|
Edited on Tue Oct-05-04 09:49 AM by soupkitchen
FOUR MORE YEARS, FOUR MORE YEARS
It is the opinion of this debate watcher that President Bush did not lose the first debate; he just won it too quickly. The President’s strategy was sound. If he could attack Senator Kerry’s character vociferously enough during the first ten minutes Senator Kerry would undoubtedly break into tears and be forced to leave the stage. But because he had too efficiently invaded Senator Kerry’s territory, thereby inadvertently pinning him to podium, the unintended consequence was that the Senator still had eighty minutes to launch an insurgency by hurling a few truth grenades at the President. Like the fact that Iraq did not actually attack the United States. Fair enough. But, let’s not blame the President for not relying on facts to win his arguments. Listen, the President knows facts. He knows facts are hard work. In fact he’s watched “Jeopardy” and “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire” on TV often enough to know accumulating facts can be very hard work. It’s just that his worldview is not predicated on facts. This President is about gut instincts, and his gut instincts are to personally attack people, countries, legal democratic principles, whenever he feels his entitlements are threatened. So, the only real mistake the President made in the debate the other night was the strategic one of agreeing to have it last more than ten minutes. To any neutral observer who was watching last Thursday it was obvious after ten minutes that President Bush, with a blitzkrieg of acidic grimaces and sneering innuendo, had clearly established John Kerry did not have the character, or moral consistency, to be President. And it was only the other unfortunate eighty minutes of informed and pointed commentary by the Senator that undermined the President’s case. But again, this does not mean the President lost. It only means he won too quickly; that perhaps, he assumed mission accomplished a bit too quickly. And that is what the American public should take away from the debates. That it was only because the President won the opening few minutes of the debate so overwhelmingly that he seemed to be an occupying army of one, posted reluctantly to the foreign policy stage, for the next eighty. That this debate was not a loss for the President, but only another one of his catastrophic successes. That, in the end, it is only the ever-decreasing minority of open-minded Americans who will fail to respond to the determinedly closed mind of the President. Or, as any of the President’s neocon supporters might say, “Hold the Bagel. Just give me the smear.”
FOUR MORE YEARS, FOUR MORE YEARS
|