Cocoa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-30-04 10:17 PM
Original message |
Richard Norton Smith sucks |
|
I had just gotten through talking to my father about how this was an incredibly substantive and serious debate (kudos to Jim Lehrer).
Then the female historian on PBS confirms what me and Dad both agree, that this debate stood out for that reason.
Then, back to the fool Richard Norton Smith, who LIES to us and tells us that "style trumped substance," specifically that Kerry came off as the "smartest kid in the class" and Bush came off as the professor(!) who brushes off the showoff.
First of all, Smith no doubt had that line before he even watched the debate. Second of all, his observation didn't match reality at all.
:mad:
|
Fenris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-30-04 10:19 PM
Response to Original message |
1. PROFESSOR! HAHAHAHAHAHA! |
PROGRESSIVE1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-30-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Kerry ruled the debate! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:56 AM
Response to Original message |