Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Pilger on our crimes in Iraq. More reasons to vote for Kucinich?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:48 AM
Original message
John Pilger on our crimes in Iraq. More reasons to vote for Kucinich?
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 09:31 AM by Karmadillo
Below is a link to an article by John Pilger succinctly describing what the UK and the US are and what they've done in Iraq. You can decide for yourself whether Bush and Blair committed a crime against humanity, but Pilger argues "<Blair's> crime and George Bush's, is clearly defined as "supreme" in the Nuremberg judgment."

It's not like this is anything new. The dead in Indonesia and Latin America and Vietnam, if given a forum, could testify compellingly to the National Security State's thirst for blood. Not that they will be given a forum. The US media, just as it's acting to "normalize" our crimes in Iraq, acted to normalize our past crimes. And, if we do nothing, it will happen again and again.

Among the candidates running for President, no one has been more consistently forthright in opposing the war in Iraq than Dennis Kucinich. No one has been more vocal in calling for our need to withdraw from the scene of our crime and to do penance by financing the reconstruction while not partaking of the profits. No one is more vocal about the need to begin dismantling the oppressive killing machine that sucks up 50% of our discretionary spending. "We're not safe enough," some argue in opposition. With a malignant defense budget growing larger every day, we'll never be safe enough. Just as vampires rarely have a large enough supply of blood on hand for consumption, National Security States always need a few more dollars for the military.

As part of their "normalizing" efforts, the US media work hard to marginalize candidates like Kucinich. Even when it's openly done, even when Kucinich disses Ted Koppel one day and loses his "embedded" coverage the very next, even when Kucinich is portrayed as an idiot for using a pie chart to make his point during a radio debate (as if he really thought it was visible to the listening audience), even when discussions of cutting the defense budget or of providing Americans with universal health coverage is ignored for coverage of Laci Peterson and Michael Jackson and whatever else can be used to distract us from subjects of much greater importance, we have trouble believing just how complicit the media are in propping up the bloody US regimes and their allies as they go about their daily business of terrorizing the world.

No one is more likely to bring about a genuine alteration to this criminal state of affairs than Dennis Kucinich. As he notes, despite the odds, he's electable if enough people vote for him. The media would suggest otherwise, but, of course, they're always suggesting otherwise when it comes to genuine change that would discomfort our corporate masters. We don't have to believe them and, for the sake of the dead, the dying, and the doomed, we can't.

Note: The article covers a range of atrocities and the excerpts really don't do it justice. You should read the whole thing if you have the time.

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/pilger4.html

What They Don't Want You to Know
by John Pilger
January 10, 2004

<edit>

In "The Banality of Evil," Edward S. Herman wrote, "Doing terrible things in an organized and systematic way rests on 'normalization'... There is usually a division of labor in doing and rationalizing the unthinkable, with the direct brutalizing and killing done by one set of individuals... others working on improving technology (a better crematory gas, a longer burning and more adhesive Napalm, bomb fragments that penetrate flesh in hard-to-trace patterns). It is the function of the experts, and the mainstream media, to normalize the unthinkable for the general public."

<edit>

Schulz's criticism ignores the truth in Amnesty's own studies. Amnesty USA reports that the Bush administration is harboring thousands of foreign torturers, including several mass murderers. By a simple mathematical comparison of American and al-Qaeda terror, the latter is a lethal flea. In the past 50 years, the US has supported and trained state terrorists in Latin America, Africa and Asia. The toll of their victims is in the millions. Again, the documentation is in Amnesty's files. The dictator Suharto's seizure of power in Indonesia was responsible for "one of the greatest mass murders of the 20th century," according to the CIA. The US supplied arms, logistics, intelligence and assassination lists. Britain supplied warships and black propaganda to cover the trail of blood. Scholars now put Suharto's victims in 1965–66 at almost a million; in East Timor, he oversaw the death of one-third of the population: 200,000 men, women and children.

Today, the mass murderer lives in sumptuous retirement in Jakarta, his billions safe in foreign banks. Unlike Saddam Hussein, an amateur by comparison, there will be no show trial for Suharto, who remained obediently within the US terror network. (One of Suharto's most outspoken protectors and apologists in the State Department during the 1980s was Paul Wolfowitz, the current "brains" behind Bush's aggression.)

In the sublime days before 11 September 2001, when the powerful were routinely attacking and terrorizing the weak, and those dying were black or brown-skinned non-people living in faraway places such as Zaire and Guatemala, there was no terrorism. When the weak attacked the powerful, spectacularly on 9/11, there was terrorism.

This is not to say the threat from al-Qaeda and other fanatical groups is not real; what the normalizers don't want you to know is that the most pervasive danger is posed by "our" governments, whose subordinates in journalism and scholarship cast always as benign: capable of misjudgment and blunder, never of high crime. Fueled by religious fanaticism, a corrupt Americanism and rampant corporate greed, the Bush cabal is pursuing what the military historian Anatol Lieven calls "the classic modern strategy of an endangered right-wing oligarchy, which is to divert mass discontent into nationalism," inspired by fear of lethal threats. Bush's America, he warns, "has become a menace to itself and to mankind."

more...

ON EDIT: Changed title of thread and put in different excerpt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. "The banality of evil"
That's an excellent point that can't be emphasised too often: evil is 'normalised' by breaking it apart. The people who act are not the ones in charge, so emotional responsibility is diluted and diffused. Both the one giving the orders and the one carrying them out can point to the other and say 'it's his fault, not mine'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Here's a link to Herman's article on evil. More on normalization.
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Herman%20/BanalityEvil_Herman.html

<edit>

Doing terrible things in an organized and systematic way rests on "normalization." This is the process whereby ugly, degrading, murderous, and unspeakable acts become routine and are accepted as "the way things are done." There is usually a division of labor in doing and rationalizing the unthinkable, with the direct brutalizing and killing done by one set of individuals; others keeping the machinery of death (sanitation, food supply) in order; still others producing the implements of killing, or working on improving technology (a better crematory gas, a longer burning and more adhesive napalm, bomb fragments that penetrate flesh in hard-to-trace patterns). It is the function of defense intellectuals and other experts, and the mainstream media, to normalize the unthinkable for the general public. The late Herman Kahn spent a lifetime making nuclear war palatable (On Thermonuclear War, Thinking About the Unthinkable), and this strangelovian phoney got very good press. ~

In an excellent article entitled "Normalizing the unthinkable," in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists of March 1984, Lisa Peattie described how in the Nazi death camps work was "normalized" for the long-term prisoners as well as regular personnel: "

rison plumbers laid the water pipe in the crematorium and prison electricians wired the fences. The camp managers maintained standards and orderly process. The cobblestones which paved the crematorium yard at Auschwitz had to be perfectly scrubbed." Peattie focused on the parallel between routinization in the death camps and the preparations for nuclear war, where the "unthinkable" is organized and prepared for in a division of labor participated in by people at many levels. Distance from execution helps render responsibility hazy. "Adolph Eichmann was a thoroughly responsible person, according to his understanding of responsibility. For him, it was clear that the heads of state set policy. His role was to implement, and fortunately, he felt, it was never part of his job actually to have to kill anyone."

<edit>

Mainstream history has also successfully put Black slavery and oppression in a tolerable light. A powerful article by the late Nathan I. Huggins, "The Deforming Mirror of Truth: Slavery and the Master Narrative of American History, " in the Winter 1991 issue of the Radical History Review, shows well how the "master narrative" in historiography has normalized Black slavery and post-1865 racism. Slavery was a "tragic error" (like the Vietnam War), rather than a rational and institutional choice; it has been marginalized as an aside or tangent, rather than recognized as a central and integral feature of U.S. history; and it has been portrayed as an error in process of rectification in a progressive evolution, rather than a terrible permanent scar that helps explain the Southern Strategy, the current attack on affirmative action, and the enlarging Black ghetto disaster of today.

<edit>

Normalization of the unthinkable comes easily when money, status, power, and jobs are at stake. Companies and workers can always be found to manufacture poison gases, napalm, or instruments of torture, and intellectuals will be dredged up to justify their production and use. The rationalizations are hoary with age: government knows best, ours is a strictly defensive effort, or, if it wasn't me somebody else would do it. There is also the retreat to ignorance, real, cultivated, or feigned. Consumer ignorance of process is important. Dr. Samuel Johnson avowed that we would kill a cow rather than forego eating meat, but visits to slaughterhouses have made quite a few people into vegetarians. A cover story of Newsweek some years ago, illustrating U.S. consumption of meat by showing livestock walking into a human mouth, elicited many protests-people don't like to be reminded that steaks are obtained from slaughtered animals; they like to imagine that they are manufactured in factories, possibly out of biomass.

more...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. normalized evil...
The Pentagon Budget, continued illegal occupation...

These are things that must be addressed.

Kucinich wants to do what is right!

TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. "capable of misjudgment and blunder, never of high crime."
How true, the media always plays everything off as 'oops' or 'not the intended result'.

They do not ask if possible that our leaders are committing crimes.

TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not only do they not ask, their silence or misdirection or normalization
make the commission of such crimes possible. We get Monica Lewinsky 24/7, but missing WMD's are hardly worth a mention.

http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=17528

Media AWOL on WMD
By Bill Berkowitz, TomPaine.com
January 9, 2004


<edit>

But that was then, and this is nearly 10 months after the U.S. invasion, and the media has basically bailed on the important issue beyond the fact of missing WMD: Who was responsible for the lies? Are they too busy dealing with weightier matters, such as the Michael Jackson or Kobe Bryant sex cases? Are they overwhelmed by a bouillabaisse of homeland security stories dished out by Secretary Ridge's Department of Homeland Security? Or is it possible that "Bush Lied about Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction" is a headline that would be too darned hot to handle?

Danny Schecter, the executive editor of MediaChannel.org, points out in his new book "Embedded: Weapons of Mass Deception" that, "The TV networks...considered their non-stop around-the-clock coverage their finest hour, pointing to the use of embedded journalists and new technologies that permitted viewers to see a war up close for the first time." Will they devote even a fraction of those resources to uncovering the genesis of Bush's WMD lies?

Will The Media Pay Attention Now?

John Dean speculated that not finding Iraq's weapons of mass destruction could be a scandal of greater proportion than Watergate: "...if Bush has taken Congress and the nation into war based on bogus information, he is cooked. Manipulation or deliberate misuse of national security intelligence data, if proven, could be 'a high crime' under the Constitution's impeachment clause. It would also be a violation of federal criminal law, including the broad federal anti-conspiracy statute, which renders it a felony 'to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose.'"

If there's any scandal brewing at this point, it's that the mainstream media has not held the Bush administration accountable for its misinformation and disinformation campaign about Iraq's WMD stockpiles.

Upon the publication of the Carnegie Endowment's report, Joseph Cirincione called for the creation of an independent commission to further investigate the study's findings. In December, Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kansas), chairman of the Senate intelligence committee, told CBS' "Face the Nation" that there might be public hearings on the Bush administration's weapons of mass destruction claims, beginning sometime in February. With the Post's story and the Carnegie report under their belts, the committee should have a lot more to work with. Will the mainstream media come along for the ride?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Am I allowed to pound my fist on the table?
This is the type of thing that people do not realize. Not only are the media complicit with the criminal administration. They also are complicit in predetermination our electoral process. Yes and I do include the primaries. If that hasn't been evident in the treatment of the biggest threat to the media/BFEE's system of dominance.


TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I wish I could disagree with you,
but you're absolutely right. Kucinich could be 6'2'' and look like Robert Redford and we'd still hear more about his eating habits than his plans for ending corporate ownership of the US government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick for obvious reasons
Americans DO NOT want an empire. They DO NOT need an empire. I am firmly convinced that if more people knew about the atrocities our government commits overseas that our foreign policy would be vastly different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Good point. Illustrates the media are not just passive
malefactors, but active ones. They conspire in making the United States into something that would never have popular support if the truth (well, whatever approximation humans can come up with) were widely known.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. And I think it all could go right back to Chomsky
Manufacturing Consent.

That is exactly what is happening. It's really hard to see because it not only misleads but covers itself up at the same time.


TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Excellent book
If this were mandatory high school reading, we might have a different country. Here's a link to Amazon for those who haven't read it yet.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-form/002-5836380-8728028

Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com

An absolutely brilliant analysis of the ways in which individuals and organizations of the media are influenced to shape the social agendas of knowledge and, therefore, belief. Contrary to the popular conception of members of the press as hard-bitten realists doggedly pursuing unpopular truths, Herman and Chomsky prove conclusively that the free-market economics model of media leads inevitably to normative and narrow reporting. Whether or not you've seen the eye-opening movie, buy this book, and you will be a far more knowledgeable person and much less prone to having your beliefs manipulated as easily as the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kick
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. Ok
A kick to keep it on the front page until I get home from work, so I can read it.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC