Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Guardian on the Nobel: Why now?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 07:55 AM
Original message
The Guardian on the Nobel: Why now?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/oct/09/barack-obama-nobel-prize-why

Which is what makes the awarding of this year's prize to a president who has been in office for a mere nine months an odd departure. It is as if the prize committee had been persuaded to give the award on the future delivery of promises.

The citation describes his "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples" in his outreach to the Muslim world and efforts to end nuclear proliferation.

Which is all very well, except that Obama is fighting wars in two Islamic states – Iraq and Afghanistan – and his efforts at international diplomacy, notwithstanding his powerful desire to achieve quick results, has thus far shown almost no progress in pushing forward peace talks in the Middle East and only very partial progress on Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. I really think we need a special forum for Guardian articles.
They are generally so full of shit that they really need a place of their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's probably the most progressive major newspaper in the world. Can't have that here!t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. We disagree. Being consistently contrary is not the definition of progressive.
The British press has always been known to favor tabloid sensationalism over journalism, and the Guardian is no exception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. The agreements about nuclear non-proliferation with the Russians etc
were mentioned several times at the ceremony. That seems to be a big deal for the Norwegians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I also support the dismantling of the sites in Poland, but you must be
nominated by Feb. 1st.

The sad thing, to me, is that I am confident that in a few years he'll actually earn this award. I just want him to close Gitmo and repudiate the assaults on rights committed by the Bush Admin.

Evidently, folks in the Middle East are pissed by this award.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. My opinion is that the award committee knows full well the moral compass of
our President. The committee knows full well that Obama will consider this award every time he has to contemplate the War.

Here are my thoughts: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8691523
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Really going to enjoy watching heads explode over this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC