Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IA Strategy question: Help Sen. Kerry to hurt Gen. Clark?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:02 PM
Original message
IA Strategy question: Help Sen. Kerry to hurt Gen. Clark?
I've been kicking this around and I wonder; IA looks like it will be a pretty clear-cut Dean victory, if not a blowout altogether, so with an eyes on NH and Wesley Clark, what do you think about this:

Using preset measures of support, etc., the Dean campaign decides to help Sen. Kerry to achieve a 'respectable second place' finish. With that bounce, Sen. Kerry heads to NH and reverses his 'slide' in the polls and holds Gen. Clark to less than the 15% required for delegates.

The campaign moves to SC, etc., and Dean, boosted by two consecutive wins and Kerry, with two solid 2nd place finishes are suddenly #1 and #2, because SC voters give Sen. Edwards a second look and he and gen. Clark divide the 'southern vote', giving either Dean or Kerry 1st with the other 2nd.

Your thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's the plan
But it takes a pretty cocky view of IA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We have every reason to be confident, at this point.
Cocky? Yeah, a little---but not a lot. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You would not be cocky if you understood Iowa
Remember, people can change their minds. If voters notice these shenanigans, they may change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MIMStigator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
52. yup especially since Dean has already been accused of fraud
if he's already thought of as a fraud this will backfire because it looks like more fraud and manipulation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. No one more bullish on Dean
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 03:09 PM by HFishbine
I have Dean two points over your 50% prediction in the Official IA Prediction thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=94936

(Of course, if "the plan" gets implemented, my predicions go down the toilet.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I noticed.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. There is a difference between Dean supporters and Dean voters
Dean supporters might be willing. Dean voters will probably not. Clark needs to hope the caucaus is close so no one can pull any games. Also, Dean has to worry about the anti-dean there. If Edwards is limited or someone else, those votes probably won't go to Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I dunno.
Harkin's endosement means a lot, and I think Dean voters are also Dean supporters, and would want to do what's best for our campaign overall. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. I know
but people don't want to be manipulated. If they go there to vote for Dean, they want to vote for Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
62. More dirty tricks from the Dean contingency. How do youall sleep at night?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MIMStigator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
53. Maybe there isn't if the reports about out of state supporters voting
are true

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windansea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. you lost me after first sentence
it won't be a blowout

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. We'll see.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Let them strategize
we're starting to scare some campaigns. It may force someone into a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Laughable.
We're certainly not scared of the Clark campaign, I assure you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkGraham2004 Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. ooooookaaay!!!!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. n/t
:eyes: back at ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkGraham2004 Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. More smileys!!!
Make some more posts claiming Dean will blow everyone out and Clark sucks!! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Never made a post sating Clark sucks.
Can you document that I have?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkGraham2004 Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Please stop talking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. no, thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. What You Need To Be Scared Of Is The Crappy Campaign Dean Has
Had 2 years but just gets around to hiring Foriegn Policy Advisors and Discussing some kind of "Taxcut" for the Middle Class... when these two things are Dean's Weakest Links?

Then we've got Dean telling reporters his Staff won't let him talk anymore.

He allows the Rebel Flag comment to consume one news cycle when all he had to do is apologise.

Gets busted on the phone saying they're going negative on Clark.

Allows Sealed Records to consume several News Cycles and uses infantile remarks like "I'll show mine when he shows his." Lies about why the Records are sealed... admits he lied... then goes back to original lie in a debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. The crappy campaign that's kicking everyone else's butts?
Yeah, we'll get right on changing that...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
45. If its laughable
why the recent behavior of the campaign and why the need to strategize?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #45
55. The need to strategize is ever-present.
And what 'recent behavior' are you referring to? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
64. Why do you want to help the Kerry campaign in order to stop Clark then?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. It never hurt anyone to be careful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. guess ya read the article in the Globe yesterday :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #34
44. Thanks for the link.
Actually, I hadn't. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #44
60. no problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. still makes little sense to me
but at least here it is explicit as a stop Clark strategy.

I posted this news account of such a strategy yesterday and it pretty much sunk. (Forgot to attack Clark or Dean, I guess):

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=88877
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is a divisive and unnecessary tactic - I condemn this idea!
Let the voters decide unencumbered by petty partisanship from overly enthusiastic (fill-in name) supporters!

Clark did not vote for IWR! If Clark comes in second, or even first, it is far preferable than having a pro-IWR candidate win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. It's not divisive.
It's politics. The object of the entire exercise, politically-speaking, is for your candidate to win. if this helps him, so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. The "win at all cost" way of doing business is part of the problem
This is the sort of thing that gave us the Dean/Osama ad, and the vicious "soft on terrorism" attacks on Dean from another candidate that shall remain nameless.

Winning is important, but equally important is how you win. How would you feel if the party bosses decide to fix the convention and a pro-IWR candidate becomes the "compromise" nominee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. The difference:
This is a grass-roots strategy; the other is, by definition, not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. I saw an example of such "grass-root" strategy today
I saw an example of such "grass-root" strategy today on an e-mail posted on several listservs for Dean supporters by a "joe_trippi" about paid intern positions in the Dean campaign. This enterprising "joe_trippi" added these words:

"Dean for America is currently seeking 5,000 motivated, resourceful, energetic and hardworking individuals of all ages, sizes, and backgrounds for our Paid Internship Madness Program. Due to close sleeping quarters homosexuals will not be accepted for this position."

The possibility that this "joe_trippi" could be a supporter of another Democratic candidate cannot be dismissed.

I don't think we need to sink to this level, don't you agree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
48. Indiana .... the email you referenced was the topic of a blog headline ...
It's bogus and the campaign asked everyone to get the word out that this is an oppo tactic by unknown persons. Please, everybody, whichever candidate you support, watch out for emails that "seem" to be from a campaign but smell peculiar like this one does. Watch the return address. Obviously, Joe Trippi's not going to send email to supporters from a Yahoo account! Watch the campaign information at the bottom of the email. This one says "deanforamericans" not Dean for America (the official name of the campaign.

Since all these things can be gimmicked, though, if you have any concerns at all, please forward the email to the campaign in question, post it on their blog and ask if it's theirs. It's the only way to get the word out.

DO NOT FORWARD EMAIL THAT DOESN'T PASS THE SMELL TEST.

Remember, whoever this particular email is from, Rove WILL be using these techniques against our eventual candidate, and we have to train ourselves and our circle of friends/coworkers/relatives to be on the alert for this kind of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Clark sees nothing wrong with School of the Americas
I think its a great idea ! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. it's a horrible idea! Praising a school that has a record of its
graduates killing people in their countries is terrible! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
40. Clark was praising WHISC, not SOA
WHISC was created as the result of legitimate criticism of SOA's curricula, and the human rights record of some of its graduates.

I suggest that you aim your fire at Bill Clinton for not abolishing SOA outright, and for pursuing Plan Colombia, which has brought more misery and deaths to the people in that unhappy region of the world than the individual acts of violence of some SOA graduates.

Personally, I think we should abolish WHISC and get out of the business of supporting oligarchies in Latin America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowDawgDemocrat Donating Member (181 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
28. That is precisely the strategy being implemented
Kudos to you for noticing.

As far as this nonsense about Dean's support being in trouble, not hardly. It's still going to be about left leaning voters going Dean and right leaning voters going Clark. Kerry only figures into the fray in New Hampshire.

Clark will be expected to do well in New Hampshire, but he can survive a 3rd to Kerry, although that will deflate his momentum going into South Carolina. Dean isn't expected to do well in the South and will have plenty of wiggle room either way. If Clark fails to land a 2nd in South Carolina he's finished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
29. i don't think it will work
there are too many ways for that scenario to backfire. Dean is in the lead, but does not control enough of the variables to carry out such a scheme. besides that, it's manipulative and some would say fraudulent. it actually sounds like a repub scheme. better to play it straight, and let the chips fall where they may.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. I agree (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
31. Too Bad Dean Can't Win On His Own Merits
It must suck to have a candidate that can't even put forth a platform that a majority of Americans want or who presents a persona that they can appreciate and connect with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Thank you for contributing.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Quite unlike
The unimaginable wit and insight of your deep thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
36. it might or it might not work if the candidates are so closely
bunched together. Then they wouldn't help throw their votes to any other candidate. However, if Dean has a large margin of winning, and he confirms this through phone calls from his precinct captains, he might as well help Dean voters throw their votes to Kerry, but I don't think this would really be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. I'm not sure it's practical, frankly.
But it is interesting to kick around. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
41. Kerry can't possibly get 2nd on his own
:eyes:

I'm so sick of this. Isn't there any other way for Dean to win besides beating up on Kerry?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. We're only trying to help...
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. You're the ones who need help
Your polling numbers really are not looking good. Dean is going down everywhere and it's only going to get worse as more and more people start taking a hard look at his flip-flopping, pandering and gaffes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. Dream on.
"President Dean" has a lovely sound to it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. Aw, you won't get to hear it though
So sad. :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. Hehe.
We shall see....we shall see...:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
42. This is silly.
Iowa is Iowa, New Hampshire is New Hampshire, South Carolina is South Carolina....................................->

You can't win with this type of second guessing. Voters look at the candidates, and Clark is looking REAL GOOD in NH and SC.

Clark's gonna take this nomination!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iowapeacechief Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
46. How to "throw" the Iowa caucuses?
I'll be a caucus chair, and I sure can't see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. Wel if they can't sneak in 3500 voters then I guess this is the best
thing for them....huh....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. No proof of that.
there is NO proof of that libelous piece of garbage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
47. Smart Concept.
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 04:09 PM by David Zephyr
This goes to the heart of the problem with caucus contests. They, along with the electoral college are all vulnerable to gaming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
50. Everyone is missing the point here...
no strategy is going to help Dean. His recent slip in the polls means that Americans are just now starting to wake up and get a real good look at him, and what they see is not something they like. Sure because of early momentum he may squeak by in Iowa, and N.H. for that matter but by the time he reaches South Carolina, 24 days from now it is probably going to be a Clark - Edwards race in that state. My guess is that with Sharpton polling well among African Americans in S.C., Clark is going to run away with it...and from then on Dean has to hope for wins in some of the other big primary states like Michigan just to stay alive.

I think with the current momentum...Clark is going to pull a big surprise in N.H. Dean is going to lose his front runner status nationally before then.

Americans are having their coffee now and reading the Newspaper and the Dean headlines are not that motivational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. Americans support the war in Iraq too!
and all of this is based on the limited and distorted information they get from the media. I have little faith in the future of a nation that chooses to remain ignorant of the world in which it is a part of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
54. Bad strategy. Here's why
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 04:09 PM by Bucky
If you boost Kerry to keep him up in Iowa, you may not keep Clark down in New Hampshire. Kerry's had 20 years to sell himself in that region, so he's sliding there on his own merits. But a 2nd place finish for Kerry in Iowa is a kayo for Gephardt nationwide. Yet Gephardt is far and away a stronger competitor against Clark for the role of Anti-Dean.

Kerry is not gonna translate out of his region any more. If Clark is hammered in NH, it's still just a regional loss and he can bounce back in the South and West. He'll bounce back a whole lot stronger if you knock Gephardt out of the race for him. Dean's 2nd best choice of tactics would be to knock out Kerry now and let the antiDean vote get split among Lieberman, Clark, and Gephardt across the Feb 3rd races. Dean's very best choice of tactics would be to say "screw tactics" and just go for the most number of votes he can get.

ABB. (But we're gonna beat Dean, yet. Just watch. (But if I'm wrong it's back to ABB classic).)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
59. Interesting theory
This is going to be so much fun. Reading DU for the last three years has been an education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
63. Might hurt Dean more
than it hurts Clark. But hey, it's up to you. Or him. Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
67. Wishful thinking
I can only hope alot of Dean supporters are as overconfident as you are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
68. I would recommend against doing this.
We should always do our best at all times and places. I prefer to take the initiative and leave gaming to others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC