Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Orly Taitz Reveals Priveleged Client Information On Her Public Blog

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 01:04 PM
Original message
Orly Taitz Reveals Priveleged Client Information On Her Public Blog
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 01:21 PM by WeDidIt
Orly Taitz' motion to be removed as Captain Rhodes' attorney was granted by Judge Land.

Note this excerpt from his ruling:

Plaintiff’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff (Doc. 20). Plaintiff apparently does not object to such withdrawal. (See Doc. 18.) Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted with the following conditions. Counsel remains subject to the jurisdiction of this Court for purposes of the Court’s show cause sanctions order and related proceedings, and Plaintiff remains subject to the jurisdiction of this Court for purposes of the Court’s previous order casting the court costs upon Plaintiff.

The Court further notes that this order shall not be construed to authorize Plaintiff’s counsel to breach any attorney-client privilege that may exist due to counsel’s representation of Plaintiff. Moreover, the Court notifies counsel that in issuing its show cause sanctions order, the Court did not rely upon the letter sent by Plaintiff purporting to discharge counsel (Doc. 18), nor does the Court intend to rely upon that document in future proceedings regarding sanctions against Plaintiff’s counsel. Whether Plaintiff expressly authorized counsel to file the motion for reconsideration is irrelevant to the Court’s determination of whether the filing was legally frivolous.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 28th day of September, 2009.


Now I won't post a link to Taitz' Trojan Tainted website, but this was in her posting regarding this ruling (privelege violation highlighted):

Judge Land in GA granted my motion to withdraw as counsel. the reason, i had to do it, since Cpt Connie Rhodes was under tremendous pressure, intimidation by the military and department of defense and she stated that she didn’t want to proceed under this pressure. Now I don’t have my hands tied behind my back, I can provide more info, now I can do more on my own behalf


Does anybody have any connections to the CA bar? She just revealed priveleged client information (and is about to violate even more attorney client privelage if her posting is to be beleived). That should get he disbarred quickly, especially since the judge specifically adminished her that the ruling does not allow her to breach that privelege.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. I say let her keep going...Rhodes is not a public figure, and Oily
will eventually say or write something pi**ing off Rhodes royally and we'll have a huge lawsuit...bankrupt the b**ch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'm betting she'll reveal a TON of priveleged information in her response
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 01:21 PM by WeDidIt
to Land's request regarding sanctions.

that'll land on her like 20 tons of bricks if she does because he specifically admonished her to NO break privelege.

In other words, I think this ruling by Land has just become a second contempt trap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oily Orly is digging her own grave


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. I say EGG HER ON!!!! Let her dig a grave for herself that's so deep
there's no possibility of her ever getting out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Did you check today? Now she is going after Judge Land on his finances.
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 02:31 PM by Stephanie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I try not to go to her site on this computer
She still is pushing out a Trojan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Ouch
How do you find that out? I have been on her site every day recently. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. McAffee site Advisor
If you use Firefox, it's suppressed, but she's still got a Trojan script there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I have a Mac and Safari
Not even sure how to scan this thing, new to Macs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Don't worry
The Trojjan scripting is specifically designed to take advantage of exploits in Windows IE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. thanks!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. if one of you still frequents her site
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 02:58 PM by Bodhi BloodWave
would you do me a favor of taking a screenshot of the section where she breaks the attorney-client privilege and send it to me.

While i may have FF, i am not taking any chances whatsoever in regards to her site

side-note: possibly also a screenshot of the area where she talks about going after Land's finances
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC