsible when, in reality, they are the very poster children for fiscal IRRESPONSBILITY and/or its greatest enablers. :rant:
|