Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So many Americans don't even know the definitions of "global"???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 06:21 AM
Original message
So many Americans don't even know the definitions of "global"???
How come so many Americans automatically think the word "global" means "worldwide"? No bloody wonder the world thinks America is out to rule the world!

1. BUY A DICTIONARY!

The FIRST definition of global is SPHERICAL. As in ROUND.

Was bush mocking Kerry for saying there should be a ROUND TEST and that bush thinks it should be a SQUARE TEST???

2. The 2nd definition of 'global' is worldwide. But OBVIOUSLY, unless you don't speak or understand any English, Kerry was NOT referring to a 'worldwide test'.

3. The 3rd definition of 'global' is APPLYING TO THE WHOLE, as in "ALL AMERICANS".

4. Learn some grammar and what TENSES mean.

5. Before mocking what you don't understand, LOOK IT UP. While the literacy level in America is one of the lowest of all modern nations, not ALL Americans are illiterate.

That doesn't make them "elitist". It just makes them able to converse intelligently and on a par with most the rest of the world.

Instead of wanting everyone else to dumb down, try to SMARTEN UP.

Kerry said:

"that passes the global test where your countrymen, your people understand fully why you're doing what you're doing and you can prove to the world that you did it for legitimate reasons."

Not difficult to understand at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maiden England Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. that is a great succinct way to put it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. I disagree and don't think it's a point worth pursuing for Dems
How would one parse "prove to the world"? And what does "legitimate" mean in this context? Isn't Kerry talking about international law? I think it shows a significant difference between the two candidates. Kerry's position is superior and more in keeping with popular views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. ......well, what can 'ya say?
(Comprehensive) (total) “a . . . global, generalized sense of loss”...

....or relating to an entire program, document, or file.

I feel your point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC