Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has anyone else been watching FauxNews lately?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 09:59 AM
Original message
Has anyone else been watching FauxNews lately?
I saw it this morning, and Fox and Friends seemed downright centrist. What's going on?

Has anyone else noticed this?


MSNBC is seeming leftist all of a sudden (as of friday night anyway).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Haven't seen it but
it would be ludicrous for them to pump up Bush like they have been doing when everyone else knows that he looked like a fool during the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. I listen to hate radio in the morning on the way to work
(only talk radio in my area) and Laura Flanders was slamming Joe Scarborough and so were her callers.

The ugly RW hate mongers are eating their own now! Don't you just hate it ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Perhaps they now realize just how badly the new administration
as well as over half of the country could, would, should kick their asses for what they have been trying to pass off as "fair and balanced" for the last 4 years.

Nice to see them squirm... it will be particularly interesting to watch rabid Fox News afficianados faces as they see their sole source of news morph into something totally different, reversing their opinions, running scared.... heh, heh, heh.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. God Bless Joey Scarborough....
Edited on Mon Oct-04-04 10:11 AM by MsTryska
for all his ultra-conservativeness - at least he stands up for his beliefs, and recognizes that it's his beliefs he's loyal to and not the party.

I was first impressed with him, when he wound up on al franken's show, tearing dubya a new one on fiscal policy.


I'm glad some are standing up on their side, and letting the world know that they don't like dubya either even tho he alleges he's a republican.


I've actually gained some respect for those republicans who have stayed true to the ideals their party is supposed to stand for, even if i disagree with those ideals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
63. I noticed immediately after the debate, Joe Scarborough...
Edited on Mon Oct-04-04 02:55 PM by scottknapper
...was THE very first Republican, at least that I'm aware of, who admitted Bush got handled, and gave an honest assessment of his performance. I was quite surprised. Having said that, I'll file him in the same place I'm currently keeping Libya- I'm glad they're coming around, but I'm just not 100% convinced yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #63
68. *lol* that's a good analogy.....
I won't say he's on our side, but he's somewhere a little more trustworth than Libya/Pat Robertson.


I wish i could find a clip for the Joe Scarborough bit from the Al Franken Show, but i'm sorry to say AirAmerica's website sucks.

He really sounded sane on fiscal policy, and apparently he had ripped bush just that day in a Wall Street Journal Op/Ed piece.

He ain't one of us, but my enemy's enemy is my friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LowerManhattanite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. I believe you meant to say Laura Ingraham,
right? Not AAR's Laura Flanders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. You are right, thanks for the correction!
I am happily listening to AAR now, mind melt I guess!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Just Wait To Listen If They Lose
It's gonna be bloody...and the finger pointing will be incredible. If Bunnypants loses big...including the House & Senate then the shit will really fly and it will start on hate radio.

Remember, these are catty, arrogant, small people who need hate and frustration to make their voices and irrational logic rational, and nothing breeds this more than a new target to hate.

Also, in the background, is the ratings and ego game of those hate radio hosts. Many are waiting for Rushbo to drop and trying to position themselves for his audience and "mantle". No doubt Hannity will attempt to grab that title with O'Reilly, Bettamillion Bennett, Savage, Ingraham and others going at each other...blaming one another for losing the election. It should provide lots of hours of fun listening.

Scanning around the country as I do, I'm not hearing the bluster or the confidence in these goons (except for the ones out of Texas...LOL) like we did even two weeks ago. Here's hoping they crash & burn with their decrepit agenda and manchild!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lasttrip Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. good point. they are all about themselves. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
32. I'd pay to see Hannity when he finally implodes!
Maybe it will be soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #32
38. Yes, it would be worth any amount
to see that happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hot Water Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #38
71. There'll be hair grease all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
75. they will not blame each other, they will blame us...for cheating...
don't forget they organized an impeach Clinton club within weeks of the November 1992 election, before Clinton had even been sworn into office.

My guess is they have alread organized an impeach Kerry club and have probably raised millions of dollars to smear him throughout his 8 years in office.

Wonder how we can stop that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
50. Flanders or Ingraham?
Laura Flanders ("Bushwomen") is on our side. Laura Ingraham ("Shut Up and Sing") is part of the scary right wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
78. I think you mean Laura Ingraham (~shudder~)...
Laura Flanders is one of the good guys, on AAR.

23.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. Yes, it was ingraham - my apologies to all for the confusion
it is funny to listen to the hate moungers attack each other. Until Nov, these guys ought to be pretty funny, turning on it other and freeping over *'s follies and faults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniorPlankton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. I heard that the Freepers are complaining
that Fox is turning into CNN lite.
How amusing, I think CNN is Fox Lite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyalWickedness Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ha ha, me too.
Especially "Arkuda" (Greek for Wolf)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. So they are noticing too....
i was wondering if it was wishful thinking on my part, but nope, it's a definite and real shift. cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike L Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
37. Funny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush was AWOL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yep. I've been watching MSNBC and Faux all morning
and both have been good. MSNBC has reported the new polls at the beginning of every hour so far today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SangamonTaylor Donating Member (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. the rats are jumping ship
Fox is not in this for politics, it's in it for money. They have to support a winner...rats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. This is true.....and
really i don't mind as long as the butter is on my side of the bread.

what is Rupert Murdoch's deal anyway? I know he's australian, but does he really have any interest in the Right, or was it just a niche that needed filling, for him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RafterMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
28. And Murdoch Press Organ NY Post
ran a debunking bit on the stealth pen controversy.

Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Hmm.....maybe the WH tried to give him static
on the newsfeed for the debates and him not playing nice with them, and he's ready to show them just how powerful the media can be?

or perhaps they displeased him in some way prior to the debates and he's engineering a Kerry landslide?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
30. The only thing Murdoch loves more than conservative politics...
...is money. He won't back Boy George & his posse of freaks if he thinks he'll lose financially.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. I've been seeing a change but they are only doing it for long enough to
get folks watching again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolinian Donating Member (861 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
34. You said it. It's all temorary so don't get taken in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LowerManhattanite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. They seem oddly...sad—and a little stunned.
I have a feeling there is some ver-rrry dismal internal polling the public has not seen (and will NOT ever see) that indicates serious slippage for King Curious the 43rd.

Methinks the undecideds and "soft" republicans are trending the wrong way and there isn't enough time to pull 'em back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. Heard O Liely on the radio and

I didn't even know who was talking.
I thought it was a left thinking talk show host.
I was shocked when it was O Liely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. no way? what the heck was he saying? (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. He was really defending Kerry


One of the callers said that Kerry made some mistake at the debate.
O'Liely told him that people are always saying that he said something that he didn't say. He just blew off the caller.

He was calm and did not Kerry bash AT ALL.

I was shocked when about the forth call, the man said, " I am honored to get to talk to you Mr. O' Reilly.!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. Hmm...seems Hell has frozen over. nt.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
18. Never watch it, BUT today it was on at the gym
and I never got pissed off for the 30 mn I was on the bike. They even picked on Bush a bit. Something felt really wrong... Oh, the weather man was really, really unfunny and the DJ guy (soemthing ..Man) they interview is an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. I was watching to see what the weekend debate spin
would be. I was totally expecting them to talk about draws and bush wins and kerry losses and so forth and none of that. and I caught them picking on bush too. it was crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacemeal Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
20. Carl Cameron was NOT covering Kerry this morning
I wonder if this is permanent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
21. I've noticed that as well, but I think with Fox it's temporary.
I watch MSNBC in the morning while I get ready for work, and I've been pleasantly surprised. One of their reporters (a woman named Chris, I think) actually follows up with hard-hitting questions. She was rough on Karen Hughes after the debate.

Uh oh, she's not on this morning. That is not a good sign. :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. I saw her go at karen. I think my jaw might have dropped (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
axis Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
61. Yeah, Chris has consistantly
been balanced. (The girl Chris. Matthews
is untrustworthy)/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
22. A whore has no allegiances except to money
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lasttrip Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
27. they can't ignore reality any longer.
the majority can see their transparency and they need the ratings.
kudos to all DU'ers that helped wake some of them up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
31. Deleted FAUX from the Television, CNN is next
I do not watch them any more, they make me physically ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philostopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
33. Most importantly ...
Edited on Mon Oct-04-04 10:52 AM by nownow
I think they want to keep interest up across the spectrum to get their ratings numbers up for the second debate. See, here is where they probably will run foul of the administration -- personally, I think the best the Bush* campaign can hope for is suppressed interest in the second debate. They really can't get out of it, and they can't make major sea changes in the Naked Emperor (who's really freakin' naked now, eh!), but even their shill networks have to get that ad dollar, and they see that being viewed as merely a mouthpiece for the administration means the entire left half of the political spectrum will watch CSPAN or CBS instead of Fox because they suspect Fox's beholden to the administration.

Coming off as being more centrist may draw more ratings points, and that's how Fox determines how to charge for ad time. Same goes for MSNBC. They go with the polling, because they want those numbers -- good ratings mean more revenue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. Well then what we've bene doing is working huh?
if the only way to thold them accoutnable is through ad dollars, then let's keep hurting them where it counts. Incidentally i will be watching cspan for all my debate coverage, but i like to check the spin, so i know what talkign points to expect from my freepers.


in any case - I've pretty much given up on CBS Easly Show for real campaign news...they keep bringing that RW shill Craig Crawford on to explain Decision 2004.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philostopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #35
44. I ain't helping Fox any over here.
The only thing Fox that ever gets turned on in this house is FSN (sports), and both the Mr. and I get most of our news off the Internet. We turn CSPAN on for speeches and the debates. If we were a Nielsen family, Nielsen would be very disappointed -- we watch The Daily Show, VH-1 Classic and the Cartoon Network the overwhelming majority of the time around here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #35
66. Close your eyes, and Craig Crawford's voice is Pat Robertson's.
Edited on Mon Oct-04-04 03:00 PM by janeaustin
(edited for typo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. same voice from James Dobson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUSTANG_2004 Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
36. Didn't watch Fox, but Tucker Carlson
has a show on PBS, and he seemed un-optimistic about Iraq. I'd thought he was a gung-ho partisan, but he didn't seem like one regarding Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Chronicler Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #36
48. He's always been pretty anti-Iraq.
Along the same lines as Novak and Buchanan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUSTANG_2004 Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #48
58. Well, that would explain it
I shy away from tv news in general (the internet is faster and more informative), but I'd thought he was a neocon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyr330 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
39. NO!
I never, ever watch Faux News; in fact, I dropped it long, long before I dumped CNN. However, from what you say, I may have to take a peek to see what's going on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike L Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
40. FOX trying to lower expectations for the 2nd debate?
Their viewers must be miserable. Good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debatepro Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
41. Could it be the campaign
Could it be that so many progressives have been hammering them and they see the power of the movement. I think in addition to writing the news orginazations with our greviences we should send them to there advertizers as well. Then we might just see fair and balanced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
42. I removed it from my channel line up!
I don't even want to be able to see the initials for that sorry network. If you have DirecTV which unfortunately is now part of Murdoch inc. you can remove the station from your lineup. It's easy and fun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
43. Fox Hasn't Changed
What is wrong w/ you people? They're as Shilling as ever. Can someone point to an example of how they've become more centrist?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #43
46. Have you been watching their news the last couple of days?
because what i saw this morning on Fox n Friends was definitely far more centrist, than say..the early show.

For instance, they reported Kerry and Bush Tied in the polls, AND the mentioned the Rasmussen polls and the poll where Kerry was leading, with NO Qualifiers.


that's a major shift, considering it's fox we're talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Polls are Polls tho...
It's a hard number, so it's tougher to spin.

I'm sure they underscored whatever particular question Bush still leads Kerry in...

JD

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. No! They Didn't! It was bizaare, and left me feeling
ambivalent. Like maybe I jsut wanted that to be reality or soemthing.


i've been living in this world of cognitive dissonance so long, i think i have Stockholm Syndrome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #43
57. I have to agree with these guys to a point...
Faux is still crappy BUT truth be told IMO it hasn't been as bad as CNN has been lately.

At least with FOX you expect make believe stupidity but CNN has the nerve to pretend they are an actual *news" station.

I personally think that for about the last six months CNN has been even more right leaning than FOX (and I didn't think that was possible)

The Today show has also become a TOTAL joke...Katie Couric needs to go period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. I agree.....i've been seeing the same thing lately....
the alleged "news" stations that give the appearance of centrism seem to be much further right than fox lately.


I listen to AirAmerica whenever i'm driving, and CNNRadio provides them with "news". I think i get hives everytime they do one of their spots. So biased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #57
69. CNN Sucks
I don't watch that much Fox but I used to watch CNN all the time. But the coverage of this election is so biased it's unbelievable. I love how they always seem to have technical problems that ends up hurting democrats. They are a sad and pathetic new station and progressives need to let them know that their biased news and tactics to sabotage democrats are not acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Borgnine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
45. Something is happening.
Faux News HAS softened a bit. MSNBC is whoring a little less. The only one who's still marching towards the right is CNN, but I suspect that might change if the debates go badly for Cheney and Bush this week.

Perhaps the neo-conservative moment is fully aware what a loser Bush is and is preparing to cut its losses and start over again in 2008. Maybe they think that if Bush stays in office for another four years, people's opinions of Republicans in general will sour to the point where they'll be out of office for years.

I don't know. It's just a weird shift I've sensed over the weekend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #45
77. It's all about ratings. They want a horserace.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ matters most dontcha know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Chronicler Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
47. It's hard to spin for Bush right now.
Maybe they're trying to kiss some Kerry ass before he wins the election? So as not to be totally blacklisted by him for the next 4 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
52. Maybe they're afraid Kerry will reinstate the Fairness Doctrine
so they're thinking they better start being nice to him. With one swipe of a pen their careers could be over. Hell, they'd have to go work at WALMART!!! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
53. The Closer the Race, the More Money TV Stations Make
TV stations in the swing states are making a bloody fortune from political advertising this year. They also are seeing higher ratings, which translates to higher advertising rates for other types of advertising. The closer the race, the more money the TV stations and networks make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
54. FOX
Don't trust Fox....wonder what they are up too. The switch is too fast. What is Rove up to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
55. I haven't watched Faux News since 2000.
As soon as the chimp was selected, I banned Faux from my TV.

They probably see the writing on the wall. They have probably gotten the dirt on the chimp's love child and that story is to break this week. The chimp is going down and they know it. I STILL think Kerry should ban Faux News from his WH press corp. They should NEVER be given access to him. EVER. Any journalist who shilled for this WH should be banned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elduderino Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
56. my guess is oil is not under $20 per barrell as the neocon cabal promised
Rupert Murdoch..., he's just interested in Money - he'll jump ship without a moments notice - just like he's poited out to Blair


Monday February 17, 2003
MURDOCH THE OIL IMPERIALIST: Murdoch has acknowledged his major rationale for supporting the Iraq invasion: oil. While both American and British politicians strenuously deny the significance of oil in the war, the Guardian of London notes, "Murdoch wasn't so reticent. He believes that deposing the Iraqi leader would lead to cheaper oil." Murdoch said before the war, "The greatest thing to come out of this for the world economy...would be $20 a barrel for oil. That's bigger than any tax cut in any country." He buttressed this statement when he later said, "Once is behind us, the whole world will benefit from cheaper oil which will be a bigger stimulus than anything else."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,897015,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michigandem2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
59. I caught a bit of faux today
that dark haired ass still smooches * ass but they seemed less hostile to left sided views or guests...its weird...but I don't trust any of them ....Kerry is slightly ahead and they saw the disgrace of * on Thursday...so my guess is they are realizing Kerry might actually pull this out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
axis Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
60. I fainted when O'Reilly interviewed Bush
He asked the most hard hidding questions I've seen anyone
in the media have the guts to ask.
Something has happened at Fox for sure.
I would love to know what is going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. You mean he didn't feed him the answers in the form of a
question?


are you being sarcastic, or serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoceansnerves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #60
67. yeah.
nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #60
79. and by hard-hitting, I presume you mean flaccid-with-no-followups, yes?
Either that or you're the King of Sarcasm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrowNotAngelGRL Donating Member (447 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
65. All I can think of
is they want to be on the winning side and Kerry seems to be doing well now. Or maybe they're not afraid anymore and using their freedoms again? *shrug* Oh and I do like Joe Scarbrough though. He's an okay guy. I watch his show every once in a while. Jon Stewart is still #1 though. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #65
72. Word. Jon Stewart
rocks my world.

but what the hell do i know? i'm just a stoned slacker. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hot Water Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #65
73. Keith Obermann has been our tried and true friend.
Fox kiss my:kick: I'll turn him around for ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #65
74. I think they play cat and mouse

Remember during the Republican convention after the protesters went crazy on CNN?

All of a sudden, Chris Matthews was acting a little nicer.
Some said, let's watch MSNBC.

Then, Rove must have made the call to them about small planes.
They started bamming Kerry again.

Cat and mouse to keep the ratings. Then they play hardball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
76. Fuck Fox News!
They mean nothing to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
80. My guess - fairness doctrine
http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/F/htmlF/fairnessdoct/fairnessdoct.htm

They know that Bush is weak. From their point of view, if Kerry wins (when he wins), he may have coattails that swing the Senate too. The fairness doctrine was elliminated by Reagan, and allowed Limbaugh, Hannity, etc to pollute the airwaves. Although it wouldn't apply to FNC (on cable), Fox proper owns stations, probably has interests in radio stations, etc.

If Bush wins, no problems. If Kerry wins, they're probably screwed.

The smart thing to do would be to deliver the election to Kerry, and he would be so grateful that he wouldn't reinstate the fairness doctrine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
82. POLL: Do you think Fox News is biased, or fair and balanced?
Do you think Fox News is biased, or fair and balanced?
http://www.nynewsday.com/other/special/amny/

From AM New York.... also great article busting Fox on fabricating news items/

(PS I can't create new topics yet... but if any senior DU's
want to bump this up... be my guest)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC