http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-poll11jan11,1,3764349.story?coll=la-home-headlinesThis poll is GREAT NEWS for DEAN!!! And it was taken BEFORE the Harkin endorsement!
But note how the LA Times spins their own numbers:
Dean Ahead But Iowa Is Up For Grabs
Although he topped the Democratic field with 30% support, many surveyed say they could change their minds ahead of the caucus.
WASHINGTON — Howard Dean has established a narrow advantage in the Iowa caucuses by amassing a solid lead among upscale voters while cutting into Missouri Rep. Dick Gephardt's support among blue-collar and union families, a new Times Poll found.
Barely a week before the Jan. 19 voting, Dean led Gephardt 30% to 23%, a difference just within the poll's margin of error. Massachusetts Sen. John F. Kerry, with 18%, remained within reach of Gephardt, while North Carolina Sen. John Edwards attracted 11%.
The survey also showed likely caucus voters were surprisingly fluid in their commitments to the candidates, even after months of intensive campaigning. About 1 in 11 said they remain undecided in the race. More significantly, nearly 40% who express a preference say they could still switch before the caucuses.Consider:
1) The voters who currently support Dean are almost certainly far less "fluid" than those who support other candidates.
2) The poll was taken before the Harkin announcement.
3) Gore is actively campaigning for Dean in Iowa.
So why isn't this article trumpeting this poll as the augur of a huge Dean victory in Iowa? Can anybody take a stab at explaining the obvious anti-Dean spin on this obviously pro-Dean news?