serryjw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-01-04 11:58 PM
Original message |
Pat Buchanan quote from McLaughlin Group on PBS |
|
Edited on Sat Oct-02-04 12:02 AM by serryjw
" John Kerry gave the best performance of his life"
Hell, I agree with Pat....FINALLY!
-------You don't get Colorado State of Mind
The best quote of the night there was because we invaded Iraq no one attached us here!.Do poeple REALLY believe this Bushit?
|
skylarmae
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-02-04 12:01 AM
Response to Original message |
1. If Pat holds true to form - beware |
|
He's Repuq all the way. Believe it. He may have problems with Georgie Porgie, but repuq big time.
|
serryjw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-02-04 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. PAT is a RETHUG......... |
|
but this administration are neocons. He has been very critical of the war in Iraq and has not supported much that they have done in the last 4 years
|
Tamyrlin79
(944 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-02-04 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. yes... Pat is clearly his own wing of the party. |
Robert Oak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-02-04 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
11. absolutely neocons are not conservatives |
|
The conservative republicans are royally pissed...
Joe Scarborough even wrote a book on it (MSNBC pundit)
the budget deficit, the trade deficit and yes the mismanagement on Iraq.
I honestly think Kerry could work with them for on many economic policy issues they are just plain right...
(although socially they make me want to puke).
|
kokomo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-02-04 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. His sister, Bay, was singing praises unto Bush all over the tube today. |
kwolf68
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-02-04 12:04 AM
Response to Original message |
|
He is one of the partisans who at least tries to be objective. I can't stomach most of his politics, but I could deal if he was the total representation of the Republican Party.
|
liberalmuse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-02-04 12:05 AM
Response to Original message |
|
after the 1992 RNC convention, that Pat Buchanan would end up being one of the sanest Republicans/conservatives on the planet a little over 10 years later? It boggles the mind.
|
serryjw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-02-04 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Say it's not so....... |
|
I have agreed with much of what PB has said in the last few years concerning this administration. We may not agree on fiscal policies but I do think we have an immigration problem. I hate this war and we should never have gone in.....we agree.........SCARY!
|
kokomo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-02-04 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
13. except for racism, Buchanan best represents the party of Lincoln. |
Politicub
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-02-04 12:06 AM
Response to Original message |
5. I don't know if I trust Pat or not |
|
But I do enjoy when he's a guest on the talking head shows. At least he's articulate.
|
karlrschneider
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-02-04 12:09 AM
Response to Original message |
7. The thing about Pat B. is that although he's an asshole, he's an honest |
|
asshole. I despise his positions, but he stays pretty damn consistent with them.
|
Big Al from WI
(130 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-02-04 12:09 AM
Response to Original message |
8. He might be voting for Badnarik or Peroutka |
|
Obviously doesn't like Kerry, but doesn't like Bush either.
|
Tamyrlin79
(944 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-02-04 12:20 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Bush: So extreme he makes Pat Buchannon seem sane in comparison. |
demwing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-02-04 12:41 AM
Response to Original message |
14. The Enemy of My Enemy |
|
is close enough to a friend to deal with it until we get Herr Bush out of our Whitehouse.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:26 PM
Response to Original message |