Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Didnt Chimpy demand the first debate be about Iraq and national security?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
joanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:16 PM
Original message
Didnt Chimpy demand the first debate be about Iraq and national security?
Supposedly his "strong points".

I'm sure Rove and his spinners thought * would win this first debate decisively. They needed to think that because * cant talk about the economy, jobs, health care and other matters important to Americans.

My point is... if he did so dismally in the area that is considered his "strongest" how much lower can he go? :) :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
complain jane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can hardly wait to see!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. the bush monkey's strong lyin' points..
cause the people can't check up as easily.. like on what the economy is doin' to them.

Except for the poor soldiers who haven't drunk the KoolAid..they know what's goin' on in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. chimpy will work religion more into the next two debates
it seems like a lot of the fundamentalist-freepers were upset that chimpy didn't talk about invading Iraq as a step toward the Rapture, etc. chimpy was only able to touch on that briefly in his closing statement - the stuff about the city on the hill blah blah.

shrimpy-chimpy will probably get some mileage out of bringing more overt religion into the next two debates. I don't know if this will help with undecideds - kind of doubt it actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:32 PM
Original message
By doing that..............
he preaches to his choir of Fundies, but I think it'll turn off many voters who are fence sitting. Many people aren't that comfortable with a religowhacko with his finger on the button. It would be a big mistake on Bush's part IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. I heard he did . . .
Edited on Fri Oct-01-04 11:28 PM by beaconess
It seems like Kerry's team gave Bush a lot what he wanted, letting the Bush team think they'd gotten something but knowing full well that it wouldn't make any difference - that the Commander could take him down under any circumstances.

So much for the "Vernon Jordan is a wimp" crap. Looks like ole' Vernon, as usual, knew exactly what he was doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, I believe they did. And ...
... I expect they did this thinking:

(1) More people would watch the first debate, than the followups.

(2) A win in the first debate could have been a knockout punch to Kerry.

Bummer for Bushie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Be Careful What You Wish For....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush on the campaign trail says the unemployment rate
now is lower than in the 1990s, averaging in his father's recession to bring down Clinton's good record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. I concur with your diagnosis completely
Edited on Fri Oct-01-04 11:42 PM by rocknation
I've read a couple of stories which said that the Bush camp wanted to talk foreign policy first. I believe they did so because that's where they percieved Kerry as being most vulnerable. What they didn't factor in is that foreign policy is also where Bush is least credible. All Kerry had to do was call him on it, and the debate turned into a cakewalk for him.

:headbang:
rocknation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC