Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Luntz lies about GOP work

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Jon8503 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 09:38 PM
Original message
Luntz lies about GOP work
MediaMatters has the goods:

Reporting Republican pollster Frank Luntz's complaints about MSNBC's decision to drop him from its debate coverage after a letter from Media Matters for America, as well as criticism from progressive weblogs and their readers, Washington Post staff writer Howard Kurtz reported that Luntz "says he's done no GOP work since 2001" but didn't bother to look into whether Luntz's statement was true.
From Kurtz's October 4 "Media Notes" column in The Washington Post:

"I think they buckled to political pressure," says Luntz, who has advised Republicans from Newt Gingrich to Rudy Giuliani but says he's done no GOP work since 2001. "They caved. ... Why is it that Democrats are allowed to do this" after leaving politics, "but Republicans aren't?"
But as MMFA has noted, the St. Paul (Minn.) Pioneer Press reported on September 2: "Earlier this year, GOP pollster Frank Luntz advised Republicans to never talk about Iraq or homeland security without first mentioning how '9/11 changed everything.'" The Cleveland Plain Dealer reported on September 1: "Republican pollster Frank Luntz did his best Tuesday to pump up Ohio's Republicans at a delegation breakfast. 'If you guys fail, if John Kerry becomes president by a percent or half a percent, I think you're going to be pretty regretful,' he said."


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/10/4/21545/7872

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Doosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. his post debate results were actually favorable to us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRLMGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. he was probably
just trying to appear objective by reporting reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Howard Kutz is hardly a reliable source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. He looks mad here
Edited on Tue Oct-05-04 08:40 AM by pse517
"

That's ok, Frank, you're still standin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC