Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dem Pollster: sees Dean losing to Bush 53 percent to 39 percent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:10 PM
Original message
Dem Pollster: sees Dean losing to Bush 53 percent to 39 percent
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/whispers/whisphome.htm

His recommendation: Woo "persuadables," or independent voters looking for move vision and less antiwar talk.

Bush win, place, show
Howard Dean may be racing to the front of the pack campaigning to face President Bush in the fall, but winning the nomination could be the high point for the ex-Vermont governor, according to Democratic pollster Peter Hart. His latest calculations suggest Dean losing to Bush 53 percent to 39 percent. Worse, Bush right now is unusually strong in virtually all critical categories. He beats Dean by 22 percent among male voters, 3 percent among women voters, and 10 percent among independents. What's more, Bush wins all age groups. He bests Dean by 3 percent among voters 35 and younger and by 15 percent with those over 35. And, adds Hart, no other candidate would do any better. Dean, he says, "is doing as well as anybody."


However, one factor that Bedard does not take into account: Clark is still a very unknown quantity to voters. The more the public sees of him and gets to know him - the higher his numbers climb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Clowning and the clowns who clown
When will the left stop being suckers, dupes for the media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Cognitive Dissonance alert..... This is a Dem POLLSTER not the media
keep telling yourself that though.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The DEM POLLSTER sent you an email?
This story and all pontifications therein are from THE MEDIA. They are using this DEM POLLSTER as the SOURCE of their info, the backup for their assertions.

I tell myself the truth. But then, I don't bow to the will of the clowns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Huh????
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. What's not to understand?
You posted an article from usnews. That's not the media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. GOP pollster sees Bush losing to Dean
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Hope they're right. That was back in Sept pre-gaffes though.
We cannot afford to hide our heads in the sand. Never get cocky....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dean is the only candidate everyone HEARS about from the media.
If Kerry had Dean's media time he'd be killing Bush in a matchup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Yep. So would Clark, Edwards and even Gephardt
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Quite likely.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. if Kerry got the media Dean's media coverage, Kerry would have
... had to drop out by now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why do we spend a fortune on a nominating process...
...when there are so many people who will take the job off our hands for free?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is Democrats in the *present*, of course.
Given Gore was down by similar margins last election, Democrats don't have much to worry about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. This should not be a Dean headline: nobody beats Bush...
And, adds Hart, no other candidate would do any better. Dean, he says, "is doing as well as anybody."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. But Dean is the only one who has gotten coverage. The rest haven't...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Dean's got coverage allright...unflattering coverage...
Clark's flying under the radar screen for now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. They've been kissing Dean's butt for a year until now. Others: no coverage
Getting NO coverage is even worse than negative coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreegone Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. Time for a:
Chicken Liberal Alert......the sky is falling...

Alert, Alert

adds Hart, no other candidate would do any better. Dean, he says, "is doing as well as anybody."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. Bush team considers Dean formidable GOP admit they underestimated Dean
How Dean Could Win . . .

By William Kristol
Tuesday, December 9, 2003; Page A27


Thus, on domestic policy, Dean will characterize Bush as the deficit-expanding, Social Security-threatening, Constitution-amending (on marriage) radical, while positioning himself as a hard-headed, budget-balancing, federalism-respecting compassionate moderate. And on foreign and defense policy, look for Dean to say that he was and remains anti-Iraq war (as, he will point out, were lots of traditional centrist foreign policy types). But Dean will emphasize that he has never ruled out the use of force (including unilaterally). Indeed, he will say, he believes in military strength so strongly that he thinks we should increase the size of the Army by a division or two. It's Bush, Dean will point out, who's trying to deal with the new, post-Sept. 11 world with a pre-Sept. 11 military.

The writer is editor of the Weekly Standard.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A47806-2003Dec8
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=103&topic_id=24883

TO: Moore Information Clients & Friends

FROM: Hans Kaiser & Bob Moore

RE: Election 2004: Why Dean Can Win, September 2003

A recent article by David Brooks left readers with the distinct impression that Republican pollsters are all of the opinion that Howard Dean cannot possibly beat George Bush. We regret that he didn’t check with us first, as it is our belief that Dean has the potential to be a formidable candidate who could give the President a very difficult race.

The conventional wisdom that has some Republicans giddy about a potential Dean candidacy is not only misguided, it is counterproductive. Writing off a candidate like Dean by selectively sorting statistical gobble-de-gook and mixing it into a broth of “empirical” sociological evidence ignores the political realities of our time.

The difference between Howard Dean and the rest of the Democrat candidates is that Dean comes across as a true believer to the base but he will not appear threatening to folks in the middle. More than any other candidate in the field, he will be able to present himself as one who cares about people (doctor), who balances budgets (governor), and who appears well grounded while looking presidential. To be sure, he doesn’t look that way to the GOP base, but that has no bearing on the election, because they will never vote for him anyway. He can appeal to the middle and Republicans can ignore his candidacy at our peril. We are whistling past the graveyard if we think Howard Dean will be a pushover.

Howard Dean’s appeal is closer to Ronald Reagan’s than any other Democrat running today. Granted, that’s not saying much with this field, but there are similarities here. The Democrat party used to chuckle about Reagan and his gaffes which they believed would marginalize him to the far right dustbin of history. But when his opponents tried to attack him for some of his more outlandish statements, the folks in the middle simply ignored them. Voters in the middle looked to the bigger picture where they saw a man of conviction who cared about them and had solutions for their problems. Howard Dean has the potential to offer a similar type candidacy.

http://www.moore-info.com/Poll_Updates/2004%20Election%20%20Why%20Dean%20can%20win%20Sept%2003.htm
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/david_reinhard/index.ssf?/base/editorial/106829671744920.xml
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=709103

Bush team considers Dean formidable Republicans admit they underestimated Dem candidate

By Judy Keen
USA TODAY


WASHINGTON -- Republican Party officials and political advisers to President Bush admit that they underestimated Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean and say they now consider him a formidable potential adversary.

Some Bush allies say he reminds them of another insurgent candidate who once bedeviled Bush: Arizona Sen. John McCain. His wins in Republican primary elections in New Hampshire and Michigan rattled Bush's 2000 campaign.

''There is something going on there, and I tell you, if we don't pay attention . . . we're making a big mistake,'' says Tom Rath, a Republican strategist and Bush adviser in New Hampshire.

http://www.usatoday.com/usatonline/20030908/5477666s.htm
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=103020
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. I won't believe any presidential polls until this campaign gets on
the national level. I live in Illinois and we hear very little about the candidates. When this campaign gets on the national level, then I will believe the national poll.

Also, there are some pretty damning stories beginning to surface about the administration. Wait until they gain some steam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
19. Actually, this isn't just about Dean v. Bush
The truth is that none of the Democratic candidates are particularly well-known to the public at large. That includes Dean as well as Clark. The great danger of that is that it will allow a given candidate's opponents, either the other Democratic candidate or Mr. Bush and his people, to define him negatively.

Consequently, any Democrats would lose to Bush by about 53 to 39 at this time. This information says nothing about one candidate's relative chances to defeat Bush as opposed to another's.

There needs to be less infighting by potential nominees and more talk about the necessity of defeating Bush. Each candidate needs to do more to define himself. Each candidate may need a little space to do that. Right now, each candidate is doing his damnedest to prevent every other candidate from getting that space.

Perhaps this will improve after the field thins out following the early primaries. Meanwhile, Karl Rove must be loving it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. New poll: Clark doing best vs. Bush. Now that voters getting to know him
AP-Ipsos poll Jan. 5-7: Bush Wins; Clark Best Head to Head


Edited on Fri Jan-09-04 11:21 AM by Jerseycoa
Wesley Clark by 49-42 (by 7)
Howard Dean by 54-39 (by 15)
John Kerry by 54-37 (by 17)
Dick Gephardt by 56-35 (by 21)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. Strategically forgotten part of the article.
And, adds Hart, no other candidate would do any better. Dean, he says, "is doing as well as anybody."

Why did you leave this part out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. I don't think this headline is fair.
It does not accurately reflect the content of the post, which includes this gem:

And, adds Hart, no other candidate would do any better. Dean, he says, "is doing as well as anybody."

I'm locking.

Skinner
DU Admin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC