Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Why Media Overestimating Bush lead"-- especially interesting considering

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemMother Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 07:36 PM
Original message
"Why Media Overestimating Bush lead"-- especially interesting considering
recent Newsweek poll.

from donkey rising (written before Newsweek poll released)

"Leading Pollster Guy Molyneux Explains Why the Media Is Overestimating Bush's Lead

Guy Molyneux is a highly respected analyst and pollster who serves as a Senior Vice President and Partner of Peter Hart Research Associates. In an article now available on the American Prospect's website he presents an extremely important analysis of why the media is overestimating Bush's lead and underestimating how close the race actually is.

Almost all poll reporting focuses on the “spread,” that is, the difference in the percentage supporting Bush and John Kerry...However, in incumbent elections, the incumbent’s percentage of the vote is a far better indicator of the state of the race than the spread. In fact, the percentage of the vote an incumbent president receives in surveys is an extraordinarily accurate predictor of the percentage he will receive on election day -- even though the survey results also include a pool of undecided voters.

Think of it this way: The percentage that Bush receives in polls represents his ceiling of support; he may get a little less, but won’t get more. In contrast, Kerry’s percentage represents his floor, and he will almost certainly do better on election day."

http://emergingdemocraticmajorityweblog.com/donkeyrising/index.php



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I like that analogy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonbeam_Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uh hey DUers
you HAVE to read this article. Go to the link given in the OP, then from there, go to the complete American Prospect article.

OMG, that gives me the willies!!!! Whooo!!! And it makes COMPLETE sense. He bases it on hard facts.

Read it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't this theory also what TruthisAll
is using in her poll statistical analysis she posts here? Statistically this theory sounds right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. interesting, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonbeam_Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Basically what this says is
if bush is polling at below 50%, he is toast.

Great article, I've already posted it on another site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think most here agree totally with that assessment.
If Bush* is polling less than 48%, Kerry will win the election. It doesn't matter what the spread is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonbeam_Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yep
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. And something about the battleground states
from Molyneux's American Prospect article
http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=8694

snip>

You may also have heard that Bush is surging ahead in the crucial “battleground states” that will determine the Electoral College outcome. However, polls in these states actually reveal an even more precarious position for the president. Taken together, Bush receives a bit less support in these critical states than in the nation overall. In the latest NBC/WSJ poll, Bush receives 49 percent support nationally but only 47 percent in the battleground states, a typical finding. (Bush and Al Gore split the vote in these states evenly, 48 percent to 48 percent.)

More importantly, if we take an average of recent published polls of registered voters in individual states, Bush falls short of the 49-percent benchmark in nearly every one, including Ohio (47 percent), Florida (47 percent), and Pennsylvania (46 percent). Wisconsin (51 percent) is the only crucial battleground state in which Bush appears to have a fairly solid lead. Bush even fails to clear the 49-percent bar in such 2000 Bush states as West Virginia (47 percent), Missouri (49 percent), and Arkansas (48 percent). This year, it is quite possible that it will be Bush who ends up wishing we had scrapped the Electoral College in favor of a straight popular vote.

snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Judy Woodruff, read it and weep.
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wow -- Wow -- Wow
Very eloquent with a great command of the facts. I am heartened all over again.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. Sunday morning kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. kick again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indef Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
13. last thing we need
is for neocons to think that it's a close election. I'd be happy if they think it'll be a landslide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC