National Review or the Weekly Standard declared Kerry the winner

[Bush was AWOL]

One of these rags declared Kerry the winner. I thought so anyway. Does anyone have the article they wrote admitting Kerry kicked ass?

[Oddman]

1. Buckley from the National Review thought Kerry won

http://www.nationalreview.com/buckley/buckley200410011418.asp


George Bush our MASTERdeBATER

What on earth is my hand doing? Bad hand - bad!

[Bush was AWOL]

3. Thanks!

[nostalgicaboutmyfutr]

2. from National Review

this one is rich:

http://www.nationalreview.com/nordlinger/nordlinger200410010114.asp

Don’t Shoot the Messenger . . .. . . ’cause this assessment’s grim.

Don't shoot the messenger.


I thought Kerry did very, very well; and I thought Bush did poorly — much worse than he is capable of doing. Listen: If I were just a normal guy — not Joe Political Junkie — I would vote for Kerry. On the basis of that debate, I would. If I were just a normal, fairly conservative, war-supporting guy: I would vote for Kerry. On the basis of that debate.

And I promise you that no one wants this president reelected more than I. I think that he may want it less.

Let me phrase one more time what I wish to say: If I didn't know anything — were a political naïf, being introduced to the two candidates for the first time — I would vote for Kerry. Based on that infernal debate.

[Bush was AWOL]

4. Thanks as welll

agree with him about the debate, but disagree with him strongly towards the end.

What a great day today was. Even Limbaughs callers were in meltdown when I was listening.