|
Edited on Fri Oct-01-04 11:48 PM by indyjones1938
Welcome to DU. Hope you enjoy your short stay! :hi:
By the way, care to tell me which of John Edwards' cases were "frivolous?"
Maybe the one where he defended a five year-old girl who was disemboweled (had her internal organs sucked out) by a defective swimming pool? Nope, don't think so.
Or maybe the one where doctors botched a c-section and gave a young baby quadriplegia and cerebral palsy? Nah, doesn't sound frivolous to me?
Perhaps the case where a man had an 850 lb box dropped on him by a transport service, leaving him paralyzed for life? Or maybe the cases where he represented families of people killed by tractor trailers as a result of improper company policies? Do those sound frivolous to you?
See, here's the difference between Democrats and Republicans:
Republicans believe the value of a human life can be put into dollar figures ($250,000 maximum). If a multibillion dollar corporation or millionnaire physician knowingly and repeatedly commits wrongdoing that results in a human being being killed or maimed, Republicans feel that they should not have to be held responsible for their actions. Under the Republican "tort reform" plan, companies with defective products will weigh the potential number of human deaths against the potential cost of recalling the unsafe products. If a company feels that a defective product might kill only three or so people, they'll estimate their maximum loss at $750,000, much lower than the millions they would have to spend to recall the dangerous product. That company is going save a few million dollars by keeping their product on the market instead of recalling it. And if a few people die because if it, they'll say "so what?" Under the Republican plan, the number of people killed and maimed each year by doctors and defective products would rapidly increase because there is no standard of accountability.
Democrats believe that you can't put a maximum price on the value of a human life. If there are no standards of accountability in the medical and corporate world, the rights of the patient and the consumer go down the drain. The simple fact is, "tort reform" doesn't begin in the courtroom: it begins in the operating room and the board room. If companies and physicians willingly make decisions that result in people being killed and maimed, they should be held accountable for their actions. It is as simple as that. Did you know, riggins44, that 400,000+ people in the United States die every year as a result of physicians' negligence? That's six times as many people as we lost in the entire 10-year Vietnam War, and four hundred times as many as we have lost in Iraq.
And the Republican talking point about trial lawyers "raising insurance premiums" is spin at best, and an outright lie at worst.
The truth is, lawyers don't raise insurance premiums. Insurance companies and HMOs do. The health care crisis in this country exists because insurance companies are out of control and so closely tied to the stock market and the corporate world.
If you actually took the time to look into the statistics instead of just reading the RNC talking points you would realize three things:
(a) In the early 1990s, while insurance premiums were flat and FALLING, medical malpractice suits were actually on the INCREASE.
(b) The average per annum rate of insurance premium increases is over DOUBLE the rate of malpractice judgement increases.
(c) The total amount of money awarded in malpractice suits has FALLEN in recent years, while insurance rates have RISEN.
If you've got a problem with insurance premiums, complain to the guy at 1600 Pennsylania Avenue and his GOP cronies in Congress. They are, after all, the ones who are bankrolling the drug companies and HMOs, while refusing to take measures that would lower the price of prescription drugs and insurance premiums. George W. Bush had the chance to allow these companies to import drugs from Canada so as to lower drug prices here in the states, but he refused. The blame rests with him alone
|