Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CONDDOOLLEEZZAA!!!! Liar, liar, pants on fire!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 03:13 PM
Original message
CONDDOOLLEEZZAA!!!! Liar, liar, pants on fire!!!
Sunday New York Times: "Skewed Intelligence Data in March to War in Iraq"

In 2002, at a crucial juncture on the path to war, senior members of the Bush administration gave a series of speeches and interviews in which they asserted that Saddam Hussein was rebuilding his nuclear weapons program.

In a speech to veterans that August, Vice President Dick Cheney said Mr. Hussein could have an atomic bomb "fairly soon." The next month, Mr. Cheney told a group of Wyoming Republicans the United States had "irrefutable evidence" - thousands of tubes made of high-strength aluminum, tubes that the Bush administration said were destined for clandestine Iraqi uranium centrifuges, before some were seized at the behest of the United States.

The tubes quickly became a critical exhibit in the administration's brief against Iraq. As the only physical evidence the United States could brandish of Mr. Hussein's revived nuclear ambitions, they gave credibility to the apocalyptic imagery invoked by President Bush and his advisers. The tubes were "only really suited for nuclear weapons programs," Condoleezza Rice, the president's national security adviser, asserted on CNN on Sept. 8, 2002. "We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."

Before Ms. Rice made those remarks, though, she was aware that the government's foremost nuclear experts had concluded that the tubes were most likely not for nuclear weapons at all, an examination by The New York Times has found. Months before, her staff had been told that these experts, at the Energy Department, believed the tubes were probably intended for small artillery rockets.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/03/international/middleeast/03tube.html?oref=login&hp&oref=regi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. They call this news? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. How timely.....Now that we have invaded and have a catastrophe
on our hands, NOW they report this.....something that's been out there for fucking years.

Disgusting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. glad to see it in print..............n/t
But so many lies are already documented, it's just one more thing.

Question: How many straws does it take to break a camel's back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Lordy, the article is like 18 pages long!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. TWENTY on my printer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I have lost count do you think Alan Greenspan could help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. There are many different ways to build a nuclear bomb.
Those tubes might not be used in the middle of a bomb
but they could be used on the outside as the exhaust
system for the bomb. I'm sure there are a lot of things Ms
Rice knows about nuclear bombs and so forth that you never
dreamed of. Let's all not be so hasty in jumping to conclusions
about what goes into a nuclear bomb or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yes. They might have been for the muffler or maybe for the suspension
They could have been welded together to make a stand to put the bomb on while they were working on it. They could have used the tubes for a frame for the building where they put it together. Like any number of things, right Condi?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. "Stop asking me so many questions!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Exactly. They might be Iraqies
but that doesn't mean they can't have
a Little American ingenuityousness. When you're
building a home-made nuclear bomb, you use whatever's
handy--beeswax, peanut shells, bobby pins, Magic Orange,
tubes, whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. It's not Ms. Rice, it's Dr. Rice...
And while she may know a few things about nukes that I don't (or not) I'm fairly certain that she doesn't know more than the people tasked to investigate the claims of nuclear proliferation.

Remember: this is the same Dr. Rice that claimed that no-one thought of flying planes into buildings before September 11th, 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. She should lose her license
Or let Edwards sue her for malpractice and malfeasance! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Yes, they are always so careful to say DOCTOR Rice....
Yet Senator Kerry is "My opponent" to Bush. Disgraceful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Experts at the Energy Department beg to differ with you and Condi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
15. Will TV news give this story the attention it deserves???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC