Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The important subtext during the debate was

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:11 AM
Original message
The important subtext during the debate was
1. Kerry nodded and wrote 'answering points' while * was speaking. This came off as a positive, constructive approach to the function of the debate: to accept the other person's precepts as though they have merit in and of themselves and then counter them with precepts better founded in logic and fact.

2. Kerry's manner was positive at all times - a slight smile during negativity works. Just ask any car salesman when your spouse starts getting in the way of the close. They never get defensive, they smile, nod, and counter or assist in a resolution.

3. Kerry just had to drop his ending "g's". Nothin', buildin', hopin', are examples of how he appeared 'folksy' without fraudulence. I betcha Edwards told him to do this. Edwards, a brilliant tactician, debater, and rhetoritician doesn't need to speak like he's from Appalachia but he does. It works with a Southern accent, you can fake it a bit - which Kerry did brilliantly - when you're from the North.

4. Kerry repeated the phrase "I can do Better" many times. That gets into the brains of individuals who are looking for who's going to do better. Brilliant move. Bush of course can't say that becasue he's saddled with a form of the incumbency. What Bush should say is that since he was never really elected President, that he's the challenger and that the Gore Administraton has really made a mess of things, or as he would say "made a mess o'things."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. What JK was doing is called "flowing the debate."
In the real world, debates are won by taking notes while your opponent speaks (this is called flowing) and refuting each statement when it's your turn to speak.

JK did exactly that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Gee, Bush could do that, too ...
Edited on Sun Oct-03-04 07:17 AM by A-Schwarzenegger
if he could write & read...
At least he could pretend...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indef Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. not just about Kerry
Most of Kerry's strategy has to be about who he is, but he also has to continue painting Bush as one who is quick to emotion and off the cuff - and who really wants a C-in-C that has those traits? Kerry was able to do some of that in round 1, and he has to press this for the rest of the campaign, that Bush's judgement is influenced by a short temper and faulty stubborness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpaceCatMeetsMars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. I have noticed that Kerry has also improved a lot in bringing to
his speeches a more conversational, down-to-earth tone rather than the senatorial-sounding tone he had. He is working hard at everything and Bush is not. They must have spent hours trying to get Bush to stop making those bitchy faces, but he just couldn't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. *'s pissy faces were aimed at RoveCo
for convincing him that Kerry would be a pushover.
Bush was saying, "Who *is* this guy? Where's Kerry?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpaceCatMeetsMars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. It reminded me of what I heard Tom Daschle said in his book
That the first time he met Bush was after the election and the guy was so insane, jerky and arrogant that he said "I hope you'll never lie to me." to Daschle. Probably, as far as Bush knows, what he is told to say is the truth and he probably thinks the Democrats and anybody else who disagrees with him is a big liar.

The press has not called him on his lies and deceptions and everybody who has challenged him has been smeared and ignored, so why should he think differently?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kerry is brilliant- he has improved his image and likeability remarkably
Kerry's demeanor has been perfect, he is reasonable and not arrogant and offers constructive criticism. He is respectful and dignified but not either waffling or haughty or aloof. Kerry is being revealed as the opposite of the negative images that the media and Buscho have tried to foist on the public to turn voters against Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. The emotional subtext was overwhelming
Edited on Sun Oct-03-04 07:31 AM by MrBenchley
Kerry came across as a calm, reasoning adult...and pResident Twitch came across as a spoiled kid trying to make excuses to the teacher about why he hadn't done his homework ("He forgot Poland!")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. wishlist:
You make an excellent point. The media with their indictments of Kerry's character and mannerisms so poisoned the atmosphere that they set the bar frighteningly low. This played against Bushco ironically and when Kerry didn't use words like antidisestablishmentarianism, he won on sheer relief points.

Who'da thunk that the press was so brilliant as to set * up like that? We always knew it was a liberal bunch out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. And Kerry was a closer !!
Edited on Sun Oct-03-04 08:42 AM by C_U_L8R
Kerry gave a very very strong close
to the debate and asked for your vote.

Bunnypants merely fumbled through surreal
visions of mountains and valleys below

No wonder Georgie was such a bad business person.
It's basic sales 101...... A. B. C. Always Be Closing.
First prize is leadership of the free world.
Second prize is a set of steak knives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Welcome to DU
True - Rovester violating every rule of sales. Bad close, poor demonstraton, obvious dissembling...the lists go on and on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peanut Gallery Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. "a slight smile during negativity works"
Agreed, Kerry was gracious and composed the entire time in spite of Bush's goading. It's like that old writing adage "show, not tell." Kerry showed presidential leadership while Bush could only describe it (in a defensive, childish way).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC