Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tim Russert "...new polls...shows John Kerry taking the lead."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:12 AM
Original message
Tim Russert "...new polls...shows John Kerry taking the lead."
"There are some new polls coming out now that shows John Kerry taking the lead"

That was Russert on the Sunday in New York show this morning.Coming up on Meet the Press.

polls = plural, more than one poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indef Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Polls except Gallup, maybe
I imagine they'd be the last to find out there was a Kerry bounce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The Gallup cutoff for likely voters should include more democrats
as a result of the first debate, so I expect that even the Gallup poll will show a marked improvement for Kerry, though probably not a lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. He ought to. He kicked Bush's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'd love to see the spread of Dems to Repubs
To see if it is as big as normal...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityHall Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Talking points
I hear Osama bin Laden is going as a weapon of mass destruction for
Halloween. That way Bush will never find him.

There's a saying that you should never attribute to malice what can
adequately be explained by incompetence. Bush and Cheney unite malice
and incompetence on the same ticket.

The pundits didn't call the bounce for Kerry becuase they were used to
seeing Bush's outtakes, and they didn't understand that the public has
only seen the stage-managed, scripted Bush. It's been four years
since Bush has had to withstand direct criticism, and back then he
benefited from expectations so low all he had to do was not drool on
himself to come out ahead.

You can bet if Kerry sends his secretary of state to the United
Nations Security Council, he won't have to go back and apologize six
months later because what he said turned out to be completely wrong.
That's what he means by passing the international test.

In the Bush tradition, I'm going to coin a new word: misleadership.
Bush mislead us when he promised us the most humble administration.
He mislead us when he said he was a uniter not a divider.

He's turned a country where people get their hands cut off into a
country where people get their heads cut off.

He's saying we need to send the troops better messages instead of
better equipment? Believe me George, if things are going badly on the
ground, the troops are the first to know, well before you see it on
your TV screen.

In the first term he repealed the estate tax. What's his agenda for
the second term, repealing anti-nepotism policies?

Bush is a lazy guy who traded on his family name, and when you
criticize his performance he complains that his job is hard. (I think
the charge of being lazy might stick, where 'stupid' and 'inept'
haven't really gotten under people's skin)

Bush was "slouching and praying for the light to go on so he wouldn't
have to think of anything else to repeat" - a Democratic strategist
quoted by Eleanor Clift

It's hard to imagine a worse strategy for Iraq than sticking with the
guy who not only created the mess, but can't even admit there have
been any mistakes.

Evidently debating's hard work. Bush needs other people to take over
for him since he didn't get it right the first time. Kind of like
Iraq.

Bush sounded like the kid who gets called on in class, who didn't read
the book. He tried to bluff his way through answers hoping no one
would notice.

To Bush, our soldiers are as expendable as our cruise missiles. (this
should make them go ballistic)

Just as he did at Harken, Bush dug himself a deep hole in the debate
with nothing at the bottom.

Bush thought it was a good idea to trust Northern Alliance militia to
catch bin Laden. You can bribe your way past those guys with a can of
tuna and an hour with your camel.

Before the debate, Republicans were voting for Bush and Democrats were
voting for anyone but Bush. Now after the debate, Democrats are
voting for John Kerry and Republicans are voting for their party's
platform.

Bush's macho posturing can be summed up as, "We don't need no stinkin'
allies."

Jenna could have done a better job in the debate.

Why is it Bush reacts to any criticism by looking like he just bit
into an ice-cream cone?

Bush's three-pronged plan for Iraq, inspired by SNL:
phase 1: Drive to Baghdad and secure the oil ministry
phase 2: Lull the enemy into a false sense of security by letting them
regoup and kill our soldiers
phase 3: We'll have a new enemy to replace the Soviet Union and
Republicans can get elected by being tough on Islamic terror
for the next fifty years

Bush's brain is incapable of imagining a counterfactual: you can't
give him a what-if scenario. Witness his handling of the debate
question about what would happen if Kerry were elected. His mind
isn't capable of considering a hypothetical question.

Bush fell in the polls after the debate because America doesn't suffer
fools gladly.

You can't point to the fact that you closed the barn door after the
horse got out and say, "Look, we made changes."

The pictures out of Iraq have given a new meaning to the term
"clusterfuck."

America needs a leader not a cheerleader.

Their new slogan: George W. Bush - Good enough for government work

You can't spell coward without 'W'

Don't misunderestimate the power of stupid people in large groups

Bush-Cheney '04: Almost every vote counts



"...my time off has clarified for me, even more, that this Bush team
can't get us there, and may have so messed things up that no one
can. Why? Because each time the Bush team had to choose between doing
the right thing in the war on terrorism or siding with its political
base and ideology, it chose its base and ideology." Thomas Friedman

The contrast could not be greater between Bush, a man who passionately
believes in the rightness of his convictions to the point of willfully
excluding facts, and Kerry, a man who operates by reason and
intellect. -- Eleanor Clift

George W. Bush went after Iraq with as much foresight as a schnauzer
going after a Chevy. -- Paul Mulshine, NJ Star-Ledger

"He cannot claim to be the commander in chief when things are going
well for him, and then sidestep responsibility when he is
embarrassed." -- "Gulf News" editorial, May 7 2004

"He (Bush) is not up to the job. This is not a moral judgment, but a
practical one. The world is too complex and dangerous for the pious
simplicities and arrogant unilateralism of George W. Bush"
-- Financial Times, ~May 12 2004

Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated,
drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever. -- Aristophanes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Helluva 2nd post, CityHall!
Welcome! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityHall Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thanks! (forgot one)
Thanks!

I forgot one:

If the terrorists really want Kerry to win, why did the Enemy send anthrax letters to congressional Democrats instead of Republicans?

(let them blather on about how there's more than one enemy - it's an old rhetorical trick, like whan Kerry deliberately 'forgot' Poland so Bush would sound weak in pointing it out)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Welcome to DU. You are goingto love it here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC