Dan Bartlett says re: Bush and his facial expressions...

[Auntie Bush]

"What you see is what you get!" Horrors! That means we get an Epileptic twitching Chimp for a commander in chief. :puke:

[ewagner]

1. Isn't that a rehash

of the Karen Hughes line, he (Bush*) answered him with his facial expressions..."

Actually pretty clever. Trying to define Bush*'s exasperated and wholly inappropriate facial expressions as "content" when they used Gore's expressions as a sign of weakness. Sort of innoculation against what ever the media might say.

[City Lights]

2. Hee-hee, and only yesterday, bob nofacts was telling us

that American's don't want a "funny-looking" presi:dunce:. Finally, nofacts speaks the truth. Help is on the way America! No funny-looking presi:dunce: after January 20, 2005!

[snippy]

Speaking of a "funny looking" president

[farmbo]

3. Great...the media's being snide about Bush's body language this time!

Instead of the 2000 Gore sigh...we have the 2004 Bush smirk!

Hu Raah!

[Sparkly]

4. We get the church lady?!

His lips must be bruised today from pursing them together so hard.

[kentuck]

5. We don't get much , do we??

If that is all we get.

[peacetalksforall]

6. It was obvious that Bush thinks of himself as a king and it has probably

been reinforced by his string pullers. A king dictates. A king shows displeasure when crossed... as in 'how dare you contradict me?'.

We assume that answers come in words. Not so. The body language and preceived tone accounts for more. Now, today, for the first time, the propagandist right wing media is acknowledging that about Bush.