BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-03-04 07:29 PM
Original message |
On the 23rd of October 2004, American Troops |
|
will have been in Iraq longer than American Troops were involved in World War I (according to George Will). Just another factoid to batter my ignoneigbors with which include:
FUCK NO, SEPTEMBER 11TH DIDN'T CHANGE EVERYTHING
FUCK NO, MY FAMILY IS NOT SAFER WITH LITTLE SADDAM IN JAIL
AND MY LIST GOES ON
FORWARD MARCH, TEAMMATES.
|
Catch22Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-03-04 07:36 PM
Response to Original message |
1. This notion that we're safer with saddam in jail |
|
Is just pure nonsense. We're no safer with him in jail than we are with Milosevich in jail, but at least we all knew why we went to Bosnia. We didn't need our president to lie to us about it, and we didn't lose any American lives to capture him. So put that in your freeper "mind altering" pipe and smoke it.
|
HysteryDiagnosis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-03-04 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. This notion that we're safer with saddam in jail<< |
|
It's hard to feel safe with a war criminal in the WH.
www.brusselstribunal.org CONSIDERING that in 1997 a Washington (D.C.) think-tank was founded, the “Project for the New American Century” (PNAC), aimed at promoting “American leadership worldwide”,
MINDFUL that in 2000 and 2001, reports have been adopted in the framework of PNAC, which proclaim that American hegemony should be realised by a tremendous growth in the defense budget; "by fighting and decisvely winning, multiple simultaneous major theater wars"; by deterring all potential competing powers and by permanent military presence all over the planet, particularly in the Gulf;
TAKING NOTE that crucial elements of the doctrine put forward in the framework of PNAC have been officially endorsed by the US administration, especially in the “National Strategy Security” approved by President George W. Bush in September 2002;
PREOCCUPIED by the fact that the National Security Strategy has provided the conceptual framework within which the “preventive war” fought against Iraq in 2003 has been decided and carried out, whereas there was no legal basis for this war in the United Nations Charter or Security Council Resolution 1441;
WORRIED by the disastrous impact of the war against Iraq on the Middle-East Region and in the Arab world, by the instability it has brought to international relations and all the disastrous implications for the entire planet;
ALARMED by the threats that the PNAC and National Security Strategy may hold for the future, and by the fact that other “preventive wars” may be decided and carried out in the near future against so-called “rogue States” or other States perceived to be a threat to US national security; and
WILLING to assess the risks and threats that the abovementioned US policies may hold for the world in the years to come in an extensive and informed manner,
The BRussells Tribunal Committee have resolved as follows : <more>
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:21 PM
Response to Original message |