ET Awful
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-30-04 08:30 PM
Original message |
| Why doesn't Kerry point out that Bush threatened to VETO the $87 bill.? |
| ButterflyBlood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-30-04 08:30 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. only 30 seconds unfortunately |
|
not enough time to explain the whole deal.
|
| ET Awful
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-30-04 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. It doesn't take long when Bush says "he voted against it" to simply reply |
|
and my opponent threatened to VETO it.
A VETO is a hell of a lot more telling than voting against one version of a bill.
|
| crickets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-30-04 08:32 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. That was my same thought |
|
He should have mentioned the funding and Bush's refusal to allow for some money to go to benefits for the Guard.
|
| welshTerrier2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-30-04 08:36 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Kerry's worst moment ... |
|
Kerry's doing great but his $87 billion answer totally stunk ... why won't he talk about bush's threatened veto ... it's such an obviously strong point for Kerry ...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
