|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
thatsrightimirish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 01:16 PM Original message |
Senator Nelson's New Demands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. He's just looking for political cover. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
invictus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 03:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ineeda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. They're getting really nervous. A good sign. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nykym (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. That's swell of him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
4. I would seriously rather have a Republican in his seat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 03:11 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. No question that would be beneficial to the party over the long run- and perhaps the short as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
5. Did he just pull this figure out of his ass? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
6. Time to run some more ads in Nebraska calling him out! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
7. So Ben Nelson is saying that a majority is not a majority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
8. Deleted message |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
9. Why not say 101 votes are required? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 03:58 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Because if you had 100 Democratic Senators it would be hard to get 60 votes to end debate! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC