Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is this true? Youth unemployment is at 52%??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 04:58 PM
Original message
Is this true? Youth unemployment is at 52%??
It's from the NY Post and I am hoping this is NOT true:

The unemployment rate for young Americans has exploded to 52.2 percent -- a post-World War II high, according to the Labor Dept. -- meaning millions of Americans are staring at the likelihood that their lifetime earning potential will be diminished and, combined with the predicted slow economic recovery, their transition into productive members of society could be put on hold for an extended period of time.

And worse, without a clear economic recovery plan aimed at creating entry-level jobs, the odds of many of these young adults -- aged 16 to 24, excluding students -- getting a job and moving out of their parents' houses are long. Young workers have been among the hardest hit during the current recession -- in which a total of 9.5 million jobs have been lost.

"It's an extremely dire situation in the short run," said Heidi Shierholz, an economist with the Washington-based Economic Policy Institute. "This group won't do as well as their parents unless the jobs situation changes."

Al Angrisani, the former assistant Labor Department secretary under President Reagan, doesn't see a turnaround in the jobs picture for entry-level workers and places the blame squarely on the Obama administration and the construction of its stimulus bill.


more . . . http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/the_dead_end_kids_AnwaWNOGqsXMuIlGONNX1K
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. here are some stats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. I looked at the BLS website and could find no verification for this statement by the Post author.
Bureau of Labor Statistics notes unemployment as record levels among 16 - 24, but there is no mention of 52%.

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/youth.t02.htm


Unemployment

In July 2009, 4.4 million youth were unemployed, up by nearly 1.0
million from July 2008. The youth unemployment rate was 18.5 percent
in July 2009, the highest July rate on record for the series, which
began in 1948. As with the decline in employment, the increase in
youth unemployment in the summer of 2009 reflected a weak job market.
The July 2009 unemployment rates for young men (19.7 percent), women
(17.3 percent), whites (16.4 percent), blacks (31.2 percent), Asians
(16.3 percent), and Hispanics (21.7 percent) increased from a year
earlier. (See table 2.)


the Post author may be spinning this data as "unemployment" -


Employment

In July 2009, 19.3 million 16- to 24-year-olds were employed. This
summer's increase in youth employment was lower than last year's (1.6
million vs. 1.9 million). The employment-population ratio for youth--
the proportion of the 16- to 24-year-old civilian noninstitutional pop-
ulation that was employed--was 51.4 percent in July, down 4.6 percent-
age points from July 2008. The ratio has fallen by nearly 18 percent-
age points since its peak in July 1989. The steep decline from July
2008 to July 2009 reflects, in part, continued weak labor market condi-
tions due to the recession that began in December 2007. (See table 2.)


The employment-population ratio for young men was 52.2 percent in
July 2009, down from 57.9 percent in July 2008. The employment-pop-
ulation ratios for women (50.5 percent), whites (55.2 percent), blacks
(36.4 percent), Asians (41.3 percent), and Hispanics (46.5 percent) in
July 2009 also were lower than a year earlier.


:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The author links to another Post article
:rofl:

Thanks for the good info!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. LOL. I smell Post hit piece, complete with an Obama pic. Just in case we didn't get it.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Someone might want inform HuffPo
as they're blazing this headline right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC