Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blanche Lincoln voted against Schumer's public option admendment by proxy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:21 PM
Original message
Blanche Lincoln voted against Schumer's public option admendment by proxy

Schumer Public Option Amendment Fails in Finance Committee

Brian Beutler

The Senate Finance Committee can't even endorse a modest public option like Chuck Schumer's. Citing his belief that a public option can't pass on the Senate floor "at this time," Finance chairman Max Baucus joined two Democrats and all Republicans in voting down the amendment, which failed 10 to 13.

Joining Baucus on the Democrats' side of the dais were Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) and, by proxy, Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) who wasn't present for the vote.

There will be no public option in the Finance Committee's health care bill.

Ugh!








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. The thing I don't understand....
If the Senate bill has 60 votes and no PO and the House bill has the PO, then the PO can be reconciled into the bill right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think the key to get to reconciliation is a budget issue in negotiation among the House / Senate.
I'm a little unclear on the process, but iirc, reconciliation has to be a budget related issue.

COBRA (the Consolidated Budget Reconciliation Act), back when, was enacted that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Hi, pinto. I'd like to know more about that
What can exactly be done through reconciliation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Hi mvd. Wikipedia has this, with some good references, citations, etc.
Reconciliation is a legislative process of the United States Senate intended to allow a contentious budget bill to be considered without being subject to filibuster. Reconciliation also applies in the United States House of Representatives, but since the House regularly passes rules that constrain debate and amendment, the reconciliation process represented less of a change in that body.

A reconciliation instruction (Budget Reconciliation) is a provision in a budget resolution directing one or more committees to submit legislation changing existing law in order to bring spending, revenues, or the debt-limit into conformity with the budget resolution. The instructions specify the committees to which they apply, indicate the appropriate dollar changes to be achieved, and usually provide a deadline by which the legislation is to be reported or submitted.<1>

A reconciliation bill is one containing changes in law recommended pursuant to reconciliation instructions in a budget resolution. If the instructions pertain to only one committee in a chamber, that committee reports the reconciliation bill. If the instructions pertain to more than one committee, the House Budget Committee reports an omnibus reconciliation bill, but it may not make substantive changes in the recommendations of the other committees.<2>


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconciliation_(United_States_Congress)#History


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Think that refers to changing a passed bill w/i the individual house
when the members are trying to pass a budget bill and fit everything in it.

I don't know what rules, if any, apply to bi-cameral reconciliation.

On this issue, my guess is that the overwhelming momentum would be toward a lowest common denominator final bill (w/o po). There's something fishy about all this talk of not being able to fight for it on the Senate floor b/c it doesn't have 60 votes. Since when has that been the standard? Apparently there's real resistance to hunkering in for a long fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. MSNBC has a less "wordy" overview. (Wiki's blurb reads like a legal text.)
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 04:21 PM by pinto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Thanks!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. I didn't think proxy voting was even legal
Is it legal for committee votes but not floor votes? Or did I completely imagine that proxy voting had been outlawed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Proxy in committee amendment consideration is permitted, I believe.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks, pinto!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Only in committee votes not on the floor, I've seen it done before
Markups are usually (although not always) just formalities and the real negotiation is done among staffers before the markup. Therefore sometimes Senators will decide to prioritize something else over a markup and sent a staffer in their place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Makes sense. She is a insurance industry proxy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. Of course. At least she is too ashamed to show up to do her dirt.
I think that means she is pretty wounded and caught between two masters. One that she serves and another that she must pretend to to get the chance to be of use to her real lieges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC