Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's an obsure issue: Amtrak

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 11:06 PM
Original message
Here's an obsure issue: Amtrak
Edited on Fri Jan-09-04 11:16 PM by RetroLounge
Does anyone know what the candidates positions are on Amtrak?

I'm gonna go dig around on Dean's Site. Maybe the supporters of other candidates could post if they know anything.

This is just a curiousity-type issue to me, as a train/railfan, and I thought of it after seeing Clark's Money Train to NH.

Edit: I searched Dean's Site and found nothing so I sent a request for info to the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. What are the issues surrounding the rails/Amtrak?
I haven't heard anyone talking about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Mostly whether it is going to be funded to the point
where it can be made (somewhat) profitable. They authorize minimal funds, and then complain when performance is poor. Bad equipment breaks down, passengers are late, not ewnough money to upgrade equipment, passengers go elsewhere, lowers profits, etc. Viscious cycle.

Deferred maintenance has caught up and equipment and infrastructure is in bad shape.

Also route expansion vs. contraction.

High Speed rail corridors.

Privatization (bad idea).

McCain's been trying to Kill Amtrak for years. Tommy Thompson (HHS) was a huge Amtrak supporter when he was Gov of Wisconsin (one of the only things I agreed on with him).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
are_we_united_yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Amtrak's
biggest Washington ally was Senator Hollings? if I remember correctly, while Mc Cain was considered the dreadful snake by NARP (true?). All I can say is Dean never discontinued the Vermonter which went into Montpelier when he was Governor (which means almost nothing)

Glad I could help /sarcasm

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. A Clark supporter talking about Amtrak
http://environmentalists.forclark.com/story/2003/11/16/18133/424

I have a few complaints as well. There is no word yet on mass transit funding and research. Nor any word on upgrading Amtrak to a higher standard of service in more populated areas. I hope a transportation policy brief will be forthcoming to supplement this environmental brief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. A lost opportunity
Amtrak has always been underfunded. It's a vicious circle.

Highway construction gets untold billions in subsidies. And Amtrak is painted as a money pit.

Europe has a rail system that works. Why can't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tweed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Why we can't be like Europe
Europe has a great train system because the cities are so close together. That's why New England's train system is great becasue there is more demand. No one wants to take a 8 hour train ride to K.C. from Chicago when they can probably get there in 2-3 hours instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Only a couple routes on Amtrak make money.
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 12:01 AM by Feanorcurufinwe
Some Republicans want to shut down the rest.

Some places that don't make money however, like northern Montana, really rely on it. There are places where if there were no Amtrak, and you don't have a car, you're not leaving.

Maybe we can't be like Europe. But Russia has a passenger rail system. So does Australia and China and India.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. about making money
Would any airlines make money if they weren't always receiving government subsidies? It seems like only Southwest is profitable.

Repugs love to dis Amtrak funding, but have no problem giving money to the so-called private airline carriers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. That's for sure.
The airlines get bailed out if they sneeze. Big receivers of corporate welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Other countries have shown
that rail equals or exceeds air in efficiency for journeys of 600 miles or less. In Japan, it carries more than 1/3 of the traffic between the two largest metro areas of Tokyo and Osaka, holding its own against airlines and expressways.

Our govt. has treated Amtrak like the inmate of a slave labor camp: feeding it only enough to keep it alive, not enough to keep it healthy.

The anti-rail types bitch and moan about 1 billion dollar annual subsidies--for Amtrak service for the whole nation. Meanwhile, most states spend billions just for the highways within their own states.

If the Reagan admin had been smart (I know, fantasyland), they would have redirected a goodly percentage of the military budget to building both intercity rail and urban transit systems with the purpose of cutting down on the need for driving and flying. That would have been the environmentally responsible thing to do, and it would have freed us from slavery to the oil companies and OPEC--which is precisely why the Repiggies DIDN'T do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. You are correct per long distance travel but
There are other areas where the cities are also close enough to have such service. The Amtrak Cascades train is one. It's subsidized by the states of Washington and Oregon as well as the feds. This train runs between Vancouver BC and Eugene Oregon with stops in Seattle and Portland. This area's requested additional service with little cooperation from the federal government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Thank you for the link...
I figured DK would be out front on this, as it really is an environmental issue too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here is a little something
http://www.railpassenger.org/node/view/3

Most Rail-Friendly Presidential Candidate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Interesting, but not know any of the candidate position
I can't comment intelligently on the Poll.

It looks like Kerry is out on front on this. Makes sense, as the NE Corridor is the crown jewel of Amtrak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaraokeKarlton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
30. Dean did support Amtrak in Vermont
the state has been paying to keep our trains. Dean fought hard to make sure Amtrak got support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefta Dissenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. What I really like
Edited on Fri Jan-09-04 11:57 PM by Vote_Clark_In_WI
is our current administration's idea that Fed funding be cut, and each state can handle Amtrak on its own. That's SO brilliant!

So then I can get on the train in Columbus, Wisconsin and ride down to... oops - gotta get off at the ILL state line, because ILL decided it's not a priority. But then I can rent a car and drive to Indiana to pick it back up again to ride it out to... well, will Ohio fund it? Jeez, I'll NEVER make it to Union Station at this rate! :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
12. Kerry mentions it on his Agricultural issues page.
Strengthen the Rural Economy with Good Jobs at Good Wages

John Kerry understands that revitalizing rural communities requires capital, infrastructure, and technology. Kerry has boosted small business assistance available to rural entrepreneurs. He has supported rural transportation initiatives that would expand Amtrak’s serve to more of America’s rural cities and towns. Kerry has also consistently supported the Essential Air Service program, which ensures that rural airports maintain an adequate level of service. And John Kerry has a plan to replace the nearly 3 million jobs lost during the Bush Administration.
http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/agriculture/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Thank you. I agree with his views
"He has supported rural transportation initiatives that would expand Amtrak’s serve to more of America’s rural cities and towns."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. OUR CANDIDATES SHOULD TAKE THE TRAIN
The train is a nice way to travel. The seats are big and comfortable.
You don't have to wear a seat belt because there isn't any turbulence.
You won't get hassled when you have to go to the bathroom.
If you get tired of sitting in your seat, you can go to the observation car
or the lounge or the dining car, or just walk around in the train.

Trains don't fall out of the sky.
There are very few buildings they can be crashed into.

Our candidates should make a point of taking the train.
Especially Dean.
No small airplanes, ever! Please!

The campain train is a fine American tradition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. I took AmTrak from New York to California once
it's a nice way to travel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Sleeper car? Sleep in your seat? Sleep off the train?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Sleeper car first, then seat
I couldn't get the sleeper car for the whole way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. On the Edwards blog, Edwards took question on this issue. Said it was
very important and cited his support for some important upcoming piece of legislation. A little digging might find the quote.

A mobile workforce forces employers to pay top dollar for labor. Republicans don't like mobility (unless the oil industry gets a big cut of the big cost of mobility). Democrats -- especially those like Edwards who want to see the middle and working class get full value for their labor -- take this issue very seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #13
24. Giving workers transportation options:
Reducing Barriers to Work. Inner-city residents have less access to transportation and child care, making it harder for them to get and keep good jobs. Edwards will:

...

Give Workers Transportation Options. The average commute is 11.6 miles, but more than a quarter of below-poverty-level households don't have a vehicle. At a time when many jobs have moved into the suburbs, transportation is especially critical for inner-city residents. Edwards supports mass transit and innovative programs like the Federal Transit Administration's Job Access and Reverse Commute program. .

http://www.johnedwards2004.com/page.asp?id=308">Cities Rising

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
16. Dean's a fan
Governor Dean was awarded the Rail Advocate of the Year in 2000.

http://www.aot.state.vt.us/rail/Documents/On%20Track%2011_00.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #16
31. Thanks for the link
This is good to see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #16
32. Interesting, since the the first thing he ever did that was political...
...was to help tear up a rail line and put in a trail.

I took a look at this pdf and although it says twice that Dean was Rail Advocate of the Year in VT in captions to pictures, I couldn't find anything in the article which explained what that meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
19. Clark and commuter rail
Saw an article in today's Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (sorry, could not come up with a link).

No mention of Amtrak, but he was asked about Chicago's METRA rail service. He said he was not totally aware of their plans to expand into Wisconsin, but claimed he is a big supporter of commuter trains, particularly light rail.

That's the best I can come up with so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
25. Glad you brought this up!
Another four years of Bush and Amtrak will be toast. So very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
27. Our own Former Gov. Tommy was a big proponent of Amtrak
He was the chair of Amtrak's board. He seemed to be gunning for the DOT position in Bush's cabinet. I guess now we know why he didn't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
28. Rail should be seen as a strategic infrastructure
much like the national highway system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaraokeKarlton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
29. Dean went above and beyond the call of duty to keep Amtrak here
We have two Amtrak routes in Vermont...the Vermonter and the Ethan Allen. If it weren't for Dean, Vermont would not have Amtrak at all. I've ridden on the Vermonter many, many times. At least 20 times, in fact. I love that train!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC